Yea I wonder that too a lot because sometimes your planets go to the next house. I heard whole signs is more reliable because everything starts at 0, and a lot of professional astrologers use it. My chart doesn't change in whole signs except Pluto. I like using whole signs in Persona charts...
I just found their chart really interesting with everything in the midheaven and a lot of capricorn. I made a thread about it to see if anybody had any opinions about it.
Here's a chart with placidus and whole signs, and I wnted to know anything about it like career, future, romance, etc. Just a general observation because there's a whole lot of capricorn. (It's not my chart)
I'm very well aware about what Vesta means. I'm just asking? I don't see the problem. I don't see new posts on the forum, so why not? It's not your problem. I know what venus and the 2nd house represent, I'm not new to astrology. I'm looking for other peoples thoughts, if you don't have one...
My pholus conjuncts my juno and lilith in sag 9th house, but pholus is in 8th house. Eris is in the first house but not conjunct asc in aries. What does this mean? I just use the basic asteroids like ceres, pallas, vesta, chiron, etc. The other ones no bc there's to many of them. I think chiron...
So, you think asteroids and angles can be in an aspect pattern but not in a stellium? Should I ignore the aqua "Stellium" I mentioned earlier? I know I still have the aqua energy in me though. The asteroids I count are just chiron, north node, true node, pallas, all types of liliths, ceres...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.