News Astrology and Mundane Events

leomoon

leomoon

Well-known member
YESTERDAY'S RECAP:

Former Georgia election worker reveals 'USB' her mother shared was ginger mint​

By Callie Patteson
The "USB drive" that Rudy Giuliani and former President Donald Trump repeatedly claimed Georgia elections worker Wandrea "Shay" Moss and her mother passed to each other while working in a ballot-counting arena was actually a "ginger mint."
"One of the videos we just watched, Mr. Giuliani accused you and your mother of passing some sort of USB drive to each other," Jan. 6 committee member Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) asked during Tuesday's hearing. ***it turned out to be a ginger mint!

nypost.com

Jan. 6 hearings live updates, Day 4: Georgia election workers describe life after Trump’s fraud accusations

Follow the New York Post’s live updates of Day 4 of the January 6 hearings as the House committee grills state election officials.
nypost.com nypost.com


AND AS NORMAL - TRUMP AVOIDS "SPELLCHECK" ON "TRUTHSOCIAL" site:



(doesn't he have spell check like everyone else has?)
1655920378283.png
 
B

blackbery

Well-known member

Donald Trump Has Demanded Equal Time With the J6 Committee...​

And They May Have To Give It To Him…​


For going on 17 long months now, a fake narrative has been furiously pushed on the country by people desperate to deny and to hide the facts about the 2020 Presidential election having been rigged and stolen.

Why, the facts about January 6’s timeline are now so incontrovertible that even Rachel Maddow - RACHEL…MADDOW! - had to admit on the air that Donald Trump was still speaking at the Ellipse on the National Mall when the assault on the Capitol Building began.

READ the 12 PAGE STATEMENT BY PRESIDENT TRUMP REGARDING THE ILLEGAL JAN 6 STALIN TRIAL.




Donald J. Trump - with an Executive Order< seemed to have prepared the ground for demanding equal time with the J6 Committee.

You can read about the EO Trump signed here. And read the full text of the EO here.

You can read the letter that Barr sent to then-Vice President Mike Pence on the proposed Section 230 reform here.






DJT is a frigging genius!:giggle::giggle::giggle:
 
leomoon

leomoon

Well-known member
Ethics Investigation into Oath Keeper's Lawyers and who they are being paid by:
www.nbcnews.com

Prosecutors seek probe of whether Trump-allied lawyer is funding Oath Keepers defense

The Justice Department cited reports alleging that legal fees are being paid by an entity controlled by Sidney Powell, who played a key role in Trump’s effort to overturn the 2020 election.
www.nbcnews.com www.nbcnews.com

U.S. prosecutors asked a judge on Wednesday to launch an ethics inquiry into whether defense lawyers for prominent members of the right-wing Oath Keepers are improperly allowing an attorney closely allied with former President Donald Trump to help pay their legal fees.

The Justice Department’s court filing cited media reports alleging that the legal fees for Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes are being paid by Defending the Republic, an entity controlled by Sidney Powell, an attorney who played a key role in Trump’s attempt to overturn his election defeat. The group is also paying fees for Oath Keeper defendants Kelly Meggs, Connie Meggs and Kenneth Harrelson, it said.


The payments, if true, could violate professional conduct rules limiting compensation methods for attorneys in the District of Columbia, prosecutors said

Who is she? (The Kraken Lady):
Powell is suspected of raiding money from a nonprofit that is said to be paying the defense fees for Jan. 6 insurrectionists.

 
Last edited:
leomoon

leomoon

Well-known member
david starling said:
Who came up with the weird term, "unselects"?
Click to expand...
him, dj; he thinks he's funny ; his Maga followers love it, and keeps them around mimicking him much like pre-teens do.

www.cnn.com

READ: Text messages Sean Hannity, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Ivanka Trump and others sent to Mark Meadows

CNN has obtained 2,319 text messages that former President Donald Trump's White House chief of staff Mark Meadows sent and received between Election Day 2020 and President Joe Biden's January 20, 2021 inauguration.
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com

Texts between the inner circle may come up tomorrow ....again. They'll add Ginni Thomas to the list of texts to Mark Meadows

Justice Clarence Thomas’ wife urged overturning the 2020 election: report​

(her husband did so in the only dissenting vote for trump): https://nypost.com/2022/03/24/justi...verturning-the-2020-election-in-texts-report/
 
Last edited:
leomoon

leomoon

Well-known member
Ginni Thomas was part of a cult and was de-programmed decades ago, before she joined Q-Anon. She apparently believed in Kraken as well, and other Q Anon- nonsense conspiracies:

The Cult was called "Lifespring"
www.newsweek.com

Ginni Thomas discusses struggles after leaving "cult" in resurfaced video

"I want to expose Lifespring, I want to keep other people from going through that experience," Ginni Thomas says in the video.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com
 
leomoon

leomoon

Well-known member
I think I did a chart for Ginni Thomas earlier - but here is an older article from when she called her husband's victim of the sexual attack - Professor Anita Hill - and Thomas's chart was delineated:


Looks like she has Pisces Sun with Scorpio rx Venus - which caused her to act out with some harsh transits that day - (if you want to dig it out)
 
D

david starling

Well-known member
My opinion is, that the only charge that could really stick concerning Trump's personal involvement in the Jan. 6th "incident", is "Knowingly and deliberately inciting a riot".

Being found guilty of that, he could then be held legally accountable for the deaths and destruction caused by the riot he incited.

I think that's the best outcome, as insufficient as it is, that can realistically be accomplished by these hearings.
 
D

david starling

Well-known member
The Secret Service HAD ALREADY informed him in NO UNCERTAIN TERMS that he WOULDN'T be allowed to march with the "WILL BE WILD" mob he'd convened. So, he was BLATANTLY lying when he told them he would. His speech was CLEARLY incendiary. Despite how slimy he is, I don't see how he can possibly slither out of being convicted of inciting a riot.
 
B

blackbery

Well-known member
BREAKING: A federal grand jury has returned a 21-count indictment against Democrat Andrew Gillum for Conspiracy, Wire Fraud, And Making False Statements related to his campaign that he lost to Ron DeSantis


11:14 AM · Jun 22, 2022


The country dodged such a bullet. If Gillum had won we'd probably still be in various stages of lockdown because there would have been no Gov. DeSantis to say "wait, this is stupid."
 
leomoon

leomoon

Well-known member
david starling said:
My opinion is, that the only charge that could really stick concerning Trump's personal involvement in the Jan. 6th "incident", is "Knowingly and deliberately inciting a riot".

Being found guilty of that, he could then be held legally accountable for the deaths and destruction caused by the riot he incited.

I think that's the best outcome, as insufficient as it is, that can realistically be accomplished by these hearings.
Click to expand...
Everyone who is anyone in the legal realm, including Law Professors, have been rather irritated to the max on Twitter that that AG Merrick Garland has dragged his feet on this one, well over a year now, and decided after that long to not even prosecute the two that the Committee sent him 18 months ago for not cooperating with the subpoena. It just occurred to me something no one has mentioned yet. When he first came into office after Barr - everyone said he was similar to Barr in many ways. Not long thereafter, he inserted himself, in a case that had been going on for 3 yrs against trump sought by a woman who had been raped in an upscale Dept.Store he knew in New York, E.Jeanne Carroll, the wife of a TV reporter at the time, and herself, a columnist. She took him to court because he called her a liar. Garland decided when he came into office that trump shouldn't have to pay to defend himself, for his own lawyers :unsure: because he called her a liar when h e was President - so it was up to the taxpayers to pay for his lawyers (if you can believe this man's thinking) ..........forget the rape, and the semen stained dress she saved for the DNA test the judge had ordered tested) He ordered all new prosecutors to change the courts... MEANWHILE at the DOJ.,, he's now in Ukraine, teaching them how to prosecute big War crimes:
www.newsweek.com

Why Merrick Garland is unlikely to indict Donald Trump

The U.S. attorney general is facing pressure to charge the former president with a crime over January 6, but doing so may result in unprecedented backlash according to an expert.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com
:rolleyes:
 
B

blackbery

Well-known member
It's a good, good day for Justice in America today.

  • Today, we filed an Amended Complaint with several additional defendants, including Adam Schiff and Rod Rosenstein, that incorporates all of the damning information that was uncovered throughout the course of the Sussmann trial.
  • Collectively, the defendants will be held accountable for their brazen efforts to defraud the American people and undermine our democracy. @realDonaldTrump
 
leomoon

leomoon

Well-known member
david starling said:
Then it's Biden's fault for appointing Garland. Any reason you know for why he chose Garland?
Click to expand...
The old "friends will be friends" in old boy politics he is fond of.
They passed on him for the Supreme Court remember? McConnell pulled a dirty trick during the last term of the Obama years.
He would have been perfect on the Supreme court, because he is as slow as molasses. ....truly perfect, much like the rest of them there

He actually was a moderate if not conservative judge:
www.npr.org

What Happened With Merrick Garland In 2016 And Why It Matters Now

Back then, Mitch McConnell boasted: "One of my proudest moments was when I looked Barack Obama in the eye and I said, 'Mr. President, you will not fill the Supreme Court vacancy.' "
www.npr.org www.npr.org
 
leomoon

leomoon

Well-known member
David: I'm a strong believer in what goes around comes around (i.e. karma), and McConnell and the rest of them who were so very dishonest will eventually pay).......its only a matter of time.

I'm just glad I"m not them.

This lifetime is a heartbeat, a flutter in the eyelash of god and the truth. We'll all see that soon enough :) And the golden idol will find out he wasn't god afterall.
 
D

david starling

Well-known member
Speaking of the Supreme Court, the ultra-conservative Catholic Bishops in the U.S. have launched a long planned frontal assault on the "Separation of Church and State" concept implied, but unfortunately not clearly defined, by the "Establishment Clause" in the 1st Amendment. And, they're using the Conservative Catholics on the Supreme Court as their instrument.

Which is a shame, because the majority of American Catholics are not in agreement with them. It's a tyranny of the minority.
 
leomoon

leomoon

Well-known member
Common concensus is, that since a Maine case was just settled by the Court in favor of a Catholic School patron to receive tuitiion from the State which was never done before, this then opens up a whole new can of worms for new legal cases. Nothing that the so-called Founding Fathers had in mind. Separation of the Church and the State.

abcnews.go.com

Supreme Court says Maine cannot bar religious schools from state tuition program

The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that the state of Maine must allow parents who receive taxpayer-funded tuition assistance payments to use them at religious schools.
abcnews.go.com abcnews.go.com

6-3 For - - allowing assistance to Catholic School -

Judge Sonia Sotomoyor writes scathing dissent

This decision is “especially perverse,” she added, “because the benefit at issue is the public education to which all of Maine’s children are entitled under the State Constitution. As this court has long recognized, the Establishment Clause requires that public education be secular and neutral as to religion.”


She concludes: “What a difference five years makes. In 2017, I feared that the court was ‘lead(ing) us … to a place where separation of church and state is a constitutional slogan, not a constitutional commitment.’ Today, the court leads us to a place where separation of church and state becomes a constitutional violation.”
baptistnews.com

Church-state separationists join Justice Sotomayor in blasting the Supreme Court’s ruling in a Maine school voucher case – Baptist News Global

Church-state separationists lambasted a June 21 decision of the United States Supreme Court that granted parents in Maine access to taxpayer-funded vouchers to send their children to private religious schools.
baptistnews.com baptistnews.com
 
Last edited:
D

david starling

Well-known member
To be fair, it was President Eisenhower, a devout Presbyterian under the tutelage of pastor Billy Graham, who already destroyed the "wall of separation between Church and State". He got the words "under God" inserted into our Pledge of Allegiance, and made "In God We Trust" the official motto of the United States.
 
Top