Kaiousei no Senshi
Premium Member
So, this is kind of a combination relationship/relocation, but I felt like being crazy and posting in the relocation board, just for the fun of it.
So, here's the chart for the moment I asked the question. Checking to see if it's radical, the Ascendant is neither early nor late, and in fact it cooresponds to my natal Piscean Ascendant. The Lord of the Hour is Jupiter, who rules the Sign Ascending showing the chart is radical as well. The only thing is that weird is that Luna is VOC in her own Sign of Cancer and (perhaps someone more knowledgeable than I can correct me on this) I've read that Luna cannot be considered Void in the Signs of Cancer, Taurus, or Pisces; the Signs of the benefics.
So when I first looked at this chart it seemed to me that it was suggesting an undeniable yes. My boyfriend is signifed by Mercury as Virgo falls on the Seventh, and my house is also signified by Mercury as Gemini is on the Fourth cusp. Since my boyfriend and my home are the same planet, that suggests a strong connection. Not only that, but Mercury is also in the Fourth house, showing my boyfriend is literally to be in my home. Okay, that's great and all, but why do I not seem happier?
If I'm signified by Jupiter in Depression and retrograde, why am I so upset by this? My boyfriend in Gemini is detrimenting me, and I'm actually very upset by this. Jupiter is in my Eleventh house of dreams, and Jupiter here is said to bring about the fruition of such hopes. There is no aspect, reception, collection, or translation between Mercury and Jupiter, so I find that to be very strange. Taking myself as Luna we have the same problems, except I am significantly more dignified by domicile and term. Again, though, there is no reception, aspect, or translation of light. However, if we include the Outers (and I mostly do not) there is a collection of light by Uranus who has already acquired the light of Luna via a Trine and will soon acquire the light of Mercury through a Square. Since Uranus doesn't actually have any light, this is probably not applicable.
Flipping through Fixed Stars, I find none that are conjoined with important planets to be significant (in honesty, only Mercury is conjoined with Capella, but I didn't find that star's significance to be important to the question)
Sounds like a yes, but I'm going to regret it. Any other insights?
So, here's the chart for the moment I asked the question. Checking to see if it's radical, the Ascendant is neither early nor late, and in fact it cooresponds to my natal Piscean Ascendant. The Lord of the Hour is Jupiter, who rules the Sign Ascending showing the chart is radical as well. The only thing is that weird is that Luna is VOC in her own Sign of Cancer and (perhaps someone more knowledgeable than I can correct me on this) I've read that Luna cannot be considered Void in the Signs of Cancer, Taurus, or Pisces; the Signs of the benefics.
So when I first looked at this chart it seemed to me that it was suggesting an undeniable yes. My boyfriend is signifed by Mercury as Virgo falls on the Seventh, and my house is also signified by Mercury as Gemini is on the Fourth cusp. Since my boyfriend and my home are the same planet, that suggests a strong connection. Not only that, but Mercury is also in the Fourth house, showing my boyfriend is literally to be in my home. Okay, that's great and all, but why do I not seem happier?
If I'm signified by Jupiter in Depression and retrograde, why am I so upset by this? My boyfriend in Gemini is detrimenting me, and I'm actually very upset by this. Jupiter is in my Eleventh house of dreams, and Jupiter here is said to bring about the fruition of such hopes. There is no aspect, reception, collection, or translation between Mercury and Jupiter, so I find that to be very strange. Taking myself as Luna we have the same problems, except I am significantly more dignified by domicile and term. Again, though, there is no reception, aspect, or translation of light. However, if we include the Outers (and I mostly do not) there is a collection of light by Uranus who has already acquired the light of Luna via a Trine and will soon acquire the light of Mercury through a Square. Since Uranus doesn't actually have any light, this is probably not applicable.
Flipping through Fixed Stars, I find none that are conjoined with important planets to be significant (in honesty, only Mercury is conjoined with Capella, but I didn't find that star's significance to be important to the question)
Sounds like a yes, but I'm going to regret it. Any other insights?