venuschild said:I would love to hear what authors of Antiquity or current authorities have written upon this. And I know you are Well Read!
Quote:
Originally Posted by venuschild
I would love to hear what authors of Antiquity or current authorities have written upon this. And I know you are Well Read!
Certainly.
Book of the Nine Judges pg 176, Sahl.
Book of the Nine Judges pg 181, al-Khayyat
Christian Astrology pg 256, Lilly
Book of Astronomy Treatise 6 pg 422, Bonatti
Hi,There are a couple of other ways (beside Cazimi) a planet can be "conjunct" the Sun yet free from combustion:
1) when the planet and the Sun are "conjunct by latitude" as the oldtimers called it (Al-Biruni, etc): that is, when the Sun and the planet are within about 1 degree (to 1.5 degrees) of declination (both either North or South of the ecliptic) In this circumstance the planet and the Sun might well be quite distant in longidtude and not necessarily either combust nor even under the sunbeams...
2) when the planet and the Sun are "conjunct by nature", a type of conjunction fully recognized as such by the ancients (and even as late as the Renaissance period) in which the Sun and the planet each occupy the exact degree in equipollent signs: for example, say Sun is @ 20 Aries and Jupiter is @ 10 Pisces: they are "conjunct by nature" because each planet is exactly the same distance from the "Line of Truth" (the Aries/Libra line); the Sun and Jupiter in this example are in fact the same as being either longitudinally conjunct or conjunct in latitude (Parallel in Declination), but, of course, Jupiter is nowhere near combust or under the sunbeams.
These concepts go back a long time:
-conjunct in latitude to at least 400 AD
-equipollent conjunction (conjunct by nature) to even earlier Greco/Roman times
Parallel of Declination is applied, strangely enough, more in Modernist astrology than in Traditionalist practice...Conjunct by nature (equipollent conjunction) has been forgotten by almost all practitioners, except perhaps a few of the neo-Hellenistic school.
FREE ONLINE accurate calculatorHi,
It is very interesting that a planet has the same degree as the Sun, but that planet is spared from combustion. How can you know that the planet is combusting in conjunction with the sun? Can you introduce a software or website that calculates?
consider asking on our Read My Chart BoardMy son was born on February 6, 2022, time: 9:30am in esfahan. He has the Sun and Saturn at a distance of 1 degree and 17 minutes in the 11th house of his birth chart and in the sign of Aquarius?does his saturn cumbust? How will this affect his life?
Hi,
It is very interesting that a planet has the same degree as the Sun, but that planet is spared from combustion. How can you know that the planet is combusting in conjunction with the sun? Can you introduce a software or website that calculates?
My son was born on February 6, 2022, time: 9:30am in esfahan. He has the Sun and Saturn at a distance of 1 degree and 17 minutes in the 11th house of his birth chart and in the sign of Aquarius?does his saturn cumbust? How will this affect his life?
Schmidt's fairly recent translation of Antiochus, definition 14,thank you jupiterasc! ill watch the video, i also wanted to ask something.
i just read that if a planet is in its own bounds, the effects of the combustion will be diminished.
I'm no expert - however Robert Schmidt mentioned that - http://www.projecthindsight.com/like say sun is conjunct venus, but venus is in the bounds of venus,
so venus isnt harmed by being near the sun. do you agree with this?
i still dont quite understand the concept of combustion, like i know its bad but then i read stuff about how sun conjunct mercury for example is supposed to be really good and that it can make someone communicative and such, but by the definition of combustion it says that sun conjunct mercury would render mercury useless. and i also would like to know what this does to synastry aspects, because for example sun conjunct venus is supposed to be amazing in synastry yet if the sun is conjunct venus, venus be combust as well right?
"Im not sure how to explain it.... Ive been trying to understand these myself..."I have both Moon and Mercury combust in Leo in H6.. Both are 1 orb from my Sun.
Im not sure how to explain it.... Ive been trying to understand these myself...
There are a couple of other ways (beside Cazimi) a planet can be "conjunct" the Sun yet free from combustion:
1) when the planet and the Sun are "conjunct by latitude" as the oldtimers called it (Al-Biruni, etc): that is, when the Sun and the planet are within about 1 degree (to 1.5 degrees) of declination (both either North or South of the ecliptic) In this circumstance the planet and the Sun might well be quite distant in longidtude and not necessarily either combust nor even under the sunbeams...
2) when the planet and the Sun are "conjunct by nature", a type of conjunction fully recognized as such by the ancients (and even as late as the Renaissance period) in which the Sun and the planet each occupy the exact degree in equipollent signs: for example, say Sun is @ 20 Aries and Jupiter is @ 10 Pisces: they are "conjunct by nature" because each planet is exactly the same distance from the "Line of Truth" (the Aries/Libra line); the Sun and Jupiter in this example are in fact the same as being either longitudinally conjunct or conjunct in latitude (Parallel in Declination), but, of course, Jupiter is nowhere near combust or under the sunbeams.
These concepts go back a long time:
-conjunct in latitude to at least 400 AD
-equipollent conjunction (conjunct by nature) to even earlier Greco/Roman times
MERCURY CAZIMI INFO
Parallel of Declination is applied, strangely enough, more in Modernist astrology than in Traditionalist practice...Conjunct by nature (equipollent conjunction) has been forgotten by almost all practitioners, except perhaps a few of the neo-Hellenistic school.