Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="JUPITERASC" data-source="post: 1171350" data-attributes="member: 6273"><p><h3><strong><span style="color: rgb(41, 105, 176)">MUNDANE ASTROLOGY </span></strong></h3><p><span style="color: rgb(41, 105, 176)"><strong>8th HOUSE </strong></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(41, 105, 176)"><strong></strong></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(41, 105, 176)"><strong>PUBLIC DEATHS </strong></span></p><h3></h3><h3><span style="color: rgb(41, 105, 176)"><strong>Lockdowns Actually Saved SHOCKINGLY Few Lives  <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> </strong></span></h3><h3><strong><span style="color: rgb(41, 105, 176)">– Fake Fact Checkers DEBUNKED  </span></strong></h3><p><strong><span style="color: rgb(41, 105, 176)">The lockdowns made the rich even richer.  Mission accomplished!</span></strong></p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]1R-2DpXOiWU[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p><strong><span style="color: rgb(41, 105, 176)">When Johns Hopkins Economics Professor Steve Hanke released a metastudy </span></strong></p><p><span style="color: rgb(41, 105, 176)"><strong>indicating that COVID lockdowns had only saved a small number of lives </strong></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(41, 105, 176)"><strong>compared to the astronomical figure </strong></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(41, 105, 176)"><strong>that had been reported by an Imperial College study</strong></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(41, 105, 176)"><strong>the backlash was quick and fevered. </strong></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(41, 105, 176)"><strong>The Imperial College researchers, along with "...fact checkers..." like Snopes</strong></span></p><p> <span style="color: rgb(41, 105, 176)"><strong>sought to refute the claims Hanke and his co-authors made. </strong></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(41, 105, 176)"><strong>Jimmy interviews Professor Hanke, who explains what his antagonists got wrong</strong></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(41, 105, 176)"><strong>how the vast majority of their criticisms were misplaced, at best</strong></span></p><p><strong><span style="color: rgb(41, 105, 176)">and what minor corrections to their results had been made in subsequent releases. </span></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>

Verification: How many letters are in the word 'astrology'?

This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

Accept Learn more…

Top