Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Anything Else...
Chat
News Astrology and Mundane Events
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="blackbery" data-source="post: 1172141" data-attributes="member: 53419"><p><h3>The Cassidy Hutchinson Testimony Brings Down Two Targets – </h3><h3>The J-6 Committee and the Press</h3><p></p><p></p><p>It is astounding not just how poorly the latest day of testimony from the January 6 Commission turned out but how quickly things unraveled. </p><p></p><p>They presented Cassidy Hutchinson before the cameras with all the pride of parents at a country club coming-out cotillion, and it has become a laughable mess for all involved. </p><p>The media have gone bonkers with her discredited testimony and some believe she deserves a medal for lying.😏😏😏</p><p>The lack of pragmatic analysis is stark here. </p><p></p><p><strong><em>The J-6 Commission has also exposed itself as inept as a result of yesterday's testimony. The presence of guns as described is said to be a bombshell revelation, but how are Hutchinson's words of hearsay regarded as so important today? It means that after a full year of investigation – with copious hours of video footage from security cameras, cell phones, and police body cams – no one had previously picked up on all these guns at the scene before yesterday. It also means that the secret service failed in their duty to protect the president.</em></strong></p><p><strong><em>Why was no one with visible weapons arrested, as they were violating the open-carry law in D.C.? </em></strong></p><p><strong><em>How would the president have been permitted to give his speech with guns present in the area?</em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em>It's because it never happened; there were no guns. The president did not attack his service detail and he never lunged at</em></strong></p><p><strong><em>the steering wheel to drive to the Capitol. </em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em>Hutchinson a proven liar over and over again.😭😭😭</em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em>Secret Service are willing to go public with a disputed version of events but Jan 6 not interested in the truth or</em></strong></p><p><strong><em>evidence; it exposes the show trial dramatics at play with this outfit. </em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><em><strong>In a way, it might be said this does end up becoming a bombshell testimony. It is looking more like something that blows up in the face of those on the committee and members of the press. </strong></em></p><p></p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://townhall.com/fakenewsunderarticle[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="blackbery, post: 1172141, member: 53419"] [HEADING=2]The Cassidy Hutchinson Testimony Brings Down Two Targets – [/HEADING] [HEADING=2]The J-6 Committee and the Press[/HEADING] It is astounding not just how poorly the latest day of testimony from the January 6 Commission turned out but how quickly things unraveled. They presented Cassidy Hutchinson before the cameras with all the pride of parents at a country club coming-out cotillion, and it has become a laughable mess for all involved. The media have gone bonkers with her discredited testimony and some believe she deserves a medal for lying.😏😏😏 The lack of pragmatic analysis is stark here. [B][I]The J-6 Commission has also exposed itself as inept as a result of yesterday's testimony. The presence of guns as described is said to be a bombshell revelation, but how are Hutchinson's words of hearsay regarded as so important today? It means that after a full year of investigation – with copious hours of video footage from security cameras, cell phones, and police body cams – no one had previously picked up on all these guns at the scene before yesterday. It also means that the secret service failed in their duty to protect the president. Why was no one with visible weapons arrested, as they were violating the open-carry law in D.C.? How would the president have been permitted to give his speech with guns present in the area? It's because it never happened; there were no guns. The president did not attack his service detail and he never lunged at the steering wheel to drive to the Capitol. Hutchinson a proven liar over and over again.😭😭😭 Secret Service are willing to go public with a disputed version of events but Jan 6 not interested in the truth or evidence; it exposes the show trial dramatics at play with this outfit. [/I][/B] [I][B]In a way, it might be said this does end up becoming a bombshell testimony. It is looking more like something that blows up in the face of those on the committee and members of the press. [/B][/I] [URL unfurl="true"]https://townhall.com/fakenewsunderarticle[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What letter does the name of this site starts with?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Anything Else...
Chat
News Astrology and Mundane Events
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
