military dictadorship inthe u.s.



Guys” Are Illegally Pushing for Door-to-Door Confiscation Through Red Flag Polices – Not Law! Learn From History: Bradlee Dean +Videos
Monday, April 1, 2019 15:48


By Bradlee Dean / Sons of Liberty Media
“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.” – William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783
In the light of what just allegedly happened in New Zealand, one might ask themselves the question, why it is that their acting government would attempt to disarm their own citizenry instead of arming them to protect themselves against armed assailants (Luke 11:21-22)?
Furthermore, why is their acting government detaining and charging their own citizens for sharing the video of this alleged massacre? After all, it was broadcasted LIVE on Facebook!


Could it be that this alleged massacre in New Zealand had inconstancies found in the film that they did not want anyone to see?
Could it be that New Zealanders thought it a little odd that their prime minister, while wearing a hijab immediately after the shooting, stated that “Our gun laws will change.” Within just six days, they banned military-style firearms.
Maybe they thought it telling when the CIA-controlled media lied while promulgating that the masses are turning in their guns (A tactic to belittle opposition), when in fact, their gun control measures completely backfired.
The Sons of Liberty reports,
Tyler Durden explains that this is not the norm and that Kiwis are not complying, for the most part, with the ban.
Out of an estimated 1.2 million registered guns, New Zealand police report that as of Tuesday night, 37 firearms have been surrendered nationwide, according to BuzzFeed.
No accounting was provided of how many people owned those guns, the types of firearms, or where they were surrendered.
The reports of citizens disarming themselves came after a Monday announcement by Prime minister Jacinda Ardern that several “in principle decisions” on gun control have been made by Cabinet ministers, while praising residents who have surrendered their guns to police.
Ardern asked residents to surrender their weapons on Monday.
“To make our community safer, the time to act is now,” she said. “I want to remind people, you can surrender your gun to the police at any time. In fact I have seen reports that people are in fact already doing this. I applaud that effort, and if you are thinking about surrendering your weapon, I would encourage you to do so.”
Again, and in parallel to the shooting in Parkland, Florida, behind the ‘March For Our Lives” (Permits were issued 2 months before this school shooting in order to march in Washington), 55 new gun control laws were passed in 26 states by a majority of Republican governors. Take note, as the Denver Post points out, this massive push for gun control has bipartisan support. In fact, the majority of governors who signed in new gun control measures were Republicans.
Now, we are seeing the alleged “good guys” like Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham beginning to push for Red Flag laws, which are not law. “Shall not be infringed” means shall not be infringed (2nd Amendment of the Bill of RIGHTS). In the end, this will move to door to door gun confiscations if these criminals are not lawfully stopped.
Consider what this new administration is doing to Americans today could have never been done under that of criminal Barack Hussein Obama’s administration. Never. Now, we are dealing with those who you have been led to believe are the good guys, you know the Republican conservatives, advocating illegal Red Flag laws. Call it what you will, it matters not, it is all unlawful activity. Where are these said representatives that are attempting to disarm you in America deriving this authority from? It is not from “We the People!”
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government – lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.” ― Patrick Henry
“The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.” – Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788
If you take the time to investigate many of these massacres, you will find, more than not, that many of them are false flags. You can identify the guilty culprits when you see who stands to gain by attempting to disarm, rather than to arm after these massacres take place. Over and over again and across the globe, we are seeing that these alleged massacres happen while the government mysteriously waits in the shadows only to disarm or ban shortly thereafter.
“Never trust a government that doesn’t trust it’s own citizens with guns.” –Benjamin Franklin
You have heard it said, never let a good crisis go to waste. Well, you need to begin to ask yourselves who is responsible for the crisis (Jeremiah 11:9)?
Governments, on a daily basis, somehow accuse law-abiding citizens, through totalitarian methods, for what the guilty are responsible for.
Another question that one should ask themselves is, who gains from these massacres? Well again, the government stands in the shadows only to disarm the people and what is worse than all of that is those who are legislating illegally are advocating disarmament while surrounded with fully armed security details protecting themselves from the people that they are to serve.

Now, we are even beginning to see door to door confiscations. One must remember that it is no longer law enforcement at this point. You are now dealing with agents of the state that are not doing their jobs, but are now violating their oaths (Psalm 94:20). History teaches us what happens to people in many countries after disarmament takes place, the answer is genocide! This is a fact that no one can dispute.
Furthermore, if you trust in a government that sanctions the murder of its own children (Proverbs 6:17) to represent you, then you have ignorantly taken on that which runs counter to that of American Government. Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
Josef Stalin, the sole leader of the Soviet Union from 1924 to 1953, said:
“If the opposition disarms, well and good. If it refuses to disarm, we shall disarm it ourselves.”
In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Mao Tze Tung, communist dictator of China said:
“War can only be abolished through war, and in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun.”
China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Idi Amin, president of Uganda from 1971 to 1979, said:
“I do not want to be controlled by any superpower. I myself consider myself the most powerful figure in the world, and that is why I do not let any superpower control me.”
Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Pol Pot, who created in Cambodia one of the 20th century’s most brutal and radical regimes, was responsible for killing one million of his own ‘educated,’ yet unarmed citizens.

Yet in America, the parents in the 86% ratio that are dropping their kids off in public schools to be illegally indoctrinated by the federal government through a violation of the Tenth Amendment now have some students so dumbed down that they are shouting “No more guns.”

For the record, I hate violence. I mean I hate it, but there comes a time when enough is enough, no more and resistance comes into play. This is illegal and criminal at every given incremental step that these agents of the state are taking and it comes to a point where either you are going to throw off those who pervert the Constitution and its plain declarations or you will once again be enslaved (Deuteronomy 28:63). That is the lessons and examples that our forefathers have left us.
“What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787


Raw Story

<B><H1 class="mvp-post-title left entry-title" itemprop="headline">Critics lament as 126 House Democrats join forces with GOP to hand Trump ‘terrifying’ mass domestic spying powers</H1>


Privacy advocates and civil liberties defenders are expressing outrage after the Democratic-controlled U.S. House of Representatives on Tuesday night voted down a bipartisan amendment designed to end, as one group put it, the U.S. government’s “most egregious mass surveillance practices” first revealed by National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden.
In a final vote of 253-175, it was 126 Democrats who joined with 127 Republicans to vote against an amendment introduced by Rep Justin Amash (R-Mich.) and Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) that would have closed loopholes in Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that critics charge has allowed the NSA to abuse warrantless surveillance capabilities and target the emails, text messages, and internet activity of U.S. citizens and residents. See the full roll call here.

Among the high-profile Democrats to vote against the bill was Rep. Adam Schiff, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and a frequent and outspoken critic of President Donald Trump.
“It’s good to know that House Democrats like Adam Schiff are ‘resisting’ Trump by voting to ensure that he has limitless authority to conduct mass warrantless surveillance,” said Evan Greer, the deputy director of Fight for the Future, in a statement rebuking those Democrats who sided with the president and the Republicans in voting down the Amash-Lofgren amendment.
While House Democrats otherwise treat Trump as an existential threat who cannot be trusted on any matter, Greer and her group said it was bewildering to see a majority of the party leave such “terrifying” mass surveillance powers in the hands of the president and the intelligence agencies he largely controls.

“The Democrats who voted against this common sense amendment just threw immigrants, LGBTQ folks, activists, journalists, and political dissidents under the bus by voting to rubberstamp the Trump administration’s Orwellian domestic spying capabilities,” said Greer, in a statement.
Not letting Republicans off the hook, however, she said the GOP should “be even more embarrassed” than the Democrats over their vote. House Republicans, added Greer, have “spent months complaining about the Obama administration’s abuses of FISA and then voted for the status quo when they had an actual opportunity to rein in Big Brother.”

As Fight for the Future noted in a tweet, dozens of civil liberties groups had lobbied Congress to pass the Amash-Lofgren amendment ahead of the vote, sending a letter last week urging its passage.

According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which lobbied in favor of the amendment, the effort to rein in the powers contained in Section 702 was crucial to curtail the documented abuses by government agencies and the threat posed by unchecked mass spying. As Matthew Guariglia, an EFF policy analyst, explained in a Tuesday blog post:
Section 702 allows the government to collect and store the communications of foreign intelligence targets outside of the U.S if a significant purpose is to collect “foreign intelligence” information. Although the law contains some protections—for example, a prohibition on knowingly collecting communications between two U.S. citizens on U.S. soil—we have learned that the program actually does sweep up billions of communications involving people not explicitly targeted, including Americans. For example, a 2014 report by the Washington Post that reviewed of a “large cache of intercepted conversations” provided by Edward Snowden revealed that 9 out of 10 account holders “were not the intended surveillance targets but were caught in a net the agency had cast for somebody else.”
The Lofgren-Amash amendment would require the government to acknowledge the protections in the law and to explicitly promise not to engage in “about collection,” the practice of collecting communications that merely mention a foreign intelligence target. About collection has been one of the most controversial aspects of Section 702 surveillance, and although the government ended this practice in 2017, it has consisted claimed the right to restart it.

While Fight for the Future vowed not stop fighting, and noted upcoming fights over domestic surveillance and mass spying, Greer lamented this failed opportunity.
“This amendment would have finally closed legal loopholes that the US government has abused to conduct sickening and pervasive monitoring and collection of the most intimate details of our lives,” she said. “Congress should do their job by defending the constitution and enacting comprehensive legislation to ban mass government spying, outlaw use of facial recognition technology by law enforcement, and hold corporations accountable for collecting and misusing our data.”
AddThis Sharing Buttons Share to FacebookFacebookShare to TwitterTwitterShare to FlipboardFlipboardShare to Copy LinkCopy LinkShare to EmailEmail

Report typos and corrections to

Continue Reading



Well-known member
Re: military dictadorship in the u.s.

Almost a year later on this thread (360 days to be exact), our nation has more political tensions, racial rioting, a president managed to escape impeachment, a pandemic hitting this country the hardest plus an economic loss it caused, war threats against Iran or China (maybe Russia added in) and an increasingly unpopular president tries to get reelected when his approval ratings are getting lower than they were in the last 4 years.

Donald Trump needs to cancel his presidential campaign rally in the 19,000 seat BOK Center in Tulsa, OK next weekend. He's going to spout hatred, racial insensitivity, a dislike of our allies and adversaries, attack Joe Biden who's 20 points ahead of him in election chances public opinion poll, and the Tulsa city or county health department warns him not to hold a large public gathering in a pandemic like COVID-19.

In 2 weeks (July 1-4), we'll have a second wave of COVID-19, more racial rioting, more CHAZs pop up in major cities across the country (Seattle is just the beginning), possible declaration of war against countries' regimes Trump has loathed, the stock market Trump cares about too much keeps declining, and we don't know a presidential election will ever get held in Nov. I sense it's a huge possibility the US will end up in martial law for a number of reasons to keep order and the country safe, but we'll lose our constitutional rights.