"The trouble with astrology is that, to date, it has performed really poorly in the kinds of statistical tests routinely applied to other theories about human behaviour."
.. and 80% of it is due to not requiring any one on one connection with client to assess them
(testing, observing, connecting, decoding) to their charts is why it preforms poorly amongst as one stated lack of an education degree. It's where the bridge of gap is needed mostly and why I support it.
There that saying one who cannot become a Pyschologist becomes an Astrologist
but.. this also can be said for Pyschologist who trys to become an Astrologists. Different sides of the same coin.
Astrologers are symbolists (on paper) almost in the same way clairvoyants, who's style of method is more of a read it out loud as they see it symbolists.
If pyschology is not teaching "conciousness" it not teaching anything and same can be argued for astrology.
I don't understand why pyschologist feel so threatened.
We are allowed to choose from whom we want to be our guiders in higher conciousness. I wouldn't take the cruel method of abuse that comes from pyschologist if my life depended on it.
