Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Astrology
Natal Astrology
How to Recognize Physical Beauty
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="StillConfused" data-source="post: 491533" data-attributes="member: 38657"><p>Yesterday I read this thread and it disturbed me to my core, I knew without searching that for every chart of an attractive person showing an aspect of Venus to the Ascendant/chart ruler, there are many that do not have this. I pushed my Aquarian 'craziness' about how everyone is beautiful in different ways, attractiveness being a matter of taste and impossible to determine or measure, to the side, for a definition of attractiveness based on the general opinion of the masses, and set out to find some exceptions to the rule for the thread, and indeed there were some, including Marilyn Monroe, which I see has already been brought to your attention, and you've addressed.</p><p></p><p>I abandoned ship because I was hesitant to make a contribution to this thread, on this touchy subject - and yes, it is touchy, however untouchy we may like it to be - and I was literally falling asleep, but I felt bad. And I would like to rectify that by at least giving my opinion.</p><p></p><p>I am no longer disturbed. It is not racist. It is not sexist. It is not even saying that those who lack these Venus aspects are necessarily denied physical beauty. You've fixed all that. I applaud you for your innovation, and for trying to share what could be an interesting astrological link to physical attractiveness. You meant no harm. I feel that your adamant defence of your Venus theory for women, is unhealthily single-minded, and displays a good example of astrology being manipulated to ineffective use. Never mind a study that shows that women are unable to judge the attractiveness of a man without factoring in success, defences such as nurses possibly (sounded like surely?) recording birth times 20 mins off, leave no room for real answers. I don't understand what you're so convinced about your Venus theory for. Give it time. And facts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="StillConfused, post: 491533, member: 38657"] Yesterday I read this thread and it disturbed me to my core, I knew without searching that for every chart of an attractive person showing an aspect of Venus to the Ascendant/chart ruler, there are many that do not have this. I pushed my Aquarian 'craziness' about how everyone is beautiful in different ways, attractiveness being a matter of taste and impossible to determine or measure, to the side, for a definition of attractiveness based on the general opinion of the masses, and set out to find some exceptions to the rule for the thread, and indeed there were some, including Marilyn Monroe, which I see has already been brought to your attention, and you've addressed. I abandoned ship because I was hesitant to make a contribution to this thread, on this touchy subject - and yes, it is touchy, however untouchy we may like it to be - and I was literally falling asleep, but I felt bad. And I would like to rectify that by at least giving my opinion. I am no longer disturbed. It is not racist. It is not sexist. It is not even saying that those who lack these Venus aspects are necessarily denied physical beauty. You've fixed all that. I applaud you for your innovation, and for trying to share what could be an interesting astrological link to physical attractiveness. You meant no harm. I feel that your adamant defence of your Venus theory for women, is unhealthily single-minded, and displays a good example of astrology being manipulated to ineffective use. Never mind a study that shows that women are unable to judge the attractiveness of a man without factoring in success, defences such as nurses possibly (sounded like surely?) recording birth times 20 mins off, leave no room for real answers. I don't understand what you're so convinced about your Venus theory for. Give it time. And facts. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Astrology
Natal Astrology
How to Recognize Physical Beauty
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top