wilsontc
Staff member
All,
As astrologers, you know that people are individuals, each chart an individual mapping of the attitudes and behaviors of that individual. This individual mapping exists for the person's entire life, underlying everything they do in their life.
This is why looking at people as groups makes no astrological sense: external indicators have nothing to do with the individual mapping of the attitudes and behaviors of that individual. White people have vastly different individual mappings of their attitudes and behaviors between each other, gay people have vastly different individual mappings of their attitudes and behaviors between each other, rich people have vastly different individual mappings of their attitudes and behaviors between each other, and so on. Saying "That person is a white/gay/rich person so I therefore know their attitudes and behaviors" makes NO astrological sense.
Of all the people in the world, astrologers should know that people are individuals and, if they are allowed their individual rights, can achieve the full potential of their chart. That's why, for example, people who are rich or athletic are not one color, sexual orientation, or gender. The more we can see people as individuals the more we can get rid of seeing them as belonging to one group or another. And the less we think of people as groups, the clearer we can see them for who they really are.
About the Truth of the Individual,
Tim
As astrologers, you know that people are individuals, each chart an individual mapping of the attitudes and behaviors of that individual. This individual mapping exists for the person's entire life, underlying everything they do in their life.
This is why looking at people as groups makes no astrological sense: external indicators have nothing to do with the individual mapping of the attitudes and behaviors of that individual. White people have vastly different individual mappings of their attitudes and behaviors between each other, gay people have vastly different individual mappings of their attitudes and behaviors between each other, rich people have vastly different individual mappings of their attitudes and behaviors between each other, and so on. Saying "That person is a white/gay/rich person so I therefore know their attitudes and behaviors" makes NO astrological sense.
Of all the people in the world, astrologers should know that people are individuals and, if they are allowed their individual rights, can achieve the full potential of their chart. That's why, for example, people who are rich or athletic are not one color, sexual orientation, or gender. The more we can see people as individuals the more we can get rid of seeing them as belonging to one group or another. And the less we think of people as groups, the clearer we can see them for who they really are.
About the Truth of the Individual,
Tim