Global Warming is a NWO false flag

rahu

Banned
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXxHfb66ZgM

Nobel Laureate in Physics; "Global Warming is Pseudoscience"
Professor Ivar Giaever, the 1973 Nobel Prizewinner for Physics trashes the global warming/climate change/extreme weather pseudoscientific clap-trap and tells Obama he is "Dead Wrong".
This was the 2012 meeting of Nobel Laureates.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0

Nobel Laureate Smashes the Global Warming Hoax
rahu
 
Last edited:

waybread

Well-known member
Ivar Giaever is talking through his hat. His Nobel Prize was awarded in 1973, for research on "experimental discoveries regarding tunnelling phenomena in superconductors."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivar_Giaever

https://skepticalscience.com/ivar-giaever-nobel-physicist-climate-pseudoscientist.html

He has no expertise in meteorology or climatology. At a panel when he was asked to speak on it, he allowed as how he had studied climate change for a day and a half prior to presenting himself as an expert.

C'mon, rahu. You've got to do better than this to make your case. Maybe you'd like to start by studying how the climate actually works.
 

AJ Astrology

Well-known member
I post because other people reading this thread may be persuaded differently.

It would help tremendously if the Global Warming folks weren't so dishonest.

You're in an Inter-Glacial Period. Temperatures are supposed to rise. Glaciers and ice sheets are supposed to melt.

What happened during the Last Inter-Glacial Period?

The NEEM paradox has emerged from an estimated large local warming above the preindustrial level (7.5 ± 1.8 °C at the deposition site 126 kyr ago without correction for any overall ice sheet altitude changes between the LIG and the preindustrial period) based on water isotopes, together with limited local ice thinning, suggesting more resilience of the real Greenland ice sheet than shown in some ice sheet models.

http://www.clim-past.net/12/1933/2016/

7.5°C corresponds to 13.5°F warmer.

Note that the pre-industrial period is pegged at 13.8°C or 56.8°F, so add 56.8°F + 13.5°F = 70.3°F.

And what happened during the Inter-Glacial Period before that?

Estimates indicate that the MIS 11 high sea stand likely was at least + 9 m (relative to present sea level) and could have been as high as + 24 m. The most conservative estimates of palaeo-sea level during MIS 11 would require an ice mass loss equivalent to all of the modern Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets; the more extreme estimates would require additional ice mass loss from the East Antarctic ice sheet.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018213005099?np=y#bb0280Again, that's the norm...that's what is supposed to happen during an Inter-Glacial Period.In fact, data for each of the previous 8 Inter-Glacial Periods proves that temperatures were warmer than present.The question everyone should be asking is, "Why is it colder during this Inter-Glacial Period?"

It is suspicious that the Global Warming crowd refuses to acknowledge those Truths and misleads the general public about the nature of Inter-Glacial Periods.
 

sadge

Well-known member
Hi Tigress Waybread, ha ha!

Apart from fossil fuel, steadily tropical rain forests are going, which convert C02 into Oxygen, there was a time when dragonflies could have 28 inch wingspan, we don't want that but there was much more oxygen then, which helps with growth, however our populations are growing and we need to have air also!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meganisoptera

I love this man.

Monk, you are perfection to me. You always nail it....with few words and a very unique perspective.
 

waybread

Well-known member
AJ Astrology, you need to go back to your climatology studies. Are you familiar with the term Holocene? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene

After the continental ice shelves melted (roughly around 17,000 to 12,000 years ago,) the northern hemisphere climate entered a warmer period, called the Hypsithermal, or Holocene climatic optimum. (which lasted till about 5000 years ago.) Then things cooled off a bit. Then they warmed up a bit by the early Middle Ages. You know, the climate fluctuated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_climatic_optimum

A much cooler period began during the Middle Ages, lasting into the 19th century, nicknamed "the little Ice Age." Conditions varied locally, but for places with alpine glaciers, for example, this was a time when they advanced.

Particularly look at the average temperature graph in this article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age

Because you'll see a big spike, just around the 20th century mark.

Or see the close-up temperature graph in this article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming

Some scientists think that the Little Ice Age would have continued with a cooling trend, were it not for the introduced greenhouse gasses associated with industrialization, automobiles, coal-fired power plants, and so on.

Anyway, there's good information out there if you want to look for it.

Yes, there's lying going on about climate change, but it's not coming from where you think it is.
 
Last edited:

Monk

Premium Member
Sorry Waybread, i called you a TIGRESS, obviously with Moon in Leo, you are a Lioness, however with all that is wrong with the world, i hate that i'm not a vegetarian, i'm a hypocrite to Pythagoras, Big Time Math Teacher in purety!

Pythagoras Quote:- "As long as man continues to be the ruthless destroyer of lower living things,he will never know health or peace. For as long as men massacre animals, they will kill each other. Indeed, he who sows the seed of murder and pain cannot reap joy and love!"

Quote can be found below:-

https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/203707.Pythagoras

Much later the Vegetarian Society was established in UK on 30th September 1847, today the Vegetarian Society isn't mystic, but once was!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetarian_Society

I love Pythagoras in Math, however i'm not a good student, i have little money now to convert!
 
Last edited:

rahu

Banned
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q50Zud-MnI0
renown meteorologist explain the ruse of global warming
start at 7:40 minute mark



the inuit have lived about the arctic circle for 1000's of years. there survival depends on intimate knowledge of their ecosphere
what the have seen is that the sun is rising higher in the sky and heating the ice. this is why it is melting , they also note that the winds to not blow from north to south. for thusands of years they could follow the snow berms created by the wind and in their way amid the unforgiving ice. now the winds blow east to west so that snow berms have changed position and the have had to adapt to the new topography.

here is the video of Inuit elders above the arctic circle revealing the real reason the arctic ice is melting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rR9xMpTb1k
the next is in the inuit elders own language and own words
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HZ_Dvkxi-8

for that matter if co2 is causing the arctic to melt, then the phenomena should be worldwide... but the Antarctic ice shelves are increasing in ice thickness.............


https://www.prisonplanet.com/study-f...mate-data.html

Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climate Data

A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.”

Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published [global average surface temperature (GAST)] data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever – despite current claims of record setting warming,” according to a study published June 27 by two scientists and a veteran statistician.
The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments.
Climate scientists often apply adjustments to surface temperature thermometers to account for “biases” in the data. The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend.


President Trump was correct to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement. He could have explained that the science was premeditated and deliberately orchestrated to demonize CO2 for a political agenda.

The plants need more atmospheric CO2 not less. Current levels of 400 parts per million (ppm) are close to the lowest levels in 600 million years.

This contradicts what the world was told by people using the claim that human production of CO2 was causing global warming.

It is impossible to identify the human cause without understanding and including natural causes. Few know that CO2 is only 4 percent of the total greenhouse gases.

the UN agency, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), established to examine human-caused global warming, were limited to only studying human causes by the definition they were given by Article 1 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC

They assume that a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase. It doesn’t, in every record the temperature increases before CO2.

The only place where a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase is in the computer models of the IPCC.

Those who do express their concern in very blunt terms. Consider German meteorologist and physicist Klaus-Eckart Puls experience.
“Ten years ago, I simply parroted what the IPCC told us. One day I started checking the facts and data – first I started with a sense of doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that much of what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any scientific facts and measurements. To this day, I still feel shame that as a scientist I made presentations of their science without first checking it.”
He discovered what I exposed publicly for years. My challenge to the government version of global warming became increasingly problematic.

They couldn’t say I wasn’t qualified. Attacks include death threats, false information about my qualifications posted on the Internet, and three lawsuits from IPCC memb

http://humansarefree.com/2017/07/dr-...ical.html#more

Dr. Tim Ball (Ph.D. in Historical Climatology) Crushes Climate Change: The Biggest Deception In History
With a 50-year academic career focusing on Historical Climatology, Dr. Tim Ball is uniquely qualified to address man-made climate change, and he demonstrates that it is a flat-out hoax.


They assume that a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase. It doesn’t, in every record the temperature increases before.
CO2Current level of CO2 are close to the lowest level in 400 million years.


The only place where a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase is in the computer models of the IPCC.The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments.
Climate scientists often apply adjustments to surface temperature thermometers to account for “biases” in the data. The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend.



there are 3 kinds of lies.Lies,damned lies and statistic:Mark Twain

http://humansarefree.com/2017/07/stu...ents.html#more

Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account for ‘Nearly All of the Warming’ in Climate Data

A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data

“Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published [global average surface temperature (GAST)] data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever – despite current claims of record setting warming,” according to a study published June 27 by two scientists and a veteran statistician.

The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments.

Basically, “cyclical pattern in the earlier reported data has very nearly been ‘adjusted’ out” of temperature readings taken from weather stations, buoys, ships and other sources.


Nearly all of the warming they are now showing are in the adjustments,” Meteorologist Joe D’Aleo, a study co-author, told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an interview. “Each dataset pushed down the 1940s warming and pushed up the current warming.”

Their study found measurements “nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history,” which was “nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern.”

“The conclusive findings of this research are that the three [global average surface temperature] data sets are not a valid representation of reality,” the study found

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXxHfb66ZgM

Nobel Laureate in Physics; "Global Warming is Pseudoscience"
Professor Ivar Giaever, the 1973 Nobel Prizewinner for Physics trashes the global warming/climate change/extreme weather pseudoscientific clap-trap and tells Obama he is "Dead Wrong".
This was the 2012 meeting of Nobel Laureates.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0

Nobel Laureate Smashes the Global Warming Hoax
rahu

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEaFzhoS67I

Former NASA Scientists... Global Warming Hoax
94 scientists ,7 former astronauts and 2 administrators at nasa sent a letter to nasa administration admonishing them for advocating global warning, there is not scientific evidence.
rahu


 
What about the thousands of volcanoes under the sea which heat up the water?

I used to blindly believe everything reported in mainstream media until I realized they had a left leaning agenda. Then I heard about the fake temperature reporting, the computer models inaccuracies, Al Gore's scaremongering that didn't pan out, coupled with scientists who studied the past and saw normal cycles occurring regularly as well as astronomers noting temp changes based on sunspot cycles.

Sure, air and water pollution are bad and no one would disagree. The US has some of the cleanest and strictest standards. No need for stealing tax money via Paris Climate Accord and destroying our jobs.

It's not science, it's politics.
 

RaRohini

Well-known member
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q50Zud-MnI0
renown meteorologist explain the ruse of global warming
start at 7:40 minute mark



the inuit have lived about the arctic circle for 1000's of years. there survival depends on intimate knowledge of their ecosphere
what the have seen is that the sun is rising higher in the sky and heating the ice. this is why it is melting , they also note that the winds to not blow from north to south. for thusands of years they could follow the snow berms created by the wind and in their way amid the unforgiving ice. now the winds blow east to west so that snow berms have changed position and the have had to adapt to the new topography.

here is the video of Inuit elders above the arctic circle revealing the real reason the arctic ice is melting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rR9xMpTb1k
the next is in the inuit elders own language and own words
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HZ_Dvkxi-8

for that matter if co2 is causing the arctic to melt, then the phenomena should be worldwide... but the Antarctic ice shelves are increasing in ice thickness.............


https://www.prisonplanet.com/study-f...mate-data.html

Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climate Data

A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.”

Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published [global average surface temperature (GAST)] data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever – despite current claims of record setting warming,” according to a study published June 27 by two scientists and a veteran statistician.
The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments.
Climate scientists often apply adjustments to surface temperature thermometers to account for “biases” in the data. The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend.


President Trump was correct to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement. He could have explained that the science was premeditated and deliberately orchestrated to demonize CO2 for a political agenda.

The plants need more atmospheric CO2 not less. Current levels of 400 parts per million (ppm) are close to the lowest levels in 600 million years.

This contradicts what the world was told by people using the claim that human production of CO2 was causing global warming.

It is impossible to identify the human cause without understanding and including natural causes. Few know that CO2 is only 4 percent of the total greenhouse gases.

the UN agency, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), established to examine human-caused global warming, were limited to only studying human causes by the definition they were given by Article 1 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC

They assume that a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase. It doesn’t, in every record the temperature increases before CO2.

The only place where a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase is in the computer models of the IPCC.

Those who do express their concern in very blunt terms. Consider German meteorologist and physicist Klaus-Eckart Puls experience.
“Ten years ago, I simply parroted what the IPCC told us. One day I started checking the facts and data – first I started with a sense of doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that much of what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any scientific facts and measurements. To this day, I still feel shame that as a scientist I made presentations of their science without first checking it.”
He discovered what I exposed publicly for years. My challenge to the government version of global warming became increasingly problematic.

They couldn’t say I wasn’t qualified. Attacks include death threats, false information about my qualifications posted on the Internet, and three lawsuits from IPCC memb

http://humansarefree.com/2017/07/dr-...ical.html#more

Dr. Tim Ball (Ph.D. in Historical Climatology) Crushes Climate Change: The Biggest Deception In History
With a 50-year academic career focusing on Historical Climatology, Dr. Tim Ball is uniquely qualified to address man-made climate change, and he demonstrates that it is a flat-out hoax.


They assume that a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase. It doesn’t, in every record the temperature increases before.
CO2Current level of CO2 are close to the lowest level in 400 million years.


The only place where a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase is in the computer models of the IPCC.The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments.
Climate scientists often apply adjustments to surface temperature thermometers to account for “biases” in the data. The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend.



there are 3 kinds of lies.Lies,damned lies and statistic:Mark Twain

http://humansarefree.com/2017/07/stu...ents.html#more

Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account for ‘Nearly All of the Warming’ in Climate Data

A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data

“Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published [global average surface temperature (GAST)] data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever – despite current claims of record setting warming,” according to a study published June 27 by two scientists and a veteran statistician.

The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments.

Basically, “cyclical pattern in the earlier reported data has very nearly been ‘adjusted’ out” of temperature readings taken from weather stations, buoys, ships and other sources.


Nearly all of the warming they are now showing are in the adjustments,” Meteorologist Joe D’Aleo, a study co-author, told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an interview. “Each dataset pushed down the 1940s warming and pushed up the current warming.”

Their study found measurements “nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history,” which was “nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern.”

“The conclusive findings of this research are that the three [global average surface temperature] data sets are not a valid representation of reality,” the study found

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXxHfb66ZgM

Nobel Laureate in Physics; "Global Warming is Pseudoscience"
Professor Ivar Giaever, the 1973 Nobel Prizewinner for Physics trashes the global warming/climate change/extreme weather pseudoscientific clap-trap and tells Obama he is "Dead Wrong".
This was the 2012 meeting of Nobel Laureates.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0

Nobel Laureate Smashes the Global Warming Hoax
rahu

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEaFzhoS67I

Former NASA Scientists... Global Warming Hoax
94 scientists ,7 former astronauts and 2 administrators at nasa sent a letter to nasa administration admonishing them for advocating global warning, there is not scientific evidence.
rahu



Hi Rahu !
I too think that 'global warming' is a hoax.We do not need another set of 'scientists' to tell us where our planet is headed. We just need to understand our own energies better and be kinder to the planet.
 

waybread

Well-known member
I've kind of debunked your Tim Ball expertise, Rahu. Reposting material on him in big capital letters doesn't make his work more credible. I've pointed out some issues with your higher sun thesis. Namely that it should be showing up in other parts of the world. Is it?

PP, it's clear that the planet has natural means of changing its energy balance. Some of these natural means might make the planet warmer. So it's like, if your house is already warm, do you turn up the furnace?

I would love for the mavens here to explain to me why it is that you rely on science for so much of your daily lives. But somehow you seem to think that climate science is a different sort of enterprise altogether, where hoodwinking the public is the order of the day. It doesn't work that way. If scientists were coming up with evidence that the climate was not getting warmer or that its warming trends were not anthropogenic, they would be snarfing up grants and contracts from the fossil fuel industry.

It's the fossil fuel industry who does not want you to know the truth. Follow the money to see why.
 

rahu

Banned
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q50Zud-MnI0
renown meteorologist explain the ruse of global warming
start at 7:40 minute mark



the inuit have lived about the arctic circle for 1000's of years. there survival depends on intimate knowledge of their ecosphere
what the have seen is that the sun is rising higher in the sky and heating the ice. this is why it is melting , they also note that the winds to not blow from north to south. for thusands of years they could follow the snow berms created by the wind and in their way amid the unforgiving ice. now the winds blow east to west so that snow berms have changed position and the have had to adapt to the new topography.

here is the video of Inuit elders above the arctic circle revealing the real reason the arctic ice is melting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rR9xMpTb1k
the next is in the inuit elders own language and own words
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HZ_Dvkxi-8

for that matter if co2 is causing the arctic to melt, then the phenomena should be worldwide... but the Antarctic ice shelves are increasing in ice thickness.............


https://www.prisonplanet.com/study-f...mate-data.html

Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climate Data

A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.”

Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published [global average surface temperature (GAST)] data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever – despite current claims of record setting warming,” according to a study published June 27 by two scientists and a veteran statistician.
The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments.
Climate scientists often apply adjustments to surface temperature thermometers to account for “biases” in the data. The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend.


President Trump was correct to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement. He could have explained that the science was premeditated and deliberately orchestrated to demonize CO2 for a political agenda.

The plants need more atmospheric CO2 not less. Current levels of 400 parts per million (ppm) are close to the lowest levels in 600 million years.

This contradicts what the world was told by people using the claim that human production of CO2 was causing global warming.

It is impossible to identify the human cause without understanding and including natural causes. Few know that CO2 is only 4 percent of the total greenhouse gases.

the UN agency, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), established to examine human-caused global warming, were limited to only studying human causes by the definition they were given by Article 1 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC

They assume that a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase. It doesn’t, in every record the temperature increases before CO2.

The only place where a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase is in the computer models of the IPCC.

Those who do express their concern in very blunt terms. Consider German meteorologist and physicist Klaus-Eckart Puls experience.
“Ten years ago, I simply parroted what the IPCC told us. One day I started checking the facts and data – first I started with a sense of doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that much of what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any scientific facts and measurements. To this day, I still feel shame that as a scientist I made presentations of their science without first checking it.”
He discovered what I exposed publicly for years. My challenge to the government version of global warming became increasingly problematic.

They couldn’t say I wasn’t qualified. Attacks include death threats, false information about my qualifications posted on the Internet, and three lawsuits from IPCC memb

http://humansarefree.com/2017/07/dr-...ical.html#more

Dr. Tim Ball (Ph.D. in Historical Climatology) Crushes Climate Change: The Biggest Deception In History
With a 50-year academic career focusing on Historical Climatology, Dr. Tim Ball is uniquely qualified to address man-made climate change, and he demonstrates that it is a flat-out hoax.


They assume that a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase. It doesn’t, in every record the temperature increases before.
CO2Current level of CO2 are close to the lowest level in 400 million years.


The only place where a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase is in the computer models of the IPCC.The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments.
Climate scientists often apply adjustments to surface temperature thermometers to account for “biases” in the data. The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend.



there are 3 kinds of lies.Lies,damned lies and statistic:Mark Twain

http://humansarefree.com/2017/07/stu...ents.html#more

Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account for ‘Nearly All of the Warming’ in Climate Data

A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data

“Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published [global average surface temperature (GAST)] data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever – despite current claims of record setting warming,” according to a study published June 27 by two scientists and a veteran statistician.

The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments.

Basically, “cyclical pattern in the earlier reported data has very nearly been ‘adjusted’ out” of temperature readings taken from weather stations, buoys, ships and other sources.


Nearly all of the warming they are now showing are in the adjustments,” Meteorologist Joe D’Aleo, a study co-author, told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an interview. “Each dataset pushed down the 1940s warming and pushed up the current warming.”

Their study found measurements “nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history,” which was “nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern.”

“The conclusive findings of this research are that the three [global average surface temperature] data sets are not a valid representation of reality,” the study found

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXxHfb66ZgM

Nobel Laureate in Physics; "Global Warming is Pseudoscience"
Professor Ivar Giaever, the 1973 Nobel Prizewinner for Physics trashes the global warming/climate change/extreme weather pseudoscientific clap-trap and tells Obama he is "Dead Wrong".
This was the 2012 meeting of Nobel Laureates.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0

Nobel Laureate Smashes the Global Warming Hoax
rahu

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEaFzhoS67I

Former NASA Scientists... Global Warming Hoax
94 scientists ,7 former astronauts and 2 administrators at nasa sent a letter to nasa administration admonishing them for advocating global warning, there is not scientific evidence.
rahu


 
From Forbes 6/26/12


Speaking of California, wouldn’t you imagine that, above all people, Al Gore would be really the most worried about underwater real estate? In his An Inconvenient Truth film, didn’t he feature an animation depicting a sudden global-warming-induced break-up of the Arctic Peninsula’s Larson-B ice shelf in 2002, suggesting that the entire Greenland Ice Sheet might suffer the same fate during this century?

But then, if this were the case, what about his recent purchase a big $9 million ocean-view villa in Montecito? Is his intent, perhaps, to keep watch on that rising tide of terror for all of us…heroically serving our nation as a modern-day Paul Revere?

:lol:
 

waybread

Well-known member
Guys, just wait and see. I don't think you understand the climate science. If you did, you could actually engage with my posts on the level of the climate science itself, not just finding some new YouTube post or other, and calling good scientists liars.

What do you think about the energy industries lying about climate change? Follow the money. They're the ones that stand to benefit from the melting of the Northwest Passage and ice in the Arctic Ocean.
 

david starling

Well-known member
Guys, just wait and see. I don't think you understand the climate science. If you did, you could actually engage with my posts on the level of the climate science itself, not just finding some new YouTube post or other, and calling good scientists liars.

What do you think about the energy industries lying about climate change? Follow the money. They're the ones that stand to benefit from the melting of the Northwest Passage and ice in the Arctic Ocean.

Given the severity of the consequences if it's NOT a hoax, it would be wise to err on the side of caution. Unless of course, you're heavily invested in the Fossil-fuel Industry, or are in favor of polluting the Planet.
 

rahu

Banned
as many scientist have pointed out , the data for global warming is from changing the data.
the co2 level is at a lowest in 400 million years.
in the entire geological record co2 increase has only occurred after the temperature rose.

global warming is a hoax.
quaddfi's weapons of mass destruction was a hoax
911 was a hoax. the war in the middle east is a hoax
the efficiently of mass vaccinations is a hoax
Obama and now trump are hoaxes

so why the big lie about global warming........hmmm
jeezzzz they are spraying the atmosphere with toxic chemical. bacteria, virus, blood dna and 1000's of other substances. funny how one big lie leads to another big lie.
for years they denied they were spraying anything, now they are admitting to spraying stuff in the atmosphere.

the prime reason they give is ......global warming ,a lie. they say they are spraying nano aluminum(along with lithium,baruim and other toxic chemicals) to reflect the sun light and lower the earths heat due to global warming . sounds good ... bu the fact is a clear atmosphere allows the heat to dissipate into space. covering the shy with toxic clouds only traps the heat.
why do you think clear nights are colder than cloudy nights.

in northern California the water and ground are contaminated with aluminum. whereas 5 years ago there was not aluminum in the soil samples or water.......geeezzeee aluminum is associated with Alzheimer's disease..........geeeze ......alzheimers disease has increased 1500 % in rural areas and autism in children is up 1000% . this was first reported by anti chemtrail advoctes years ago, now the government has said the same thing.

so the real question isn't why they are lying about global warming but why are the poisoning the planet with toxic chemical's sprayed from the sky.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q50Zud-MnI0
renown meteorologist explain the ruse of global warming
start at 7:40 minute mark

here is the video of Inuit elders above the arctic circle revealing the real reason the arctic ice is melting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rR9xMpTb1k
the next is in the inuit elders own language and own words
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HZ_Dvkxi-8

ttps://www.prisonplanet.com/study-f...mate-data.html

Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climate Data

A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.”


http://humansarefree.com/2017/07/dr-...ical.html#more

Dr. Tim Ball (Ph.D. in Historical Climatology) Crushes Climate Change: The Biggest Deception In History
With a 50-year academic career focusing on Historical Climatology, Dr. Tim Ball is uniquely qualified to address man-made climate change, and he demonstrates that it is a flat-out hoax


Basically, “cyclical pattern in the earlier reported data has very nearly been ‘adjusted’ out” of temperature readings taken from weather stations, buoys, ships and other sources.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXxHfb66ZgM

Nobel Laureate in Physics; "Global Warming is Pseudoscience"
Professor Ivar Giaever, the 1973 Nobel Prizewinner for Physics trashes the global warming/climate change/extreme weather pseudoscientific clap-trap and tells Obama he is "Dead Wrong".
This was the 2012 meeting of Nobel Laureates.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0

Nobel Laureate Smashes the Global Warming Hoax


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEaFzhoS67I

Former NASA Scientists... Global Warming Hoax
94 scientists ,7 former astronauts and 2 administrators at nasa sent a letter to nasa administration admonishing them for advocating global warning, there is not scientific evidence

rahu
 
Last edited:

waybread

Well-known member
Given the severity of the consequences if it's NOT a hoax, it would be wise to err on the side of caution. Unless of course, you're heavily invested in the Fossil-fuel Industry, or are in favor of polluting the Planet.

David, I agree totally. I don't know if anyone here is familiar with a philosophical problem called Pascal's Wager, but basically if you're faced with a dilemma and you don't know the outcome, it's best to err on the side of caution. https://www.princeton.edu/~grosen/puc/phi203/Pascal.html

We have to wonder why climate change deniers turn a blind eye to the fossil fuel industry's resistance to whatever might curtail their profits. They'd be delighted if Arctic sea ice melts.

rahu, you can find a Youtube video to support any theory you want, not matter how mistaken.
 
Top