You mean like Santorini is Atlantis? That's what scholars say.
"Santorini fits Plato's description." Really?
Santorini is an island-continent? Then how come the neither the Greeks nor the Egyptians ever referred to Corsica, Elba, Sicily, Crete, Cyrpus or half a dozen other islands as "island-continents" when those islands were 5x bigger than Santorini ever hoped to be?
Where's the evidence of a citadel/fortress on a hill?
Where's the evidence of the inter-locking canals and roads?
Where's the evidence of harbors with masked entrances to the sea?
Santorini is "beyond the Pillar of Hercules (the Rock of Gibraltar)? Really? Um, okay.
That really meets Plato's description alright.
It's the same with this thing here. Does it have an ellipsoidal orbit? No. Does it move clockwise? No. Is it below the Plane of the Ecliptic? No. Is it red in color? No. Well, then it doesn't meet the description of Nibiru. They found something to be sure, but not Nibiru.
That's typical of mainstream academia. They fear anything that doesn't fit the currently accepted paradigm. If you want to see university professors turn white as a sheet and shake and tremble with fear, just mention Maulden Island.
It's a little speck out the middle of nowhere in the Pacific Ocean, maybe 1 to 3 miles in diameter. It has basalt roads criss-crossing it and leading right up the water's edge. That's nice, except Maulden Island isn't volcanic.
So, did basalt rock float 1,200 miles across the Pacific and neatly stack itself into roads? I don't think so.
It gets better. The island is dotted with granite block temples. The nearest source of granite is 3,000 miles away. So, who was transporting 1, 2 and 5 ton granite blocks across 3,000 miles of ocean (and why -- why Maulden Island)?
It gets better still. Of all the suspects (peoples/tribes) living on the Pacifc
Rim, none know how to work granite.
In Roratonga there's a city, actually metropolis would be a better word, that's submerged mostly but a few buildings are partially submerged. It would have housed about 1 Million people. No one has a clue who built it. The natives nearby won't go there. They say it's haunted.
I'll only mention that because "scholars" are always so quick to point out that Plato says "Atlantis sank" and we all know that islands cannot sink.
Except Plato never said that. The Greek word is "innundated." Atlantis didn't sink, it was flooded. Solon says the Priest at Sais told him about 10,000 years ago which would have put it around 10,500 BCE to 11,000 BCE, right when we know for a fact that the Earth's average temperature rose 7° in 57 years and the sea levels rose 400 to 800 feet (depending on the source you cite).
If the sea levels rose 400 to 800 feet, you think maybe a few islands in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans "sank," you know, were innundated, totally flooded? I think it would be fair to say a few did.
Here's the proof:
That's what the Gulf of Mexico, Florida, Cuba and the Bahamas would look like if you dropped the sea level 400 feet.
Recognize that? That's the Canary Islands. Actually, Canary Island (singular) if you drop the sea level 400 feet.
Some things are taboo. Scholars fear the truth, whatever that is, and it isn't garden-variety fear, it's deathly fear. The past they tell us about is nothing like what actually happened.
I doubt it. The evidence now suggests we're in a Maunder Minimum and if true, that would be most unfortunate.
During the last Maunder Minimum people starved to death. It appears that it might have been aggravated by volcanic eruptions, but still, can you imagine if the US could not grow winter wheat above latitude 40?
A growing season of 6 to 8 weeks for New England, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Montana, Wyoming, North and South Dakota, and half of Ohio, Indiana and Illinois?
Sure, people survived for several million years at least. I used to see Madeline Briskine over at University of Cincinnati all the time. Her studies show that the Earth undergoes a serious cataclysmic event every 435,000 years on average. Figure 432,000 years is 120 orbits of Nirbiru.
120 years. Seen that number somewhere before? Sure you have. Think about it.
To answer your question truthfully, no, probably no one will survive.
If you want to do serious research, you need a serious bible, one that has the ancient Hebrew, westernized Hebrew and English together line by line. The KJV is totally useless and so are all others. I bought mine at the Heberw Union University a few blocks across the way. I go there a lot because they have an interesting lecture series and you get to talk shop with the rabbis. So, yes, Nephilim is plural and it does mean "those who from heaven came to Earth" or " those who were cast upon Earth" depending on the particle proceeding it and the context of usage, and you'll see the word Nephilim in westernized Hebrew, along with nahash (serpent/snake) and in the prophetic books the phrases for "the Day of the Lord" and "the Lord of Hosts." You'll recognize that those words are Akkaddian/Shumerian words that the Hebrews borrowed (after all Abraham/Abrahm was an Akkaddian from the city of Nibri).
Now when you're reading the prophecies, everything makes sense. When Ezekiel or Isaiah say "On the Day of the Lord" = On the Day Nirbiu returns to that point in the Asteroid Belt = "the Earth will reel to and fro like a drunkard."
And that's the good news. The bad news is after reeling to and fro the Earth is turned upside down and kicked out of its orbit killing everyone.
So, you have a Nippurian/Hebrew/Jewish calendar that ends in 6,000 years, the end of the 6,000 years is around 2236 CE, and you have Nibiru last here in 1394 BCE, and returning in 2206 CE or so and then you have old testament prophecies predicting how the Earth will be destroyed.
See how everything dovetails so nicely together?
. 
!!!
Linear Mode
