The Aquarius Age as fixed will see a resolution of the fluid socio-political systems in Pisces and over centuries, unification as a world system.
For me, I wonder if the planets are relevant to the quality of a given age? Or rather are the stars of the ruling constellation of the age those causes which give the quality and tone to how the age plays out? I do not know the answer to that question, but lean somewhat to the stars giving the quality of influence, rather than the planets.
For me, I wonder if the planets are relevant to the quality of a given age? Or rather are the stars of the ruling constellation of the age those causes which give the quality and tone to how the age plays out? I do not know the answer to that question, but lean somewhat to the stars giving the quality of influence, rather than the planets.
Thinking of the ages, let’s say 500,000,000 years divided by 25,000.
It says the planets will realign again. But, it is not quite like that is it? For the planets may be there, but everything is not exactly the same every 25,000.
If we use 360 degrees and rotate around, throughout ages, it would arrive back at the same degree eventually, and have a similar thing as we have now. But Pisces Age next, will not be exactly the same, but after rotating Through the 360, maybe. 🙂😁😁
david starling;1166847 But said:Indeed so! I am not satisfied with any of the dozen or so ayanamsa which have been proposed over the past 150 years, and certainly not with the 2 leading ayanamsas currently predominant in Vedic astrology; your idea of discrete 30 deg tropical signs constituting the precessional ages is interesting and seems to solve the problem, but for me-I still cannot say that I have any answer to this issue of precessional ages…
Indeed so! I am not satisfied with any of the dozen or so ayanamsa which have been proposed over the past 150 years, and certainly not with the 2 leading ayanamsas currently predominant in Vedic astrology; your idea of discrete 30 deg tropical signs constituting the precessional ages is interesting and seems to solve the problem, but for me-I still cannot say that I have any answer to this issue of precessional ages…
Thinking of the ages, let’s say 500,000,000 years divided by 25,000.
It says the planets will realign again. But, it is not quite like that is it? For the planets may be there, but everything is not exactly the same every 25,000.
If we use 360 degrees and rotate around, throughout ages, it would arrive back at the same degree eventually, and have a similar thing as we have now. But Pisces Age next, will not be exactly the same, but after rotating Through the 360, maybe. 🙂😁😁
Indeed so! I am not satisfied with any of the dozen or so ayanamsa which have been proposed over the past 150 years, and certainly not with the 2 leading ayanamsas currently predominant in Vedic astrology; your idea of discrete 30 deg tropical signs constituting the precessional ages is interesting and seems to solve the problem, but for me-I still cannot say that I have any answer to this issue of precessional ages…
pyramids of ancient Egypt suggest the Fixed-Earth sign Taurus.
From the intuitive position the triangle represents Aries. Mechanical penetration is achieved with a triangle at the head, Taurus would be the shaft.
For me, I wonder if the planets are relevant to the quality of a given age? Or rather are the stars of the ruling constellation of the age those causes which give the quality and tone to how the age plays out? I do not know the answer to that question, but lean somewhat to the stars giving the quality of influence, rather than the planets.
I think the emanation of the Signs is directed through our own Sun somehow, relative to the central Sun, r.e. the Yugas of Vedic lore. The planets are possibly the conductors of that energy, the Sun being the receiver.
Years ago I posted a quotation from Origen (dated 240 AD!) in which this early church father mentioned a progression of ages connected with “the visible signs and the invisible signs”, meaning by visible signs the zodiacal constellations and by invisible signs what we now call the tropical signs (of common western astrology); interestingly Origen went on to say that the invisible signs were likely the ones that were operative inn the changing of ages; Origen is the very earliest source I have found specifically mentioning a changing of astrological ages, his writing on this @240AD being just 50 years afterPtolemy, and coming from the same city as Ptolemy (Alexandria, Egypt). My post of Origen’s full quote was on skyscript back in 2010.
I think the emanation of the Signs is directed through our own Sun somehow, relative to the central Sun, r.e. the Yugas of Vedic lore. The planets are possibly the conductors of that energy, the Sun being the receiver.
Why not the planets that rule the Age-signs? And, we receive that energy in our charts?
A chart itself is located on the Sun's path around the Earth.
Btw, is it possible that Moon Aquarians have difficulty expressing themselves through speaking and writing? I have the problem you mentioned.