Paris and Conspiracy Theories


Well-known member
I mean that is entirely dependent on your opinion :)smile:)



Many experts disagree with the above comments.

9/11 demolition theory challenged

An analysis of the World Trade Center collapse has challenged a conspiracy theory surrounding the 9/11 attacks.
The study by a Cambridge University engineer demonstrates that once the collapse of the twin towers began, it was destined to be rapid and total.

"this "scientist" doesn't even begin to explain how the kerosene fire could have brought down the tower.he simply try's to explain how the tower could have collapsed to look like a controlled demolition.
he said this is a "reasonable assumption"
assumptions are not scientific facts
her re scientist reasonsfor the impossibility of the tower collapsing as the NWOtrys to establish
PDX 9/11 Truth - Leuren Moret Depleted Uranium and 9/11
9 11 Depleted uranium, Radiation Exposure, World Trade Center PATH Bathtub, Yellow Trucks
9/11 Nano-Thermite, Nuclear Electromagenetic and Radiation Evidence
Architects and engineers say 9/11 twin tower collapse was not possible
Firefighters, Architects & Engineers Expose 9/11 Myths (2015)
here one for you katydid
9/11 Debunker Gets His *** Handed To Him By Richard Gage - 20/07/2009



Staff member
Whenever I see a long list of scientists that dispute or support a claim, I can't help but think of the following group of noted scientists:

In 1975 Bok and the philosopher Paul Kurtz gathered together “186 leading scientists, including 19 Nobel Laureates,” to sign a statement, “Objections to Astrology.” Published initially in The Humanist and then republished as a book and in various forms in Science News and covered in the NY Times, the statement became something of a manifesto for scientists who pointed to it as the final and unassailable refutation of astrology.

Look ^^^ what happens when scientific minds put their pointed heads together in agreement against something they disagree with. :alien:


Well-known member


We grabbed the fence railing of the cemetery - looked through the grate at Trade Center
Stanley said: "You know, I think those buildings could go down."
I said: "There is no way.Those are steel structures. That's furniture and paper and carpeting and draperies and things like that that are burning."
I didn't finish the sentence when Tower Two started to slide down.
I would say that we'd been out of the building maybe five minutes when the building collapsed.
It disappeared into its own dust


Well-known member
Niels Harrit is an Associate Professor of chemistry at the University of Copenhagen :smile:
His presentation will include a factual account of the destruction of the World Trade Center
that took place on September 11th 2001 in New York.

After visiting the Ground Zero site and examining the dust produced by the destruction of the towers,
Niels and eight other scientists found large quantities of active thermitic material, which is normally found in explosives.

As well as discussing the twin towers
and how he believes that it was not possible for them to have collapsed after being hit by the two airplanes,
Niels will also be talking about the lesser known Building 7,
which was also destroyed that day.
No former scientific knowledge is needed