waybread
Well-known member
Blackbery, suit yourself. But for what reason do you find the research paper from Harvard University invalid? I mean, what was your problem with the data and methods? I found it to be thoughtful and meticulous.
Isn't it common sense that property damage is assessed by insurance appraisers and adjusters, not by untrained journalists-- let alone by social media mavens?
Do you think Harvard University research studies are fake news? What about fact-checking sites?
Your carping against BLM seems vaguely racist to me. I am not calling you a racist, but saying that you seem unconcerned and even unaware of the root problems BLM supporters try to address.
Your constant efforts to demonize anyone who subscribes to even a moderate conservative political opinion do not contribute to sound astrology.
Isn't it common sense that property damage is assessed by insurance appraisers and adjusters, not by untrained journalists-- let alone by social media mavens?
Do you think Harvard University research studies are fake news? What about fact-checking sites?
Your carping against BLM seems vaguely racist to me. I am not calling you a racist, but saying that you seem unconcerned and even unaware of the root problems BLM supporters try to address.
Your constant efforts to demonize anyone who subscribes to even a moderate conservative political opinion do not contribute to sound astrology.
Last edited: