I've been lazy today! Just now got printer ink so I can print some charts, and the "wild" grandchildren, (as opposed to my "girly-girl" ones, haha, ) coming in the am, so I'll have to post later tomorrow.
Thinking about the DOJ investigation; it does sound like they are serious. Can they consider GZ past history of violence? Also FB, twitter of GZ as well as Taffee? That's great. They are going to be flooded; I hope people use some discretion as to not inundate them and slow the investigation.
I'm also thinking about Judge Nelson. What the hell happened with her! She ignored 2 sequestration violations, after admitting she was aware of them. (Donnelly and the video animation guy.
She allowed the animation which she pointed out was false in some respects.
She left out the "initial aggressor" section of jury instructions. And more; just cannot think of instances right now.
I saw her age early on; she's 58 or 59-cannot remember. But she may very well be going through her 2nd Saturn Return, which would be appropriate for a high profile trial like this. She wants on the FL Supreme Court-has applied 2 x before. How did this play into her handling of the case? She was a child advocate judge-what happened to that part of her personal and professional history? She could have done lots more for Trayvon; why did she forsake him?
re: Juror B 37: Just sickening to listen to that interview. "boy of color" !?! where did that come from-the 1940's in the South!? And just couldn't bring herself to say GZ shot him. There were no "riots" in Sanford. Didn't anyone else on the jury correct her? She could only say "George" (that familiarity is disgusting) made some mistakes, or something to that effect, also that the dispatcher "egged" him on. She clearly did not hear the part on the tape where he said not to follow. And it was so heartbreaking to hear evidence that she totally discounted Rachel's testimony. Probably a lot of people did. I don't what Pros. could have done about that.
I missed that about "outside info."', but sorry, cannot bear to listen to it again.
Jurors aren't supposed to discuss the trial with anyone, are they? Does she really expect us to believe she didn't discuss it with her LAWYER husband?
And how did she broker a deal on a CNN interview and a book deal within 48 hours of the verdict?!?
Her behavior is really suspect. She MUST have heard news reports and discussed the case with her husband and others before the trial. She jumps on the publicity wagon, then says she needs to retreat and go back to her life. Yea, right. (Maybe I should iron an apron and send it to her; one of those bib-type ones with rick rack trim my Mom used to wear when I was a little girl).
"No choice" but to decide NG? What about more clarifications on manslaughter-which they just dropped. I wonder who bullied who in that jury. The other jurors sure wanted to distance themselves from her quickly enough.
Tomorrow I'll get busy. Moon aspects during deliberations, including VOC and retro. GZ Solar return 2012. The shooting chart. GZ solar return (SR) 2013: as there is an eclipse 11.3 at 11 scorp, conj. GZ prog. sun and SR saturn. 11.1 is 4th Uranus squar pluto at 13 scorp.
Teb, thanks for mentioning that uran squar pluto! An astrologer that posted, I think it was Neptunerising, gave a link to an astrologer-Lynn Hayes? who made a connection with some aspects with the prog. US chart-I want to go back and read her comments-they were illuminating.
I do think this travesty of injustice is a catalyst for awareness and change in racial issues in the US. It's very painful at first, like the surgeon making his initial incision.
George Zimmerman's middle name is Pandora.