Here I am to serve as "that guy" again. After viewing it twice and thinking upon it, I must conclude that this video is based either on disinformation or an hoax. Examine the first clip of the "phenomenon." Notice how mathematically perfect the spirals are. I am extremely confident that those spirals are a fractal rendering (computer generated). The geometric perfection of shapes suggests an hoax. Further, linear progression is demonstrated by both clips shown. Notice that the expanding, horizontal circle toward the end of both clips progresses left and right in a way that is perfectly oriented to the video frame, as if following an axis. It's just too squared up and geometrically flawless to be real. Any video of a real occurrence in the sky should be seen at some angle and produce "dirty" (slightly distorted) light effects.
As an after-thought, perhaps YouTube might be used to study the astrology of hoaxes?
I know what you're saying. Everyone here that has seen it these last couple of days , first thing out of their mouths is 'Photoshopped'..but these same dudes here didn't believe any of my stuff either until they were finally stumped by similar such events in this area, Take my two photos of what I call 'Sprites' for Exhibit A...too center frame...too coincidental...shutter speed set to just the right setting [and I had just been given the camera without instructions as it was one of the very first digital cameras and the battery compartment door latch had broken off and to keep the door shut and resist the pressure of the tension that is part of the design to ensure 'contact' to the poles on the batteries on 'that' side the whole thing could only be made operable by looping bailing wire around the camera and ten twisting the ends together repeatedly as to apply increasing torque to get the battery compartment door to shut. I have repeatedly said that as the idea of a card instead of film was so new to me that I realized that it allowed me to just shoot, and shoot and shoot...without worries as to the cost. I had only gotten as far as understanding what it could do...but as I had only gotten as far in understanding that the dial on the top of the camera had 4 settings and figured everything else was done automatically. I didn't discover for some time to come that I could change aperture, F-Stop, simulated film speed and much later that there was also a shutter speed control feature...it's just that it was set at 1/30th of a second. My mom gave me a Kodak Easy Share 14.5 megapixel camera for my birthday in 2010 and I only last month discovered it has even more features than the Olympus 2.1 I used capturing the Sprites. As the Kodak camera looks like one of those expensive non-35 mm cameras that were being promoted back in the 1980s that were so obviously just the same old Kodak Brownie type camera that was for grandma or sis to take to birthday parties or Girl Scout pic nics, I didn't take it so serious until I needed to scan a document and out of desperation [due to my trading the scanner for some new computer speakers to replace the ones taken in a burglary] I used it to take some shots of the text in a book and found that the picture quality was so superior to the scanner I had just trader away I decided to use it for that purpose from now on and would save $ by not having to by another scanner...and finally read the booklet that came with it and...WOW...it does more that the Argus 35 mm i owned in the 80s that cost beaucoup bucks then.
What about all the discrepancies of the WTC, the Pentagon damage and the other plane that went down in Penns. that are obvious and had been all along [prime example building 7 at the WTC that, even only, 1 out of 10 N.Y.C. residents had heard about even 10 years later...as of last Sept. ...myself included as to last Sept. It was only these last coupleof months that I was informed of and have verified that Rumsfeld was before Congress the afternoon of Sept. 10, 2001 and was on the hot seat for not being able to account for some 3 Trillion dollars He said was unaccountable as to where it might have disappeared to...giving an explanation that it was not to any contractual obligations or loan to another Gov't Dept or another ally Nation[as there would then have to be a record of it and a contractual type agreement or acknowledgement...and even if it were a under the table kind of covert support...3 Trillion is unprecedented...and makes no sense.] So, what happened? Another hi-jacked jet airliner just happens to go for the Pentagon the next day..but only no credible witnesses saw it..no film record..in fact no debris from a jet airliner,the building showed only a missile shaped object could possibly be considered to have been the culprit..yet, that suggestion is vehemently denied by the admin.
...and it hit the accounting dept. on the day 'outside' [no military, non Gov't] accountants are there to examine the books. [and my first cousin, A.C., son of my moms' sister and her 2nd husband that was L.A. Metro police 1947 to 1967, CIA liaison to the Saigon Police Dept. 1968 to 1974, Top Field Agent for the DEA in Ecuador and Peru, 1975 to 1991,... he was an accountant a C.P.A. with both a degree in Bus. Econ and Computer Science that worked for a 'Firm in Langley, VA. from 1984 until recently...so, please don't retort that the Pentagon doesn't have its' own accountants...Rumsfeld set those poor unsuspecting souls up...if He or the Admin did have anything to do with 9/11 as many Americans have only recently had given indication that they now believe ...a number of which is still too small as to catch the notice from the vast majority of Americans that refuse to even listen let alone consider that these allegations might at least be somewhat, if not wholly, true.
The timing of the release date on the vid. and the spiral clouds in Norway, Mexico, Australia, Moscow, etc. that all occurred that month in 2010 has given me good reason to consider this Western Canada phenomena is just as valid.
Then again, who am I to say anything about the subject?
So, am I saying this is legit? ...well no, I'm not...I'm just ,SAYING.