Really? Do you actually know Blain? Are you a friend of his?
Did you read what I wrote above?
I've never met him in person,.
Oh, btw. I'm also related to members of the Bean family tree.
You would need to talk to MARC EDUMUND JONES about that, BUT he’s long dead. No one will ever know.
Samantha Bean is my Astrologer’s Community name. I don’t use it anywhere else. A nom du plume, so to speak.
If you don’t use anonymous names on forums, people trace you down and talk about your heritage and other stuff. i had enough of that during the early use of forums in the 1990’s. Pretty soon they start making threatening comments and say they are going to visit your home. Samantha Bean is not a real person; its an anonymous name. Blain Bovee does not know any Samantha Bean’s.
Unless you are a member of a famous mid western rock band, I doubt whether your name is really Pierce(middle name “the”) Vale.
I can't help it if my comments don't sound like Blain, but why would they? They're my comments...!
I have little other choice then to share those emails he sent me, you can even check the email address to see if it is one and the same that you know is possessed by Blain, although I have no way of knowing if it is still active, or if Blain is "active" himself?
I hope this is humor, or else you may have simply missed the point.
No, I'm quite serious. I got your "point", which is you are trying to cast derision publicly upon me by roundaboutly claiming that I never have corresponded with Blain as you did state, "Your comments don’t sound much like the Blain Bovee I know. And unlike you, I do know him. We haven’t talked for awhile. He lives in Canada, and the Pandemic has had that off limits to an American."
I didn't say that I didn't know him, I wrote that i have never met Him in person. What I did get to know about him through the emails He sent to me IS ALL I NEED TO KNOW
So you completely dismiss my work of the last 38 years and in particular the research I have done that is documented and published in my book?
SDH3: I haven't seen and thus haven't read your book. That said, I think you're being a bit hyper-sensitive. I've been on this forum for 12 years and so know something of your voluminous work and research. FWIW, I wasn't including you or anyone in this group in that remark. Odd that you'd assume so.
PTV: Perhaps you'd care to review it and rethink your statement?