Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Astrology
Natal Astrology
Methods of chart interpretation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="serafin5" data-source="post: 304313" data-attributes="member: 12584"><p>I know this is an old thread but I just had to write! I loved the way Epsilon describes his/her problems with chart interpretation because its almost spot on the way I become overwhelmed also, but with a few exceptions. I've actually been a little bit depressed about this. I've been studying Astrology for a long time now and due to a lack of funds and other materials, since joining AW, have been learning only recently certain aspects of Astrology that I frankly knew nothing about! For example, I recently learned that there is quite a difference if the Astrologer believes in the Traditional or the Modernist interpretations of Astrology. I read an excellent post explaining why the Traditional system makes so much sense to me now (no offense to all the Modern Ast. out there). I also just found out that if we don't know how to find the chart's Almuten and know about Triplicities and that day and evening births are ruled by different energies, not to mention what degree within said sign, Trigon, or decante, etc, etc. I've been reading up on all this information and it's been said over and over that knowing this is basically the cornerstone of Astrology! So I've been depressed because I thought I knew Astrology and it turns out; not nearly enough. Oh well, back to the books!</p><p> </p><p>Thanks, AW. I needed to get this off my chest. </p><p> </p><p>Sincerely, Serafin5<img src="https://www.astrologyweekly.com/forum/styles/smilies/sad.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":sad:" title="Sad :sad:" data-shortname=":sad:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="serafin5, post: 304313, member: 12584"] I know this is an old thread but I just had to write! I loved the way Epsilon describes his/her problems with chart interpretation because its almost spot on the way I become overwhelmed also, but with a few exceptions. I've actually been a little bit depressed about this. I've been studying Astrology for a long time now and due to a lack of funds and other materials, since joining AW, have been learning only recently certain aspects of Astrology that I frankly knew nothing about! For example, I recently learned that there is quite a difference if the Astrologer believes in the Traditional or the Modernist interpretations of Astrology. I read an excellent post explaining why the Traditional system makes so much sense to me now (no offense to all the Modern Ast. out there). I also just found out that if we don't know how to find the chart's Almuten and know about Triplicities and that day and evening births are ruled by different energies, not to mention what degree within said sign, Trigon, or decante, etc, etc. I've been reading up on all this information and it's been said over and over that knowing this is basically the cornerstone of Astrology! So I've been depressed because I thought I knew Astrology and it turns out; not nearly enough. Oh well, back to the books! Thanks, AW. I needed to get this off my chest. Sincerely, Serafin5:sad: [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Astrology
Natal Astrology
Methods of chart interpretation
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top