"Measured Points" versus Planets

SunConjunctUranus

Well-known member
Fancy name for mundane, no longer used. The Church considered it sorcery.

Yes, Chruch considered it as sorcery but astrologers did not think so. It's more like an event chart then mundane or 12/12. :biggrin:

If you have any reference on this subject then why not educating other members with your generosity?
 

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
Ds,

What do you know about judicial astrology? Morin talking about this subject.
Fancy name for mundane, no longer used. The Church considered it sorcery.
Yes, Chruch considered it as sorcery but astrologers did not think so
. It's more like an event chart then mundane or 12/12. :biggrin:

If you have any reference on this subject then why not educating other members with your generosity?
JUDICIARY ASTROLOGY A VERY ANCIENT TRADITION :smile:

https://www.museeprotestant.org/en/notice/judiciary-astrology-a-very-ancient-tradition/



JUDICIAL ASTROLOGY https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_astrology
 

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
Dr. farr once posted
that he knew of Traditional references
to a way of determining the Ages, but
that the method used was lost to us.
Ptedious Ptolemys Siriusly Un-Ptidy Desk Q.E.D. :smile:
A lot has been lost.
Especially many of the Alexandrian contributions to astrological matters.
More like wars and religious persecution.
Indeed - traditional astrology suffers persecution :smile:
nevertheless
if dr farr knew of the existence of such a reference
then would be useful to have a link to those references
 

david starling

Well-known member
Ds,

Do you have any reference to ancient tradition for age indicators? Because it's really vital on 12/12.

As you know, I don't really care if it is part of the Traditional tool-box. If it was, as dr. farr mentioned, it almost certainly would have been the sidereal version we have now, utilizing Precession of the Equinox through the sidereal zodiac. No real surprise there, since Ptolemy himself was aware of Equinoctial precession.
This tropical version is something I had to discover for myself, to make sense of the mundane world. It utilizes the Anomalistic Year, which is about Precession of the Perihelion, a Direct-motion through the tropical zodiac. And the Anomalistic Year wasn't available until Johannes Kepler, right near the end of the Traditional Era.The
Modern tropicalists are being grossly inconsistent by continuing to use the version of the Ages that is manifestly and exclusively sidereal.:annoyed:
 

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
As you know, I don't really care if it is part of the Traditional tool-box. If it was, as dr. farr mentioned, it almost certainly would have been the sidereal version we have now, utilizing Precession of the Equinox through the sidereal zodiac. No real surprise there, since Ptolemy himself was aware of Equinoctial precession.
This tropical version is something I had to discover for myself, to make sense of the mundane world. It utilizes the Anomalistic Year, which is about Precession of the Perihelion, a Direct-motion through the tropical zodiac. And the Anomalistic Year wasn't available until Johannes Kepler, right near the end of the Traditional Era.


The Modern tropicalists are being grossly inconsistent
by continuing to use the version of the Ages
that is manifestly and exclusively sidereal
.:annoyed:
Modernist Tropicalists inconsistency is not unusual :smile:
albeit puzzling
as you have indicated
 

SunConjunctUranus

Well-known member
Here is a relevant explanation, I'm sure they will match up well in WCF against Warriors. I hope I could predict the outcome with combination of 12/12 and the ancients.

 
Top