Re: Astrology for pay, when to start
Online learning is an even bigger problem for me because it doesn't include any in-person interactions. If I'm learning anything from anyone, it works best when we meet in person. Online interactions in a forum are somewhat different... that's more personal and less attached to expectations... but not being able to interact with a teacher in person, when it is a predetermined student/teacher relationship, is detrimental to my learning in a way I can't quite explain. And then there's the exams. I can take them, and do well on them, but not if they're timed. NCGR doesn't give any indication of accommodating disabilities, which I would need... in school, I qualified for extended testing time because of my ADD/nonspecific learning disability.
If my sense is correct, that their program is built on the assumption that everyone learns best from lectures and competence is best assessed through written (and timed) tests, it's definitely not for me.
I can see myself doing an apprenticeship program in astrology, if I find one that's a good fit. But not right now. I'm focusing on herbalism for this year at least. The rest of my time is taken up with working at a more regular job and other commitments.
My current plan is exactly what you suggest: charge less than full fledged professional astrologers, and what you didn't suggest: include a non-monetary compensation option for people who can't comfortably afford my rate. I'm not building a whole practice right now, just a side line at most.
I'd be happy to interpret it!Osamenor, I've seen your interpretations in various threads and they are quite good. If you need feedback from test subjects with an astrological background I'd be happy to offer my chart for interpretation.
I checked NCGR's website at this suggestion, and my first reaction was, good information, but the way they're teaching it will probably just frustrate me and waste my time. I have a very hands-on learning style, not at all compatible with the traditional lecture route.That said, many professional astrologers I know have certifications of some sort. NCGR certification is popular, and the classes go over everything you might need, including modern natal, also transits, progressions, and traditional. It isn't cheap but you might feel more prepared if you complete their curriculum. In any case, if you charged much less than some of the astrologers who are now charging hundreds, that could help in gaining more clients.
Online learning is an even bigger problem for me because it doesn't include any in-person interactions. If I'm learning anything from anyone, it works best when we meet in person. Online interactions in a forum are somewhat different... that's more personal and less attached to expectations... but not being able to interact with a teacher in person, when it is a predetermined student/teacher relationship, is detrimental to my learning in a way I can't quite explain. And then there's the exams. I can take them, and do well on them, but not if they're timed. NCGR doesn't give any indication of accommodating disabilities, which I would need... in school, I qualified for extended testing time because of my ADD/nonspecific learning disability.
If my sense is correct, that their program is built on the assumption that everyone learns best from lectures and competence is best assessed through written (and timed) tests, it's definitely not for me.
I can see myself doing an apprenticeship program in astrology, if I find one that's a good fit. But not right now. I'm focusing on herbalism for this year at least. The rest of my time is taken up with working at a more regular job and other commitments.
My current plan is exactly what you suggest: charge less than full fledged professional astrologers, and what you didn't suggest: include a non-monetary compensation option for people who can't comfortably afford my rate. I'm not building a whole practice right now, just a side line at most.