Dima Gur
Well-known member
1.) Always am flabbergasted when I have a horary with the following condition:
Planet A perfects an aspect to planet C first, by degrees (time units).
Planet B perfect an aspect to planet C first, by real time / ephemeris time.
I'm rather certain that the first condition (by degrees) would be the proper way of looking at things from a textbook / tradition point of view.
Alas, this is sometimes difficult for me, as the chart is supposed to shows events which happen by a certain chronological sequence.
When you adopt such an approach the second point of view suddenly becomes enticing.
What do you lean to, when such a situation presents itself and when all three planets are major significators in the question.
(say it was a relationship question of Joe (planet A) wants to win over Sally (planet C), and Tom (planet B) barges in all of a sudden)
2.) Had a few horary relationship questions, in two of which L1 and L7 were separating (by opposition, no less).
I used traditional orb definitions, according to Deborah Houlding’s table of orbs, in order to predict how much time will pass till the relationship will fall apart.
Say The moon was in 6-deg Virgo and Saturn was in 1-deg Pisces; delineated as possible final-breakup in 5.5 time units (was weeks if you have to ask).
That's because the orb between the two is 10.5 degrees.
Do you ever use orbs in such a way in horary or natal? (I know this is the horary forum, but please be forgiving).
Here are the orb tables:
3.) If you're a professional astrologer, how often do you do follow ups for your horary readings?
---
Thanks for participating in the discussion
Planet A perfects an aspect to planet C first, by degrees (time units).
Planet B perfect an aspect to planet C first, by real time / ephemeris time.
I'm rather certain that the first condition (by degrees) would be the proper way of looking at things from a textbook / tradition point of view.
Alas, this is sometimes difficult for me, as the chart is supposed to shows events which happen by a certain chronological sequence.
When you adopt such an approach the second point of view suddenly becomes enticing.
What do you lean to, when such a situation presents itself and when all three planets are major significators in the question.
(say it was a relationship question of Joe (planet A) wants to win over Sally (planet C), and Tom (planet B) barges in all of a sudden)
2.) Had a few horary relationship questions, in two of which L1 and L7 were separating (by opposition, no less).
I used traditional orb definitions, according to Deborah Houlding’s table of orbs, in order to predict how much time will pass till the relationship will fall apart.
Say The moon was in 6-deg Virgo and Saturn was in 1-deg Pisces; delineated as possible final-breakup in 5.5 time units (was weeks if you have to ask).
That's because the orb between the two is 10.5 degrees.
Do you ever use orbs in such a way in horary or natal? (I know this is the horary forum, but please be forgiving).
Here are the orb tables:
Skyscript study aids: Traditional Orb Tables
Tables to indicate the orb limits for aspectual contact
www.skyscript.co.uk
3.) If you're a professional astrologer, how often do you do follow ups for your horary readings?
---
Thanks for participating in the discussion
Last edited:
