Mandy
Well-known member
Re: loaded question, to Tamara
I'm sorry,
I didnt have anything against your title. I participated in discussion before Tim had posted and I never made such a statement, which should support my claim. In thinking about the OP and JUPITERASC's position, I thought that Tim made an excellent point. Thats all. It was a point that opened my eyes to my way of thinking about the subject. Honestly, my last reply was in no way implicitly directed at the title of the thread, though I can understand how it could have easily been misinterpreted. To be clear, Tamara, I find your posts always intelligent and well informed. I am yet to see one that isnt. Here, Tim helped me to acknowledge a more direct route to thinking about JUPITERASC's post. I hope that clarifies things. Again, I apologise if I had offended you momentarily.
I'm sorry,
I didnt have anything against your title. I participated in discussion before Tim had posted and I never made such a statement, which should support my claim. In thinking about the OP and JUPITERASC's position, I thought that Tim made an excellent point. Thats all. It was a point that opened my eyes to my way of thinking about the subject. Honestly, my last reply was in no way implicitly directed at the title of the thread, though I can understand how it could have easily been misinterpreted. To be clear, Tamara, I find your posts always intelligent and well informed. I am yet to see one that isnt. Here, Tim helped me to acknowledge a more direct route to thinking about JUPITERASC's post. I hope that clarifies things. Again, I apologise if I had offended you momentarily.
Last edited: