david starling
Well-known member
We rely on modern-day astronomers for the ephemerides. Those who use the outermosts and asteroids rely on astronomers for the names of those celestial bodies, and many of us attach astrological significance to those namings.
But, are the names the astronomers give them always correct? Should we simply accept them as they are?
We've already had a slight disagreement with astronomers over the downgrading of Pluto from planet to dwarf planet, but it hasn't really changed anything, because that hasn't changed our evaluation of Pluto's influence in a chart.
But the naming by astronomers appears to be sacrosanct. We take it on faith that the planets are properly named.
No memes please.
But, are the names the astronomers give them always correct? Should we simply accept them as they are?
We've already had a slight disagreement with astronomers over the downgrading of Pluto from planet to dwarf planet, but it hasn't really changed anything, because that hasn't changed our evaluation of Pluto's influence in a chart.
But the naming by astronomers appears to be sacrosanct. We take it on faith that the planets are properly named.
No memes please.