I might as well just officially disprove sandstone's "disproving" of my hypothesis (if you know what I mean lol). Her justification is baseless for two reasons:
1) She claimed that she used her chart. There are 2 things wrong with that: A) One example can't possibly disprove my hypotheses. You need quite a large sample to disprove it (and prove it, too).
- this is true.. no proof on your position has been provided in some conclusive manner and this is all i continue to point out while giving you a few examples where it didn't hold true as well.. So far, I'm seeing more examples that prove it rather than disprove it. what you see and what you share are 2 separate things..
talk is cheap which is primarily all i see from you.. And B) She never showed her chart, so how do we know that she really has that particular placement to begin with?
lol - for someone who was thru debating with me, you sure know how to make a fool of yourself in your shifting position.. (I hear the screams now: SHOW THE CHART! SHOW THE CHART!). I joke, of course
. This isn't Obama we're talking about...
2) The examples given previously (JFK, Rock Hudson, and Brad Pitt) by her are really poor examples to give. JFK's chart isn't even given in that link she gave. Also, ESPECIALLY for celebrities, how do you know that that's their real birth time? Brad Pitt's MIGHT be ok, since I don't see any shred of non-heterosexuality in his chart. But for Rock Hudson, I can practically guarantee that that's NOT his birth chart...at all. I would have to have actual, physical proof of his birth certificate in my hands or visible somewhere else.