Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Astrology
Other Astrology
Medical Astrology
A Medical Astrology Primer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jeremy" data-source="post: 68499" data-attributes="member: 6560"><p>Hi Folks,</p><p>With regard to the degrees I am uncertain, I absolutely have no further insight that could be considered definitive. My understanding of other ancient lists of critical degrees is that they are usually denoted from 1 - 30; thus Aries 1 would correspond to the first degree of Aries. Logically, if a sign has 30 listed it must refer to the 30th degree and working in reverse, the 1st degree must therefore represent zero degrees. It is interesting that Ebertin listed 31 degrees for Taurus though, in my view that would certainly explain how my list has only 3 consecutive degrees for neck nerves and his has 4; he certainly has one too many degrees in Taurus, and both lists must have come from a common source. Often the degree is accurate on the list I use in describing symptoms or problem areas; often it is <em>somewhat</em> accurate, so I would not personally point to a degree and claim definitively that it is the key to a health issue; this also because there are many possible sensitive points which come into play. The Pluto point I have found to be nearly always relevant within an orb of 2-3 degrees, so I wouldn't worry too much about which of 17 or 18 degrees is denoted. Of course I am not giving a directive by saying that, only relating my experience which is far from infallible!</p><p> </p><p>Frisiangal, I was intrigued to see that the semi-square you referred to as a health warning because in cases I have studied I have to say that rings true, possibly more than any other single aspect. Do you have any other insights regarding the nature of aspects or is it just the semi-square that works that way?</p><p> </p><p>As for Uranus, I tried to make this point in note 5; quite badly I expect. I do believe that all the planets are indicative of a range of presdisposing factors that are the psychic instigators of disease; just that for the purpose of identifying physical symptoms, Pluto is the most common and urgent point of expression in the physical body. Where it 'erupts', so to speak, from the psychic underworld onto the surface (or into matter). I also find that unless Uranus or Neptune is strong, ruler, Gauquelin or aspected to Pluto then it does not often have much physical influence in the matrix that delineates disease or physical problems. That is hardly scientific though, rather a synthesis of experience and I am fully aware that such a conclusion is informed both by skill and experience, so I may be back here in a couple of years ranting about Uranus and Neptune! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p> </p><p>Certainly, the Uranian tendency to excitable, erratic and charged psychic states would predispose to disease if afflicted, or rather, if afflicting or causing a blockage.</p><p> </p><p>I am intrigued by your insights and wonder if you might lay them out for inspection, it would be good to expand the boundaries of the topic if at all possible.</p><p> </p><p>Peace,</p><p>Jeremy</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jeremy, post: 68499, member: 6560"] Hi Folks, With regard to the degrees I am uncertain, I absolutely have no further insight that could be considered definitive. My understanding of other ancient lists of critical degrees is that they are usually denoted from 1 - 30; thus Aries 1 would correspond to the first degree of Aries. Logically, if a sign has 30 listed it must refer to the 30th degree and working in reverse, the 1st degree must therefore represent zero degrees. It is interesting that Ebertin listed 31 degrees for Taurus though, in my view that would certainly explain how my list has only 3 consecutive degrees for neck nerves and his has 4; he certainly has one too many degrees in Taurus, and both lists must have come from a common source. Often the degree is accurate on the list I use in describing symptoms or problem areas; often it is [I]somewhat[/I] accurate, so I would not personally point to a degree and claim definitively that it is the key to a health issue; this also because there are many possible sensitive points which come into play. The Pluto point I have found to be nearly always relevant within an orb of 2-3 degrees, so I wouldn't worry too much about which of 17 or 18 degrees is denoted. Of course I am not giving a directive by saying that, only relating my experience which is far from infallible! Frisiangal, I was intrigued to see that the semi-square you referred to as a health warning because in cases I have studied I have to say that rings true, possibly more than any other single aspect. Do you have any other insights regarding the nature of aspects or is it just the semi-square that works that way? As for Uranus, I tried to make this point in note 5; quite badly I expect. I do believe that all the planets are indicative of a range of presdisposing factors that are the psychic instigators of disease; just that for the purpose of identifying physical symptoms, Pluto is the most common and urgent point of expression in the physical body. Where it 'erupts', so to speak, from the psychic underworld onto the surface (or into matter). I also find that unless Uranus or Neptune is strong, ruler, Gauquelin or aspected to Pluto then it does not often have much physical influence in the matrix that delineates disease or physical problems. That is hardly scientific though, rather a synthesis of experience and I am fully aware that such a conclusion is informed both by skill and experience, so I may be back here in a couple of years ranting about Uranus and Neptune! :) Certainly, the Uranian tendency to excitable, erratic and charged psychic states would predispose to disease if afflicted, or rather, if afflicting or causing a blockage. I am intrigued by your insights and wonder if you might lay them out for inspection, it would be good to expand the boundaries of the topic if at all possible. Peace, Jeremy [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Astrology
Other Astrology
Medical Astrology
A Medical Astrology Primer
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top