Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Welcome!
Read My Chart
Trying to figure out the Nodes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Olivia" data-source="post: 262788" data-attributes="member: 9261"><p>You could use Placidus. The article is mostly from Bonatti and Masha'allah. I'm not entirely convinced that Masha'allah was using whole sign exclusively, though I know he used them for most things, and I know Bonatti used Alchabitius mostly, and whole sign for some things, Lilly I'm pretty sure used Regiomontanus for everything, but use Placidus if it suits you. If it works for you, then stick with it.</p><p></p><p>It's what everyone else did, after all <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>But you might want to take a look at the whole sign as well as the division - it's easy enough to do. My whole sign nodes are even more grim than my quadrant ones - but they're both true. </p><p></p><p>Here's the thing - unless you have a miraculous stroke of luck, you're going to find little in the literature, be it traditional or modern, that describes your aspect or planet or node placement to the proverbial 'T'. You've got a planet or planets conjunct a node if I remember right, so that's going to complicate things, too. </p><p></p><p>Use the delineations as a base to build on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Olivia, post: 262788, member: 9261"] You could use Placidus. The article is mostly from Bonatti and Masha'allah. I'm not entirely convinced that Masha'allah was using whole sign exclusively, though I know he used them for most things, and I know Bonatti used Alchabitius mostly, and whole sign for some things, Lilly I'm pretty sure used Regiomontanus for everything, but use Placidus if it suits you. If it works for you, then stick with it. It's what everyone else did, after all :) But you might want to take a look at the whole sign as well as the division - it's easy enough to do. My whole sign nodes are even more grim than my quadrant ones - but they're both true. Here's the thing - unless you have a miraculous stroke of luck, you're going to find little in the literature, be it traditional or modern, that describes your aspect or planet or node placement to the proverbial 'T'. You've got a planet or planets conjunct a node if I remember right, so that's going to complicate things, too. Use the delineations as a base to build on. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Welcome!
Read My Chart
Trying to figure out the Nodes
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top