Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Astrology
Natal Astrology
Aspects & configurations
Orbs and Stuff
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Krewster" data-source="post: 504703" data-attributes="member: 38043"><p style="text-align: left">[FONT=&#44404][/FONT] </p> <p style="text-align: left">[FONT=&#44404]This sticky pre-dates my membership and sorry if I'm too late.[/FONT]</p><p></p><p style="text-align: left">[FONT=&#44404]Rather than caring about cut-offs, I'm getting a lot more juice these days from focusing on the rate(s) by which an influence strengthens and weakens within, say, a 3 + 3 degree range from exact (and whether, beyond that, many aspects might not be more than the fading trail on a pop song's audio volume envelope or, heaven forbid, a proximate minor aspect).[/FONT]</p><p></p><p>[FONT=&#44404]Kudos to those also honoring the effect of non-mathematical factors on such rates (e.g., planet strength, etc.; seems alot to take in) and I wonder where are the members with developed opinions about the rates based solely on orb strength (I'll stick in this camp for a little while longer with working assumptions such as that the rate is noticeable immediately beyond exact and has a speed bump somewhere around 2.x degrees)[/FONT]</p><p> </p><p> </p><p style="text-align: left">[FONT=&#44404]Just saying the things to focus on prior to the cut-off (e.g., is the rate linear or logarithmic) seem more interesting than the cut-off itself (which may remain relevant only in tweaking your aspect set what to display).[/FONT]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Krewster, post: 504703, member: 38043"] [LEFT][FONT=굴][/FONT] [FONT=굴]This sticky pre-dates my membership and sorry if I'm too late.[/FONT][/LEFT] [LEFT][FONT=굴]Rather than caring about cut-offs, I'm getting a lot more juice these days from focusing on the rate(s) by which an influence strengthens and weakens within, say, a 3 + 3 degree range from exact (and whether, beyond that, many aspects might not be more than the fading trail on a pop song's audio volume envelope or, heaven forbid, a proximate minor aspect).[/FONT][/LEFT] [FONT=굴]Kudos to those also honoring the effect of non-mathematical factors on such rates (e.g., planet strength, etc.; seems alot to take in) and I wonder where are the members with developed opinions about the rates based solely on orb strength (I'll stick in this camp for a little while longer with working assumptions such as that the rate is noticeable immediately beyond exact and has a speed bump somewhere around 2.x degrees)[/FONT] [LEFT][FONT=굴]Just saying the things to focus on prior to the cut-off (e.g., is the rate linear or logarithmic) seem more interesting than the cut-off itself (which may remain relevant only in tweaking your aspect set what to display).[/FONT][/LEFT] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Astrology
Natal Astrology
Aspects & configurations
Orbs and Stuff
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top