Astrologers' Community  

Go Back   Astrologers' Community > Anything Else... > General Chat > Hot topic arena

Hot topic arena As the title suggest, this sub-board is dedicated to non-astrological talks on interesting, important or controversial topics.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-18-2012, 06:27 PM
Gris87 Gris87 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1
The theory of the birth of the universe

In 2011, the year was awarded the Nobel Prize researchers have found that the peripheral galaxies of the universe is not only removed from the center of the universe with the greatest speed, and acceleration. For me, what is surprising is that the winners in this case was not observed for the galaxies located near the center of the universe, because if they did, they would have discovered that the universe is "Milky Way" is also moving with acceleration. Perhaps these observations were made, but they kept silent, hoping to receive the award in 2012.
Such a high score provoking, and above all the United States of America, investing billions of dollars of research to find the accelerating force of the galaxy. The desire to save the funds of the international community in an era of global crisis - one of the reasons for writing this letter. I believe that such forces do not exist, since the characteristics of the galaxy do not change their movement since its birth. What is the cause of the observed acceleration, see below (referred to as "third letter").
Just in the midst of the debates of the Council of Europe on measures for overcoming the economic crisis, the news sounded sensation: - in the Greater European kalayzere found "bazon ...". Without this message, I would not have learned that there was a historical milestone in the underdevelopment of science. As well as 200-300 years ago, scientists using the latest technology, looking at the same time, "caloric ether" and "broadcast teplorodny" - combining them with a common name - "bazon." I understand that the staff of a large kalayzera not want to be saved on EU financing for their projects, but whether it is necessary to engage in pseudoscience.
Listed above - indicates that the physics of how basic science - degraded. And this is understandable. If 100 years ago, the most talented and gifted scholars were engaged primarily in basic science, it is now high research intensity of industrial products has led to fundamental physics that are handled by experts, not demanded in practical physics.
I want to remind the contents of their first two letters. It has been almost forty years ago, and I, twenty, had the stupidity to write a letter to the popular science television program. Ahead of me was the whole life and I was concerned about the prospect of destroying the planet "Earth" by the thermonuclear explosion in the underground testing of nuclear warheads fourth, fifth, etc. generations. Any evidence that my letter had its effect, I do not have, but soon the Soviet Union declared a moratorium on underground testing of weapons and suggested that the United States to conclude a treaty banning underground tests. The U.S. administration has pretended that nothing happened, and saved the citizens of any information on the Soviet peace initiative. The moratorium lasted for 1 year and 7 months, after which the underground nuclear testing resumed. U.S. immediately discharged a patent for a peace initiative to ban underground tests of nuclear weapons. The Soviet Union to challenge the primacy of the initiative did not, and concluded with the United States offered a contract.
At that time there were five nuclear powers. England herself did not explored or produced, and getting all ready-made from the United States. China is clearly lagging behind the latest charges and did not develop nuclear weapons. France was invited to join the treaty, but the leadership of France, referring to the lack of powerful computers and software capable to simulate the fusion process, refused to accede to the treaty. It was not until 1988, before a series of underground nuclear tests conducted by France. The first explosion was unsuccessful. French nuclear scientists have been half a step from the explosion of the planet, namely: - 3/4 power of the explosion was obtained from domestic minerals of the planet. The test program has been reduced. All subsequent explosions from the third, held the old charges. When a series of tests was completed, France had joined the treaty banning underground testing of nuclear weapons.
In a second letter to the TV (March 1974) on the eight pages I have outlined and painted model of the solar magnetic field. In short, no illustrations will report that the magnetic field of the sun in my version, consists of two annular electromagnetic systems separated by the equator. Moreover, the field lines of magnetic flux directed towards each other. To prove this hypothesis, as permissible for use as a practical theory, I explained the occurrence of flows of electrically charged solar masses moving along the lines of magnetic flux (prominences), as a result of exceeding the permissible difference in intensity between adjacent sections (meridian) of annular electromagnetic systems, resulting in rise to an electromagnetic arc.
When, 35 years after writing the second letter, I learned the news that American scientists with a unique space-based telescope, the like of which no other country (!), Opened the Sun's magnetic field - I realized that my letter to the scientific world is not reached. And another thought struck me: the London Patent Office (if I remember correctly in the title) - is the largest in the evolution of the condition (according to Darwin) in the monkey man. The great condition of the evolutionary development of man is also the American educational system. No knowledge of graduates of this system is the history of science and no knowledge of scientific facts accepted by scientists of past years, as an axiom. For educated scientists with similar abnormalities of behavior there is the following principle: there is no patent, meaning - I'm a pioneer.
I must say that no matter how powerful would not release the sun, its capacity does not exceed 10% of the power of the internal magnetic field of the Sun.
In the second letter I just wrote about the diversity of thermonuclear processes taking place in the sun, and being retired I watch science-fiction television programs. And the hero of one of these programs was an American with a Russian (I thought, last name). The film is more than 30 years after my letter. In its proposed fusion processes occurring on the Sun diversity was observed. He reasoned as atomist-gunsmith, namely, it is claimed that the fusion of new matter in the interior of the star core part of the same element. A similar principle is required in an atomic weapon, but is not required for the star: the nucleus of hydrogen (proton) in the interior of the star makes no difference to what the kernel (any item) to join, creating a new nucleus of an atom of a chemical element per atomic number greater than the original.

The third letter

I do not remember from whom I first heard, but I'm sure many of you reading this letter have heard aphorism: - "Nature abhors a vacuum."
I suggest to you the saying of: - the nature of emptiness is not!
If you take me the following terms, then, hopefully, the saying becomes an aphorism.
But, first insight into my personal history. More than 40 years ago, a teacher of astronomy in the classroom at the school called the age of our planet (4.5 billion years), and then called the age of the universe (6.5 trillion years old) and I raised my hand and asked: - "Age of the planet and the universe disproportionate to the: - age of the universe inflated into 1000, why do we determine the age of the universe in the theory of explosion if the calculation result shows that our universe originated in some other way, but not as a result of explosion. "
Answer: - "The Theory of the explosion is just a hypothesis. Scientists do not know the true way of the universe, therefore, temporarily, the calculation of the age of the universe agreed to count on the theory of the explosion. "
In the absence of a vacuum in nature (the proverbial abyss) can not be a collision of two bodies flying, each with the speed of light, towards each other and from the collision, which was an explosion that created the universe.
Over the last 40 years has accumulated a lot of facts on which I can say that I know what happened, and our universe with this knowledge I want to share. But first we should mention about the properties of matter. If the poll on the street, even highly educated people call, only three states of matter: solid, liquid, gaseous, and is only thinking about the fourth recall, invented by scientists state of matter: - plasma.
For the emergence of the universe, I (hypothetically) find it necessary to have the fifth state of matter: - space. I especially think that bazon who know people are looking for and can not find, and it is unknown to the fifth state of matter, because it is in addition to properties, compressibility, expansibility, pressure - also has a mass in the form of the density (kg/m3) .
The space of the universe must be at her birth, as it is born within the universe of the older generation - the mother of the universe and of its accumulated matter.
Imagine that the one three-dimensional space is located within another three-dimensional space, for those thinking only one three-dimensional space is difficult, but possible: - the objects do not intersect with each other. When you transfer material from one universe to another is only one point, a point in space is not a point on the paper. The physical point in space has no space or volume.
This circumstance makes it impossible to obtain registration of antimatter in the experiments at the European kalayzere as simultaneously with antimatter will be received and antispace in which the anti-matter, and will be located. Watch a zero in the space this is a null result.
At the time of the birth of our universe at some point began to form a space. Distribution of space occurred (presumably) the speed of light, but the amount of mass of the substance was such that the density of the space in the i-Hilbert spherical volume around the center of the universe was equal to the planetary density of matter in bulk form. As a natural form of matter, I guess the substance in the solid state.
During the first cycle followed by a second generation space. When his education was part of the energy expended to move the mass of a spherical layer of the first cycle. As a result, energy costs i-tovy spherical volume of the second cycle was less than the i-tovogo spherical volume of the first cycle. This means that the pressure and density of the space of the second cycle will be greater than the pressure and density of the space of the first cycle. The volume of the third cycle will move a lot of first-and second-cycle, etc.
The process of increasing pressure and density of the space in the center of the universe has a limit: - density of the natural substance in the universe, located in the mother's point of transformation of matter. As we approach the present value of the frequency (duty cycle), conversion of matter to be changed to achieve a certain constant value - a mode of self-regulation process.
Thanks to the extensibility of the property, namely, the displacement volume of the space from the high pressure in the area of low pressure, velocity and acceleration diagrams of the spatial sections are as follows: - layers located closer to the center of the universe have a lower speed and great acceleration, and the outer layers have a high spatial velocity and smaller acceleration. I think that after ten billion years after the birth of our universe (the value of the conditional and conjectural) difference in pressure in the first spatial layer is equal to zero, and the force of gravity acting on this layer is clearly one-sided, make this layer with the highest rate in our universe (less than the rate light) and even with a negative acceleration.
I believe that the origin of matter in our universe is the center of the black hole has reached child-bearing age in the universe, the mother. Last year, the news, I heard the announcement about the American astronomers luminous region in the remote parts of the universe from the ground toward the source of the "Big Bang". Field emission spectrum of the star lit "white dwarf", but its size field can not be a star. The report also stated that the origin of the luminous region remains unknown, even hypothetically. I believe that the American astronomers have discovered the location of the center of our universe.
Part of the spatial layers located at some distance from the center of the universe have a density corresponding to the density of the "White Dwarf" and although the space is not a natural substance, why does not he glows in the spectrum of the star, "White Dwarf". Of course, for the luminous layers of the space center of the universe is not visible, but the glow region is spherical and the location of the visual center of the universe is guessed. The presence of the luminous region indicates that the process of "Big Bang" continues at the present time.
As the consumption of natural substances in the black hole free up space in which the substance was. In the transition space into our universe, as well as a natural substance that changes its state to the opposite state. Thus, in our universe appears a natural substance in the form of atoms and molecules. The particles of matter together with the space in which they appeared, were deleted from the center of the universe at a speed of space, with their own velocity relative to its own space remains equal to zero. As the distance from the center of the universe the pressure and density of the space began to decline, but due to the coefficient of "compressibility" is still not in proportion. As a result, the space has arisen over the masses, the catalyst for the selection of which are particles of a natural substance. As a result of adhesion (absorbable), excessive weight in the space of a particle of matter there were celestial bodies, increasing in mass and size.
When the heavenly bodies have reached sufficient mass to generate a nuclear reaction, they were first-born stars. In a space with high density (kg/m3) stars are gaining weight very quickly and soon (in astronomical terms) reach catastrophic proportions. Holocaust giant stars astronomers call the supernova explosions of stars. After a supernova explosion in space is an armada of fragments, which are themselves overweight are collected in an effort to acquire the status of the star. Over time, the largest fragments of the supernova, and it works on the site of a supernova in the space formed star cluster, which is usually called galaxies.
At the present time on the same radius of the universe may be a few galaxies. This suggests that the spaces in which there are galaxies were point conversion (entry into the universe) at different times. To determine the age difference should be the distance between galaxies divided by the arithmetic mean velocity of galaxies relative to the center of the universe. By now the current method of determining the age of the universe was made by dividing the difference of velocities with respect to an unknown point in the universe. Speaking of the speed of the space, I hereby affirm that all the galaxies in the time of its existence in a state of "rest", and thus force them to change the speed does not exist.
I see the sun as a living being of inorganic origin, who need food for life. The food it can produce on their own, hunting for the excess mass of matter in space. By controlling its own magnetic field, the sun shoots in the space of their own streams of particles (flares). The initial velocity of the particles is very high and many times greater than the escape velocity, so scientists around the world believe that they ever leave the solar system, but I think that it is not.
With the ability to absorb the excess over the mass of matter in space increases the initial mass of the particle and thereby slow down their speed. Under the influence of gravitational forces of the particles reach zero velocity relative to the Sun (the cusp) and make the fall of the sun. In the space corresponding to the return point, the concentration of solar particles is very large and planets whose orbits are in the field, becoming the unwitting, and very successful thieves solar cooking.
Several billion years ago, the space density was high and the return point located in the orbit of Jupiter (on whether he is great). Concentration of overweight in the space was very high and the sun, there was no need to strain energy in the power of emissions. Over time, the density of the space in which the solar planetary system to be reduced, and the sun had to throw their arrows further. First to Saturn, and then to Uranus. The land is located in an area where solar particles move at high speed and their density is low, so the size of the Earth is small compared to Jupiter. Archaeologists estimate the weight gain of 3 cm per hundred years. These flows, when hit by the Earth, called the "meteor showers".
Attached Files
File Type: doc ThirdLetter.doc (43.0 KB, 0 views)

Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
birth, theory, universe

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Could my birth certificate be wrong? gemini59 Progressions 1 11-15-2009 10:22 PM
Planets are Living Things kk23wong Spiritual Realm 2 08-04-2009 11:00 AM
Birth time minda Read My Chart 2 07-27-2009 10:55 PM
Barack Obama's Birth Certificate Data is Invalid timashev Country and Place Astrology 25 01-13-2009 02:41 PM
A little confused with my birth chart (s). Anonymous Natal Astrology 2 07-16-2005 08:07 AM



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2005-2012, AstrologyWeekly.com. Boards' structure and all posts are property of AstrologyWeekly.com and their respective creators. No part of the messages sent on these boards may be copied without their owners' explicit consent.