Best Wormhole Vid. Yet

piercethevale

Well-known member
There are so many composites and fakes on youtube and there is no 'Truth in Labeling" law at youtube.

There are so many composites and fakes and what not of these that to cull through them to find a new one that is also real [or a dang good fake]. Like the narrator says, If this is real...it's about the most 'WOW" I've ever come across.
The one of the 'spiral wormhole' in the sky over Norway one of the best that I know of. And three identical phenomenae over Russia, China and Australia which has some excellent 'Doppler Radar' print outs of 3 at the same time there. nothing new..till tonight.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCb4TDq7Kxg&feature=related
Actually it's been on youtube since May 2010. There was a sextile Yod in the sky as Jupiter transited from 24th to 30th Pisces and Uranus 29th Pisces to 1st Aries, Saturn 29th to 28th Virgo and Neptune in the 29th of Aquarius all month. The matrix was awaiting an astral qualifier for the 28th-30th Aries which was fulfilled by the moon on the 12th of May apprx 2am Greenwich. The release date of this vid is May 23rd. Jupiter was at 27* 53' Pisces and Saturn 27* 53' Virgo that day.
 

Mark

Well-known member
Here I am to serve as "that guy" again. After viewing it twice and thinking upon it, I must conclude that this video is based either on disinformation or an hoax. Examine the first clip of the "phenomenon." Notice how mathematically perfect the spirals are. I am extremely confident that those spirals are a fractal rendering (computer generated). The geometric perfection of shapes suggests an hoax. Further, linear progression is demonstrated by both clips shown. Notice that the expanding, horizontal circle toward the end of both clips progresses left and right in a way that is perfectly oriented to the video frame, as if following an axis. It's just too squared up and geometrically flawless to be real. Any video of a real occurrence in the sky should be seen at some angle and produce "dirty" (slightly distorted) light effects.

As an after-thought, perhaps YouTube might be used to study the astrology of hoaxes?
 

piercethevale

Well-known member
Here I am to serve as "that guy" again. After viewing it twice and thinking upon it, I must conclude that this video is based either on disinformation or an hoax. Examine the first clip of the "phenomenon." Notice how mathematically perfect the spirals are. I am extremely confident that those spirals are a fractal rendering (computer generated). The geometric perfection of shapes suggests an hoax. Further, linear progression is demonstrated by both clips shown. Notice that the expanding, horizontal circle toward the end of both clips progresses left and right in a way that is perfectly oriented to the video frame, as if following an axis. It's just too squared up and geometrically flawless to be real. Any video of a real occurrence in the sky should be seen at some angle and produce "dirty" (slightly distorted) light effects.

As an after-thought, perhaps YouTube might be used to study the astrology of hoaxes?

I know what you're saying. Everyone here that has seen it these last couple of days , first thing out of their mouths is 'Photoshopped'..but these same dudes here didn't believe any of my stuff either until they were finally stumped by similar such events in this area, Take my two photos of what I call 'Sprites' for Exhibit A...too center frame...too coincidental...shutter speed set to just the right setting [and I had just been given the camera without instructions as it was one of the very first digital cameras and the battery compartment door latch had broken off and to keep the door shut and resist the pressure of the tension that is part of the design to ensure 'contact' to the poles on the batteries on 'that' side the whole thing could only be made operable by looping bailing wire around the camera and ten twisting the ends together repeatedly as to apply increasing torque to get the battery compartment door to shut. I have repeatedly said that as the idea of a card instead of film was so new to me that I realized that it allowed me to just shoot, and shoot and shoot...without worries as to the cost. I had only gotten as far as understanding what it could do...but as I had only gotten as far in understanding that the dial on the top of the camera had 4 settings and figured everything else was done automatically. I didn't discover for some time to come that I could change aperture, F-Stop, simulated film speed and much later that there was also a shutter speed control feature...it's just that it was set at 1/30th of a second. My mom gave me a Kodak Easy Share 14.5 megapixel camera for my birthday in 2010 and I only last month discovered it has even more features than the Olympus 2.1 I used capturing the Sprites. As the Kodak camera looks like one of those expensive non-35 mm cameras that were being promoted back in the 1980s that were so obviously just the same old Kodak Brownie type camera that was for grandma or sis to take to birthday parties or Girl Scout pic nics, I didn't take it so serious until I needed to scan a document and out of desperation [due to my trading the scanner for some new computer speakers to replace the ones taken in a burglary] I used it to take some shots of the text in a book and found that the picture quality was so superior to the scanner I had just trader away I decided to use it for that purpose from now on and would save $ by not having to by another scanner...and finally read the booklet that came with it and...WOW...it does more that the Argus 35 mm i owned in the 80s that cost beaucoup bucks then.
What about all the discrepancies of the WTC, the Pentagon damage and the other plane that went down in Penns. that are obvious and had been all along [prime example building 7 at the WTC that, even only, 1 out of 10 N.Y.C. residents had heard about even 10 years later...as of last Sept. ...myself included as to last Sept. It was only these last coupleof months that I was informed of and have verified that Rumsfeld was before Congress the afternoon of Sept. 10, 2001 and was on the hot seat for not being able to account for some 3 Trillion dollars He said was unaccountable as to where it might have disappeared to...giving an explanation that it was not to any contractual obligations or loan to another Gov't Dept or another ally Nation[as there would then have to be a record of it and a contractual type agreement or acknowledgement...and even if it were a under the table kind of covert support...3 Trillion is unprecedented...and makes no sense.] So, what happened? Another hi-jacked jet airliner just happens to go for the Pentagon the next day..but only no credible witnesses saw it..no film record..in fact no debris from a jet airliner,the building showed only a missile shaped object could possibly be considered to have been the culprit..yet, that suggestion is vehemently denied by the admin.
...and it hit the accounting dept. on the day 'outside' [no military, non Gov't] accountants are there to examine the books. [and my first cousin, A.C., son of my moms' sister and her 2nd husband that was L.A. Metro police 1947 to 1967, CIA liaison to the Saigon Police Dept. 1968 to 1974, Top Field Agent for the DEA in Ecuador and Peru, 1975 to 1991,... he was an accountant a C.P.A. with both a degree in Bus. Econ and Computer Science that worked for a 'Firm in Langley, VA. from 1984 until recently...so, please don't retort that the Pentagon doesn't have its' own accountants...Rumsfeld set those poor unsuspecting souls up...if He or the Admin did have anything to do with 9/11 as many Americans have only recently had given indication that they now believe ...a number of which is still too small as to catch the notice from the vast majority of Americans that refuse to even listen let alone consider that these allegations might at least be somewhat, if not wholly, true.
The timing of the release date on the vid. and the spiral clouds in Norway, Mexico, Australia, Moscow, etc. that all occurred that month in 2010 has given me good reason to consider this Western Canada phenomena is just as valid.

Then again, who am I to say anything about the subject?
So, am I saying this is legit? ...well no, I'm not...I'm just ,SAYING.
 
Last edited:

Mark

Well-known member
Perhaps there are some videos of spirals that are legit. This one isn't, though. I thought to myself when contemplating the video that things like this do happen. They just don't look like a fractal rendering. Whether it was intended as disinformation or an hoax, the effect is the same. It knocks all but the best researchers off the trail of the real phenomena that deserve to be studied. There are still all kinds of things happening in the sky above us that we don't understand nor publicly discuss.

As to September 11th, I have detailed my view once on these forums (though without the expectation that I would be taken seriously). Here's what I know. There were two planes which impacted the two towers in New York. There is video evidence of a bomb at the Pentagon (explosion without a plane) and a complete lack of people who saw a plane. Out of all the people present, all the rescue workers, and all the reporters, nobody actually saw a plane hit the building, nor did they see any plane wreckage (e.g. airliner seats, engine components, pieces of aircraft aluminum, etc.). There was one guy who was driving by on the highway who said he saw a plane, but where he was and the direction he was facing at the time makes it impossible for him to have seen the Pentagon at the same time as the plane he said he saw.

Further, on the day of September 11th, there was a report of two F-16's (which I immediately drilled into my mind and swore to never forget) that were "tailing" (not "being scrambled," but "tailing") the plane in Pennsylvania. I've only heard those F-16's mentioned once in the last ten years and no one took note of it. At the time, I just so happened to share an archaeology class with the niece of a congressman. Our professor was late that day, so we all had time to sit around outside the classroom and talk. I mentioned my belief that the plane in Pennsylvania was shot down and she immediately spoke up and agreed.

The one other thing that I know is that Al Qaeda does not hate America. They hate capitalist imperialism and that is the reason they targeted the World Trade Center in New York. My belief is that the attack was known and forces within our own government planted the bomb at the Pentagon to change the message and convince everyone that all the terrorists want is to destroy America. What they really want is for capitalist imperialists to stop using their homes as chess boards and themselves as cannon fodder in the interest of money and power. I can't blame them for being pissed off. I believe the attack was an act of desperation, trying to get the attention of the American people. That's why the money-changers had to change the message.
 

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
http://www.archive.org/details/911 links to an online unedited archive of news as broadcast on 11 September 2001 that you may find interesting as well as useful piercethevale :smile:

QUOTE
The events of September 11th, 2001 affected the entire world.
The 9/11 Television News Archive is a library of news coverage of the events of 9/11/2001 and their aftermath as presented by U.S. and international broadcasters. A resource for scholars, journalists, and the public, it presents one week of news broadcasts for study, research and analysis.

Television is our pre-eminent medium of information, entertainment and persuasion, but until now it has not been a medium of record. This Archive attempts to address this gap by making TV news coverage of this critical week in September 2001 available to those studying these events and their treatment in the media.
http://www.archive.org/details/911/day/20010911
Explore 3,000 hours of international TV News from 20 channels over 7 days, and select analysis by scholars.
LEARNING FROM RECORDED MEMORY: 9/11 TV News Archive Conference

Held on August 24, 2011 at New York University's Department of Cinema Studies, this conference highlighted work by scholars using television news materials to help us understand how TV news presented the events of 9/11/2001 and the international response.
 

piercethevale

Well-known member
Well, I have to concede, I have asked a number of friends here to check the vid out...everyone of them say it's fake...

...so, it must be...

...but, in my defense, I'd like to say that I don't have the experience with Video games and movies that have a lot of CGI in it...
 

piercethevale

Well-known member
The one other thing that I know is that Al Qaeda does not hate America. They hate capitalist imperialism and that is the reason they targeted the World Trade Center in New York. My belief is that the attack was known and forces within our own government planted the bomb at the Pentagon to change the message and convince everyone that all the terrorists want is to destroy America. What they really want is for capitalist imperialists to stop using their homes as chess boards and themselves as cannon fodder in the interest of money and power. I can't blame them for being pissed off. I believe the attack was an act of desperation, trying to get the attention of the American people. That's why the money-changers had to change the message.
I totally agree with what I high lighted. I've said the same thing for the last 10 years. It was an act of desperation to catch the attention of Joe American. I've said it before....it was due to our corporate controlled information that
We give no respect to their customs and their right not to be subjected to the insults and assaults we make upon their mores with advertising Revlon and Wonder bras for the women, pornography and liquor for the men [and some women too]
As I am a descendant of Quaker settlers in Penns. 1686, I know this story and quite well. In the late 17th century two Quakers traveled to Boston on a business trip. They went there with the intent of getting a business arrangement for some long term mutual interest. They were hanged just moments after arriving as to being considered so aberrant from 'Puritan' dress and conduct. It's true two Quakers were considered to be an ideological invasion and a mortal insult.
 
Top