Modcleopatra
Banned
Re: would any one be agaiunst having a pratise board for beginners??
I can barely stand to read this, no offense at all to Lillygyc. I understand upkeep, organization, and routine maintenance are not easy. I understand this is a piece of hard-earned effort. Lillygyc I am not criticizing you personally. Looking at this however, I don't see how this reflects anything of what I mean.
I see no clear kind of formatting. I see no clear kind of structure, rhythm, or desired objective to understand. I see a bunch of information, scattered and done in different styles, different fonts, different colors, that don't express anything meaningful to me as the reader.And I do see some cookbooking, which I thought we didn't want here?
Worst of all, I see the hard-earned efforts of Dr. Farr, Lillygyc, and Tikana, given no justice because it just looks terrible. Lilly I hope your ears aren't ringing on that one. I am just discussing what I see as I see it.
Where is the simplicity? The function? The order? The clearly stated objectives of this Basic Astrology Article? Now I can appreciate people wanting to include their own creativity and style, but I think it really gets in the way here.
Eternalautumn, you read this and imagine you are beginner, new to this site, new to astrology, maybe feeling intimidated.
Does this source as it is help you?
We already have this, mod. See this article:http://astrologyweekly.com/forum/showthread.php?t=18461; it explains everything a beginner needs to know, including much of what you have mentioned needs to be written. We already have it, so the problem is not creation, it is discovery. So, we need to find a way to let everyone know that if you want to learn astrology from the basics, you should use the Ed Board (and the aforementioned article in particular) and the Beginner's Board.
I can barely stand to read this, no offense at all to Lillygyc. I understand upkeep, organization, and routine maintenance are not easy. I understand this is a piece of hard-earned effort. Lillygyc I am not criticizing you personally. Looking at this however, I don't see how this reflects anything of what I mean.
I see no clear kind of formatting. I see no clear kind of structure, rhythm, or desired objective to understand. I see a bunch of information, scattered and done in different styles, different fonts, different colors, that don't express anything meaningful to me as the reader.And I do see some cookbooking, which I thought we didn't want here?
Worst of all, I see the hard-earned efforts of Dr. Farr, Lillygyc, and Tikana, given no justice because it just looks terrible. Lilly I hope your ears aren't ringing on that one. I am just discussing what I see as I see it.
Where is the simplicity? The function? The order? The clearly stated objectives of this Basic Astrology Article? Now I can appreciate people wanting to include their own creativity and style, but I think it really gets in the way here.
Eternalautumn, you read this and imagine you are beginner, new to this site, new to astrology, maybe feeling intimidated.
Does this source as it is help you?