I have a Leo asc.
15 degrees.
Sag. decante.
Cancer sun 29 degrees.
on the cusp of Leo.
Pisces decante.
Gemini dwad...I believe, almost think.
Leo moon, 23th degree.
This is in tropical.
In vedic I have cancer asc, 22nd degree, cancer sun, 4th degree.
Leo moon, degree 0.
Asc aspects in tropical, to leo asc are, mars, and Pluto sextile, 8 degree, 9 degree orb.
Saturn sextile, 1 degree orb.
Those planets are conj.
Moon is conj asc.
kind of wide, but whatever.....
Neptune trines moon, exact. So neptune trine asc but your looking at 9 degree orb for that trine.
With a leo asc that puts the ruler, the sun, in the 12th house on the cusp of leo in cancer.
I notice enough how cancer I am, somewhat, I can tell I shcare qualities of both, but, and this is in tropical as well, I also have venus in the first degree of cancer.
My chart is on another thread, I think you've seen it.
My ugly mug.
I was mimicking an old David Letterman picture I seen of him holding a basketball sticking out his toung at the camera during a high school picture. I thought it was funny.
I think I look like more like gravel face Micky Rourke instead. ha.
My height 6' 4" could be caused by a few different things, maybe Sag decante. BUt I've also seen short sag decantes. It's not from genetics entierly, I am the tallest in the family, the family that i know of.
I've read decante descriptions of signs that are not alwayas accurate as well, but they are sometimes accurate. It would be nice to fine tune things more, but it seems not everything fits in a nice virgo like box. The attempt is admirable though and usefull at times.
Reason I posted the pics is because, progressed, in tropical, I have an early Virgo asc. Mercury has progressed from the 12th to the first and into virgo.
I have a Jupiter mars conj. in Scorpio sextile asc from the third house.
Sun is in Leo, 12th house....
Venus in Leo, 11th H.
I havn't seen you chart.
Natally, the only thing I have in scorpio is Jupiter on the IC line, 3rd house, 1 degree off the angle.
I look at leo asc. every now and then, but I'm not an expert at spoting everyone by asc. Most often I notice the sun, sometimes the moon, especially in personality. I confuse that but minly in woman I notice the moon first. If I see red hair in the case of a Caucasian of any kind, I go to aries in mind first, because I've noticed it allot. It isn't so helpful when it comes to anyone not Caucasian and it isn't always accurate.
I have read that if you see more angular features, look to for cardinal sines.
Not all aries have red hair, sometimes it can just be a mars placement, maybe in the first house, but even taht is not always accurate, so I really don't know. It is strange sometimes to spot the red head kid in the family when there are no other red head kids, parents, or grandparents in the family, and notice a stellium in Aries, or a mars on the asc. I've done that before. Or even just an Aries sun.
For aries sun I always see the face as angular, many times a strait nose, and there is at times a forward head, or a direct look, what I mean by forward head is that they tend to look out and direct at whatever is across from then......I have seen similar looks in cancers, even if the flow is reversed.....signs 4 to the right of another seem to be more of a complete opposite in action then those that oppose one another.
The zodiac is strange to me in that way.
I even see Virgo as more of a complete opposite of action then Gemini, even if they traditionally share the same rulers.
Gemini stands outside a mutable explosion, a thought sign, deals with similarities in thought. Virgo looks in on an object from the outside rather then having that exploding action....they sort of focus all their attention in and on matter instead....then they differentiate, seeing all the small details, differences....I suppose if I drew a diagram for the two signs, and I have seen these elsewhere, it would look like this.
Smaller then how I thought the image would turn out....my bad.
Anyway, that is ow I see virgo, and the dispersal (mutable) signs.
The 4th over is more of an opposite action then the opposing sign.
Virgo tends to introvert into matter so is more realistic.
Gemini is more outside the action, and separated from the action, deals more with abstract thought...even though Virgo is abstract as well.
Pisces inflows from it's environment upon itself, the sensitivity, etc.
Sag. outflows into it's environment....from a central viewpoint...hence, the outflowing ego, or viewpoint. Fire moves forward at times without allot of data....not very practical, can be unaware of what is to come...adventure, etc. but they see what is right in front of them.
Sag has a tendency to see things how they are directly.
Pisceshas a tendency to see things all as one, or the same.
Gemini has a tendency to see the similarities between things.
Virgo sees differences, detail, the differences between things.
It looks like.
Disassociation
Identification
Similarities
Differences
I'd like to work more with the flows of signs, and how they handle energy, then try placing planets in, in houses as well, and somehow get a better picture of what a persons natural tendencies seem to be.
I think allot of what ew observe about people is far more basic then what we like to think. Gemini with communication, well, if a persons natural tendency it to use a dispersal like that, then naturally, they are going to have to communicate well to be that way. I suppose I'm looking for more fundamental basics. It all seems very psychological.....almost more then physical...the physical manifestations may just come about by how a person lives their life.
Put mars in the asc, and I suppose the chances of them getting a cut on the face is more likely by how they go about their life. I don't think everyone is going to get a scar on their face. Events turn out as they will, and fire seems to go into the unknown with less fear....because it doesn't know...so there can be accidents and carelessness, but also what appears to be luck may not be and may have more to do with being in the right place at the right time...something Sagittarius is quite capable of at times.
not allot is planned, thought out, based upon "reality" etc. There can be luck. Not know.
I'm not sure why I typed all of that. lol
Anyway, yeah.
I thought maybe a Leo asc....tropical.
It's just a guess though.
I havn't seen the chart and i could be totally wrong.
i've never read anything covering astrology and appearance that has pleased me entirely. I always spot flaws, but sometimes I can surprise myself by getting at least the sun, the moon or the asc. Then after looking at a chart, a few things start to make sense.
Still learning, still unlearning.
I didn't do a spell check either....I'm sure you noticed that. haha
In a rush....
TS