Ninneveh
Well-known member
Hi everyone, so far I've found two differing ways to attain the Oikodespotes of the chart.
Via Maternus, the Oikodespotes is found in the following sign after the sign in which the Moon is placed at birth. Ex. If moon in Scorpio, then Oikodespotes is Jupiter, the ruler of Sagittarius. He also says that the Oikodespotes can never be the sun or the moon.
The other method, which I think derives from Schmidt, says that the Oikodespotes is the lord of the sign in which the Epikrateor is found.
Which of the two methods is most correct, or have I fudged something up with my recollection?
Via Maternus, the Oikodespotes is found in the following sign after the sign in which the Moon is placed at birth. Ex. If moon in Scorpio, then Oikodespotes is Jupiter, the ruler of Sagittarius. He also says that the Oikodespotes can never be the sun or the moon.
The other method, which I think derives from Schmidt, says that the Oikodespotes is the lord of the sign in which the Epikrateor is found.
Which of the two methods is most correct, or have I fudged something up with my recollection?