BTW, is it true that "traditional" yods require the fastest planet to be in the apex?
If so, this isn't a traditional yod with Sat as an apex?
I've read this, too, and I inquired about it in one of the yod threads. I never received a definite answer, but I was surprised to learn that someone whom I trust had read the opposite--that a fast-moving planet cannot be the apex planet of a yod. This completely boggled my mind!
Additionally, I believe this member introduced a valid point: we cannot assume that the planet furthest from the Sun always is the slowest-moving planet in a natal chart. Planets appear to move more slowly through the zodiac at certain stages in their cycle, such as when they approach station. If a planet further from the Sun is in swift, direct motion, it is the faster-moving planet at that point in time.
This may be due to laziness, but I disregard the planet's distance from the Sun as a factor that determines the "validity" of a yod configuration. I am a stickler for orbs, however, and I only consider planets as contributors to an aspect configuration--not angles, asteroids, or BML, unless one of these is conjunct a planet in that configuration.
Suimui, technically there is no inconjunct between Uranus and Saturn, since the orb is wider than 4 degrees. And Sun is not sextile Uranus, since the orb is too wide there.
I agree with R4VEN, although I'd explore other aspects that may contribute to the feelings and experiences you describe.
EDIT: I just noticed that there's a
sesquiquadrate aspect between the Moon and Uranus. Is there any aspect configuration that consists of two planets in a sextile aspect, one oppose a third planet, and the other sesquiquadrate the third planet?
Arian Maverick