Planets are Living Things

kk23wong

New member
Under one simply hypothesis that "Planets are living things." It is my greatest pressure to announce my lastest discovery. This hypothesis has been proved by facts mentioned in the following article. Please take this serious.

----------------[Document 1]----------------

Theory of the Similarity of Lives
Presence of God or Conscious Earth


BY Wong Ka Kit, Teru
Hong Kong, China
Published on 29 July 2009

The debate of the existence of god always lied on imagination of an afterlife or the existences of different universes. Most of these arguments are not established on solid ground, but derived from legends and religious sects. Ones should open up your eyes and look at the world around us. We can only find out the truth by looking into the reality but not by our imagination. In this case, different categories of sciences which have gone through numerous breakthroughs help to get us back onto the right track to the question. Nowadays, we recognized that other planets nearby have shown evidences of the presence of water a long time ago. In another word, it represented that there are living organisms once living on those planets. In terms of our new technology breakthroughs and scientific discoveries, we found that our earth is not the sore planet which has habitants. In the below, I am going to elaborate some controversial phenomenon one by one with one simple hypothesis as follow: Planets (as well as “Sun”) are living things with their own wills. They are not objects, but they have shown the creatures of lives which are similar to animals and insects inside our planet. Obviously, it is not sorely a philosophical question, but it is a hypothesis based on the facts which comes across the fields of astronomy, biology and various religious sects. It may be the ultimate answer of many mysteries on earth which worth our concerns and efforts to discover with.

The statements below are more detailed descriptions of this philosophical theory.


1. Sun is the centre of our solar system which is a relatively small eco-system with comparison to the one of our galaxy. The existence of sun is male in the universe which equivalent to the one in our Mother Nature.


2. Other planets, like the one we are living in, are equivalent to female in the solar system. To a large extent, the planet that we are living in is playing the role as our mother in the universe. In biological point of view, the role of female is the candle of lives (in various different forms such as springs, eggs and seeds). Therefore, planets are the mother(s) of all living organisms inside them. It is apparently not a symbolic or theoretical assumption but it is the truth with regards to our modern biology.


3. The procedures of reproduction activities (which are related to the basic concept of biology) between sun and planet(s) are as follow (not in sequences):

First, Sun give out sunlight and arrived at the planets. Then, planets give birth to micro-organisms with the presence of water components inside them. After a prolonged period of time, micro-organisms inside the planets have evolved into more and more complex forms of living organisms and multiplied by folds to create a very sophisticated mechanism (our eco-system) on earth nowadays.

4. Planets have the ability of controlling all substances inside them (which is a gift given by their birth) including all living organisms inside. To be more specific, she can read through our minds and even influence our thoughts. To be more specific, she has ALL sorts of interactions with all the living organisms inside the planet. To a large extent, the connections in-between human beings and the planet cannot be ceded. As a result, our thoughts can create a certain degree of impacts on the reality around us. Despite of our actions which have changed the earth physically, the will of the planet (our mother) has chosen some of our thoughts to turn them into real by her power from birth according her own will. This is a very important view of my theories.

5. All living thing are destined to dead. This is ironic, but true. Planets are also incapable of escaping from the fate of death. We have failed to discover any living things in the nearby planets because they are extinct out of unknown causes. One more thing to be added is that we are not certain whether the nearby planets themselves are still alive or not because their bodies (in case, their physical existences) are still existed in our solar system. Our space missions have reported that there are no symptoms of lives in the nearby planets. We can obtain the reasons account for this situation from our planet. The exploitation of the natural resources has resulted in unrecoverable damage to our eco-system nowadays. The outcome will be disastrous. The vast consumption of natural resources and pollution by human (equivalent to other intelligent races which once inhabited in other planets) has gradually resulted in the collapse of the eco-system on earth. In the meantime, the dramatic changes in climate have accelerated the speed of the arrival of the end of world.


This is a philosophical view developed from my own observations of this world and accumulation of knowledge from different aspects of sciences and philosophy. My theory is open to public criticisms.

Every species living on earth are implementing different forms of reproductions. Planets themselves are alive and maintain their cycle of lives by a unique form of reproduction in the solar system. They have undergone similar processes of lives as all the species inside them did. The planets surrounding us are dead, but the earth we are living in still alive. Our mother (the earth) is too arrogant and she has recognized herself as various god(s). She created different religion sects and gave herself an honourable image by using the advantage of her “power” inside her body (in the planet). She does not realize that her actions are very irrational and have already bought us (her children) to the brink of extinctions. We can see people suffering from diseases, poverty and wars. Pains are everywhere, but she just admires herself as the god of mercy and well beings. She even asks her children to pray to her. At the meanwhile, human just simply ignore the poor and have turned themselves into the thirst of knowledge and wealth. The actions of our mother (the earth) have reflected her lack of understandings of the universe. She has already lost herself in her own imagination of live and death and her heart struggle in-between the bright (good) and dark (evil) sides. Such kind of heart struggles has been transformed into real by the wars among human races or countries in the history of earth. Her desire of being honoured and prayed has been fulfilled by the establishment and flourish of various religious sects.
Philosophy and Sciences are the doorways to the truth. (No matter you approved this statement or not. It is my personal view.) It has been diversified into different categories such as philosophy of history, religions and sciences. We have to combine all sorts of knowledge into one in order to get the ultimate answer of lives. Even though my hypothesis is correct, we still cannot find out the person who has created all these or how it has been created. To be more specific, I am referring to the origin of the universe. This theory of “living” planets will widen the definitions of “living things” or so-called “lives”. If my hypothesis can be successfully implied, it would be a breakthrough in philosophy. Be more open-minded to my theory. Please be reminded that it is not only a religious matter and very close to the truth in a great extent.


Below are further elaborations of this theory.


For the diversification of religious beliefs in our world, we can have an almost perfect explanation for their formations and popularities under this theory. As I have mentioned above, earth is conscious and has her own will. The religious beliefs revealed the uncertainty of the nature of lives and our unrests aroused from the fear of death. The imaginary of an after-life and mysterious power (in this case, I prefer to describe it as the power of the planet given by birth). The earth (who is our mother in the universe) also experienced similar confusions. She has the power to control all substances inside the planet (her body) and established the world according to her own wills through different methods. Her existence is somehow a mystery to all of us since she seldom speak to us, although she is capable to talk to us through her ability to manipulate the vibrations of our tympanum theoretically. Our mother has successfully created various religions by using her power given by birth. Instead of playing the role as a mother, she preferred to give herself an honorable image of god. God is more likely to describe as the highest morale standard. It should not be applied to the one who only obtain the power but she simply has not reached this morale standard. Various religious sects has highlighted the idea that “god is everywhere around us”. However, everyone can see others or even themselves are suffering from diseases, poverty and wars. The only thing that they do not go too far is that, "We are sons and daughters" of “this god (mother)”. She has the non-resistible power that we usually describe it as power of god, but she does not have the morale standard to be the one that most of us have been imagined of.


Apart from giving a satisfactory answer to religious questions, the hypothesis has also explained all the beliefs in other supernatural power (or some may recognized these beliefs as “superstitions”). Earth is conscious and would like to build up her ideal world that can be fulfilled by her power which enabled her to turn all of her imagination into reality (or simply fake and failed outcome that we are suffering from now). The power of the earth comes from birth which is similar to our abilities to control our own bodies. However, this ability is limited to a certain extent. For instance, she (the earth) can move the continental plates but not a single rock itself. A rock is incapable of moving by itself because it does not have any dynamic power, but the plates can be moved by the activities of the magma of the mantle. This reflected that the earth also has limitations in controlling her body (the planet). She (the earth) can control all living organisms both physically and mentally. We (and all living organisms) have our own “free will”, but the earth is capable of reading and controlling our thoughts silently. This shown there are hidden connections and interactions in-between all living things inside the planet and our mother (the earth). She is everywhere inside her body. In which, she is able to control every single details including our fate. There are no doubts that we have our free wills, but she has manipulated us at the same time. This explained why some may believe in fate or destiny. Fate and destiny are really existed on earth because our mother (the earth) has made it become real. Besides, she can control the smallest particulars inside the planet which enabled her to control natural phenomenon such as rain and wind. It has explained the miracles which consisted of many strange scenes in many (religious) legends worldwide.


Planets have their own reproduction method(s) and the universe has formed a unique ecological system like the one inside the earth. A number of planets have formed a relatively small eco-system to become a galaxy and a vast number of galaxies have formed a larger eco-system that we have named it after the “universe”. We can observe through our electronic microscopes nowadays and being further explored by our modern technology and sciences. Philosophy is not something that only existed in our thinking, but it have to be proved by facts in reality.

----------------[Document 2]----------------


New Directions of Astronomy
A Branch of the New Enlightenment Movement

BY Wong Ka Kit, Teru
Hong Kong, China
Published on 16 July 2009

With regards to the Theory of the Similarities of Lives, we have come much closer to the answer of the question of the existence of living organisms in other planets. The principle of this theory that all planets are living things DOES NOT necessary to be one of the factors influencing on this new discovery or theory.

Scientist(s) has/have point(s) out that the decisive factor(s) of the existence of living organisms on (a) planet(s) is/are (1) the Orbit(s) or the distance(s) from sun in a solar system; (2) the existence of Water/H2O/Oxygen.
The major breakthroughs come from (1) the natural mechanism(s) of the temperature control inside planet; (2) the exchanges of different forms of chemical component(s) inside a planet. (Please refer to my “Theory of the Similarities of Chemicals Exchanges” for details.)

First, some scientists suggest that the orbit(s) or distance(s) from Sun in solar system is a decisive factor. It can be replaced by the phenomenon of a natural mechanism which manipulated/moderated/adjust the temperature inside a planet. Such kind(s) of natural mechanism of temperature control can be observed by and evaluated from the earth. The Polar [Pole(s)] is/are one of the evidences showing the existence of such kind(s) of mechanisms. Therefore, neither the distances from sun nor the orbit(s) of the planet are the most decisive factors account for the formation(s)/occurrence(s)/creation(s) of any living organism(s).

Second, the existence(s) of “Water/H2O/Oxygen” inside other planet(s) is/are NOT (a) factor(s) for denying the formation(s)/occurrence(s)/creation(s) of any living organism(s) inside them. All planets contain a certain amount of chemical component(s) inside itself. The form(s) of the chemical components depended on the temperature and other factor(s), but they are all provided inside the planet itself. These chemical components can be transformed into a vast variety of form(s) such as liquid, solid, semi-liquid and gas. The key for landing on other planet (e.g. Mars) is not searching for the symptom(s)/hidden threads to the (1) existence of “Water/H2O/Oxygen” which regarded as the fundamental elements for living organisms to survive with; or (2) existence of living organism(s); or (3) the existence of Gases (e.g. Oxygen) since it can be transformed into any other chemical(s) by some unknown causes.

Third, one more point I would like to put forward here is a clue which can be easily observable by simply looking up the sky at night. The stars that we can see are the reflections by sunlight. As a result, all planets that we can observe in the sky at night must be reachable by sunlight theoretically. Sunlight is the basic element for all living organisms.

All planets are alike but they are not same in sizes and densities. These points above do not necessarily prove all planets have living organism(s), but they have proved that the direction(s) of our astronomy nowadays is/are wrong.

----------------[Document 3]----------------


Theory of the Similarities of Chemical Exchanges
New Concept on the chemical exchange processes

BY Wong Ka Kit, Teru
Hong Kong, China
Published on 14 July, 2009

“Oceanic Living Concept” is not the sole way to slow down the pace of the “Lighters’ Effects” and eliminates the issue of Global Warming. The key is not only the Ocean Current(s) as I have mentioned in my article before. Another key element or possible solution lied on the “Photosynthesis” process taken place in-between plants and animals. The eco-system on the continent (what I am referring to is the “Litho-sphere” and “Hydro-sphere”) is relied on the photosynthesis processes taken place among the living organisms. Applying the same phenomenon into the Ocean(s), the process of the interexchange in-between Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide has another form(s) inside the Ocean(s). The breakthrough in my new concept comes from here. The researches on the biological or chemical processes of photosynthesis can also be applicable to the one beneath water. It is an inter-exchanges (or transformations) of the Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide. Carbon is the key factor leading to the worsening of the Global Warming and the spreading of the “Lighters’ Effects”. If we can apply the theories of the photosynthesis in-between plants and animals into the Ocean(s), it may enable us to solve the problems. Noted that the Ocean(s) may not be relied on plantations but “micro-/marco-” living organism(s) under the “Oceanic Living Concept”. The definition(s) of the living things have been greatly widened by the “Theory of the Similarities of Lives”. Indeed, the “micro-/marco-” living organism(s) act like the “plantation(s)/vegetation(s)” on the continent(s)/in the Hydro-sphere and Litho-sphere. The process on the continent may not be equivalent to the one in the Ocean(s). They are not completely equal. The “micro-/marco-” living organism(s) is/are deposited in the Ocean(s) everywhere, but may not be on the Sea Bed as I have mentioned in the Oceanic Living Concept. There are two ways to explain this on-going process of gases exchanges. One is the living organism(s) on the Sea Bed which is not seemingly to be happened. Sunlight cannot reach that depth easily. Second is the “micro-/marco-” living organism(s) as I have mentioned. Under the inter-exchange concept of photosynthesis and the similar process which derived from the “Oceanic Living Concept”, we have a new breakthrough to study the Ocean in (a) more concrete and thorough way(s). If my hypotheses are valid, the ecosystem in the Ocean(s) can be solved by “improving/conducting experiment” on the continent(s). The time given to human is only twenty years under my speculations. The multiplying phenomenon bought by the “Lighters’ Effects” and the danger of the extinction(s) of “micro-/marco-” living organism(s) beneath the water may be resulted in a permanent destruction in our eco-system. Under the theory of the Similarities of Lives, all planets have the existence of the water component(s). The fluctuations of temperature are the key element deciding the survival of all living organism(s) and the form(s) of water/H2O/any component(s). The Orbit(s) of the planets is/are not decisive factor(s) of temperature fluctuations. The planet(s) nearby (e.g. Mars) show(s) symptom(s) of the existence of water as the NASA of the United States have published. The new concept I would like to bring forward in this article is the similarities in-between processes of photosynthesis and the one in the Ocean(s). These two concepts are inter-exchangeable. Scientific researches failed to find out the media(s) of the inter-exchange processes among gases/chemicals in the Ocean(s), but the phenomenon of the photosynthesis can be applied to the eco-system beneath water. Human only have twenty years under the “Lighters’ Effects” (It is not only a typical analyse but a simulation on our eco-system which must be correct.) and the “Oceanic Living Concept” [if it is applicable. It requires researches in a relatively long time or discovery of the existence(s) of such kind of media for the gases/chemical inter-exchanges.]. It may helps to cope with the adverse effects bought by the “Lighters’ Effects”.


----------------[Document 4]----------------

Theory of Temperature Variations
An Elaboration to the Theory of Similarities of Lives

BY Wong Ka Kit, Teru
Hong Kong, China
Published on 27 July 2009

The Theory of Similarities of Lives can be consolidated by a fact, “Light cannot burn. Temperature rises.”

Temperature varies inside a planet, but not in the outer space. The planet has its own system of temperature control because of its life cycles. Light cannot transmit heat, but air particles do. We named the life cycles inside a planet after “eco-system”. Light is necessary for plants, but not the transmitter of heat. Light will not burn.

Transformation of light is taken place under the process of photosynthesis to become the necessity of living organisms. Chemical components necessary for lives are already provided by the planets. A planet is a living thing. Light comes from the sun is the only element come from outside. The initial of the life cycle inside the planets is sunlight.

Temperature rises and decreases inside a planet as any other living things. It is a mechanism that can coordinate on its own.

I have no doubt that this theory is a BREAKTHORUGH in astronomy.
--------------

Welcome to Discussions.
 
Last edited:

kk23wong

New member
Below is a supplementary document.

----------------[Document 5]----------------

Infinity is a concept in Mathematics. Some may apply it into the universe. To prove the existences of God, I am hereby to post another foundings in mathematics to illustrate that the concept of infinity is invalid.

The solution is as follow:
Solution to “Infinity” in Mathematics

BY Wong Ka Kit, Teru
Hong Kong, China
Published on 14 July 2009

With regards to the question of “I(i)nfinity”, I am going to give all of you the final answer.
I am hereby to announce that "infinity" is no longer a myth.

Please be kindly reminded that the announcement of my explanation(s) to the mathematical term "infinity" is protected by Law(s) of your countries. With the will of the God, I am going to give all of you a new definition to all types of questions regarding to this term.

To begin with, I have to give brief description(s) to the term or word, "I(i)nfinity"

First, "Infinity"(and infinity) is a term or word meaning unlimited in English. It is a general agreement which has been recognized by dictionaries and the public.

Second, "Infinity"(and infinity) is a term or word which refers to "Zero" by referring to the equation-al explanation, "I(i)nfinity=Zero" or "I(i)nfinity=0".

Third, "Infinity"(and infinity) is a term which cannot be measured or being replaced by other number [excluding symbol(s)].

After presenting the definition(s) of the term or word "Infinity", I am going to give all of you a general idea of my concept. This concept has to be protected by law(s) of all countries which allow access to this web site(s), including all formats or URL(s). Thanks in advance.

"I(i)nfinity=Zero" and "I(i)nfinity=0" are mathematic equations recognized by US and all countries.

I(i)nfinity=0
0=I(i)nfinity
0=0

0=I(i)nfinity
[This equation refers to the number "Zero" is equal to the word/term "I(i)nfinity".]

I(i)nfinity=0
[This equation refers to the word/term "I(i)nfinity" is equal to the number "Zero".]

If I(i)nfinity = 0,
then 0=infinity.

Zero is only an expression of number [even some may refer it to the number of Zero (0)]. It can be marked on a linear (straight) line.

(<)-----(-2)-----(-1)-----(0)-----(1)-----(2)-----(>)

The above is a time line. The number (0)/Zero marked on this timeline refers to a digit only.
Please be reminded that the key of solving “I(i)nfinity” is the Timeline.

If I(i)nfinity=U(u)nlimited,
Then there will not be the number (0)/Zero marked on this timeline.

The arrow (<) on this timeline refers to other number(s) which is negative.
The arrow (>) on this timeline refers to other number(s) which is positive.

Please be noted that the number(s) in sequences adjacent with the directions of arrows [(<)/(>)].

In this case, Zero/(0)/0 [which refers to infinity by the equation of (0=infinity or infinity=0)] is only an expression of number.

Time is linear. "Zero/(0)/0" is only a mark/a dot/a number/an expression of a particular point in the timeline (structural-like line).

As a result, "Zero/(0)/0" is the number which can substitute the term/word "I(i)nfinity".

Ended.
------------

Welcome to all Discussions.
 
Last edited:

kk23wong

New member
Sorry. I am not pushing this post, but there is a supplementary document which supply my arguments on the planetary systems.

The differences in-between heat energy and light is a conceptual mistake made by scientists in human history. Nobody is capable of noticing it, but they try to link them up by inventing various methods to evaulate the question. My discovery to their differences will be a breakthrough to many scientific researches as well as our understanding of the universe.

A Scientific Discovery of the Differences in-between Heat Energy and Light
Light cannot carry heat energy. Light & Heat energy are not the same.

BY Wong Ka Kit, Teru
Hong Kong, China
Published on 4 August 2009

Light comes from the Sun in a solar system. Sun is in a high temperature during the process of generating the light. The temperature of the sun can be measured, but not for the light. “Light does not carry any heat energy. They are not the same.” This statement can be observed in the temperature of the Space. The Space is cold. It is a general belief of the scientists that light can transform into heat energy when reaching the Earth. Such belief is not established in a solid ground. Even though such kind of transformation processes can be carried out in the laboratories, it does not necessarily apply to the natural world. The situation is similar to turning on a light bulb. The light bulb generated light and heat by heating the wires. Both heat energy and light are generated, but they are not the same thing. The coverage of light generated by the light bulb does not vary correspondingly to the temperature around it. In another words, the transformation of light energy into heat energy does not exist. This discovery is derived from the conceptual mistake of sciences. It would be the greatest discovery throughout the 21st century and a subsidiary theory to my explanation of planetary systems in the universe.
--------------

Welcome to all Discussions.
 
Last edited:
Top