Astrologers' Community  

Go Back   Astrologers' Community > General Astrology > Other Astrology > Astrology in the Aquarian Age

Astrology in the Aquarian Age A place for all those interested in how the ongoning energy shifts taking place on the Earth plane will affect astrology The purpose of this forum is to explore how astrology might incorporate the new dimensional and multiversal energies that are being integrated by lightworkers and spiritual beings on the Earth plane.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-23-2006, 04:19 PM
Elianah's Avatar
Elianah Elianah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wandering the G-24
Posts: 384
Hypothetical planets

The following is a list of hypothetical planets that Astro.com lists as absolutely not existing:

"Uranian planets" (Hamburg School):

h40 Cupido
h41 Hades
h42 Zeus
h43 Kronos
h44 Apollon
h45 Admetos
h46 Vulkanus
h47 Poseidon

Other hypothetical bodies:

h48 Transpluto-Isis
h49 Nibiru
h50 Harrington
h55 Vulcan
h56 Selena/White Moon
h57 Proserpina
h58 Waldemath Black Moon

What I am thinking is that the solar system that we inhabit is one of many probable solar systems that exist in the multidimensional multiverse. The solar system we witness is the one we "expect" to see through the human group consciousness on "this" Earth plane. In another universe the human group consciousness on its Earth plane does witness the actual physical manifestation of some or all of these hypotheticals.

Since all human consciousness of all Earth planes in all dimensions are connected, this means that even though we do not consciously "see" these planets, their energies still manifest into our plane, some more strongly than others (think Vulcan, for instance, and you'll see what I mean).

The question for me is how does one interpret the energies of hypothetical bodies when the collective consciousness on this Earth plane does not/cannot recognize them? I think that at the moment they might be more clarifiers of recognized planetary energies on this plane than truly interactive planets in their own right.

What do you think?

Note: On the poll, I was unable to list all the hypothetical bodies due to limits on options. The following are not listed: Harrington (which I do not know who that is in reference to, but it sounds pretty modern and not linked to any mythology) and Waldemath Black Moon. And I am not sure if Vulkanus and Vulcan aren't one in the same thing, so I did not include Vulkanus.

Elianah

__________________
My 2¢ worth, take what fits and ditch the rest.

Light is only a vibration and there are vibrations faster than light.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
hypothetical, planets

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2005-2012, AstrologyWeekly.com. Boards' structure and all posts are property of AstrologyWeekly.com and their respective creators. No part of the messages sent on these boards may be copied without their owners' explicit consent.