Well, the OP removed himself from the thread and presumably from the forum.
Without going back and quoting people, here are some thoughts about this chart, this thread, and people's feelings.
Regarding the chart...it really wouldn't matter if someone wanted to discover if aliens abducted the plane (although it does seem as if the news outlets are beginning to have evidence that the plane was hijacked); casting a horary chart for this type of event isn't the way to go. As has already been pointed out on several of the threads here at AW about the flight, as well as on the many, many other astrology forums out there.
Let's just use a bit of logic here. Imagine that every astrologer decided at some point over the last several days to query the Universe and cast a chart about this plane. How many charts, with how many ascendants, would we end up with? Too many. That is why we use an event chart for these matters, as Zarathu has already done on another thread. I personally am not in possession of enough time (I have other charts working) or interest, but if I did I would want to look at the chart from the moment the flight took off, and possibly compare it to a chart for the moment the plane disappeared from radar.
The OP stated a desire to learn horary, and to use this chart to do so. A mistake, for certain, but having that pointed out is not a reason to abruptly pull out of a forum in a huff after stating that believing in astrology was on par with believing in aliens and choosing to decide his/her fellowship after the responses of two members. I'm sorry, but that is the behavoir of someone who is either too sensitive to be on a forum, or someone who is looking to create trouble. Just my own opinion/experience.
Lilly himself did at least once cast a chart to determine the fate of an overdue ship. The difference between this (and any other curiousity chart) is the the querent in that case had a vested interest in the ship. So in the case of the missing plane, if a family member of one of the passengers or crew went to an astrologer to discover the fate of the flight, that chart would be valid. Otherwise. NO.
To speak to gentleness. This is an internet forum. Again in my own opinion, if you are too sensitive to participate then it is perfectly fine to chose not to do so. You (as in the generic you) are going to be exposed to opinions you don't like or agree with, to people who are not always terrific at communicating, to people who are using a language that is not native to them, to people who only have an ax to grind, to people who genuniely want to help but come from the school of tough love...here is my adivce. Grow a thicker skin, build a bridge and get over it. Astrologers come in all shapes and sizes. Some are looking for and in agreement with the kumbaya idea that every idea/opinion expressed has merit and should weigh the same; some believe that astrology needs to have structure and meaning otherwise it lacks value. Above all, astrologers are people. People have great moments and not so great moments. And as much as we would like to think we are the only ones who are allowed to have those not so great moments and yet still should expect everyone else to behave or react perfectly in accordance to the "gentleness" and teaching spirit and whatever else has been expressed here...
You are living in a glass house. Unless you yourself are perfect, it isn't kind or gentle or even terribly realistic for you to expect perfection from others.
This thread: Was posted in the horary forum, and every single post that does not pertain to horary or the chart is completely off topic and against the rules of the AW horary forum. Including mine. I understand that there are many ways to read horary charts (I don't agree with them, but then I am a traditional astrologer) but there are also rules to posting here that ought to be observed. Not that they always are. Some of those rules pertain to the forums in which we are posting, some of them pertain to the way we are to behave when posting. If the behavior breaks those rules, it is within the bounds of members to point it out. If the moderators choose, they will become involved. If you don't like the rules...well. That would be part of the problem, right?