I do not see Jupiter as being peregrine.
Jupiter is not in Sagittarius, Pisces or Cancer, not in his own Triplicity, not in his own Term and not in his own Decan. He's Peregrine.
He has a strong mutual reception with Venus.
No, that's a sextile. That's weak mutual reception and it's by Sign/House.
That doesn't alter the fact that Jupiter is not in any of his dignities and still Peregrine. However, it does lessen and take away the evil, and a received Planet is able to bear its burdens easier.
Jupiter is a Benefic, and not impeded by any Planet, and in mutual reception by Sign/House with Venus, so Jupiter is a true pilgrim here. He is not malicious by any stretch of the imagination.
Some would argue this...so be it. However, Jupiter, peregrine or not, would rule a foreigner, a student, etc. If Jupiter was peregrine it would moreso indicate a wanderer or rogue; not someone you could generally trust in this matter. Thus, I do not see Jupiter as peregrine.
Jupiter would be a wanderer only if not in reception with any Planet and a rogue only if impeded.
Peregrine Planets are not inherently malicious (unless they are a Malefic in poor condition or they are made unfortunate), in spite of what Lily says.
A Peregrine Planet in square or opposition to a Malefic (or to Sun or Mercury), or in square or opposition to a Benefic and not received is malicious.
The Moon and Jupiter so close in the chart also would indicate symbolically that the querent and the helpful person are also already close. They are in the same house.
And given that Pisces is the 2nd House, it could literally be someone in their own household, a parent, sibling, room-mate. And they might work at a bank, or financial institution, or work in some licensed profession, like a law firm.
Also, there are so many versions of the essential diginites that it becomes an arguable point whether everyone is in the right reception to begin with!
There aren't that many. There are the Egyptian, Ptolemaic, Lily's modified version of Ptolemy, and Bonatti's modified version of the Egyptian.
They aren't all that different. I mean we aren't talking about anything radical here. Ptolemy and Lily both give 7 degrees to Mercury in Aries, the Egyptians give 8 degrees.
Many of the disagreements are in the last degrees for the Malefics.
Lily gives 4 degrees to Mars in Taurus, the Egyptians give 3 degrees and Ptolemy gives 6 degrees.
There are a couple of major differences, Lily gives the first 6 degrees of Leo to Saturn, but the Egyptians and Ptolemy give those to Jupiter.
Ptolemy and Lily give the first degrees of Aquarius to Saturn, but the Egyptians give them to Mercury.
The other is Mercury/Venus in Libra.
Again, the differences are rather minor.
I used what I thought were Ptolemy's Pterms and they didn't work, so I said nasty things about Ptolemy and switched to Egyptian Terms, and then I found out I wasn't using Ptolemy's Pterms, I was using Lily's mucked up version of Ptolemy's Pterms and then I found a table of Ptolemy's Ptrue Pterms and started using those, and they worked much better.
You ought to consider the fact that the OP is a South African. The possibility that Jupiter could be someone of Dutch, British, Belgian, German, Polish, French or Portuguese origin, or one of several Indian ethnic groups, or a Zulu or Xhosa (and others) or Malaysian or Indonesian is very high, and that would be Peregrine Jupiter here.