911 was an inside job and so was...

Phoenix Venus

Well-known member
This is a MUST WATCH!


I'm sure you all have heard the news about the House Stenographer ranting about "masons" and "serving two masters"


Wasn't It odd? It was obviously a "dub-over" because you could still hear the woman after she stepped away from the mic.


Watch the video analysis on the link below.


What Really Happened When the House Stenographer Was Pulled off the Floor?

http://beforeitsnews.com/u-s-politics/2013/10/what-really-happened-when-the-house-stenographer-was-pulled-off-the-floor-video-2449772.html
 

rahu

Banned
yes that was quite interesting in that ghe news print and internet altered the video to make the her say things before congress that she had said in anothe part of the building and didn't report what she really said brfore congress

strange times are upon us

rahu
 

Phoenix Venus

Well-known member
Yeah.. they have footage of when she really said that... she was standing next to an elevator..... you can hear the elevator ding as she speaks... in that crowd inside the congressional meeting the camera never would have picked that noise up...

major BELLS going off...

IT definitely makes you wonder.... what was actually said up there.

strange times, indeed. ;)

Maybe a smiley does not seem appropriate but i cannot help but joy in the fact that we are on the brink of getting OUT of this strange mess and into a more peaceful existence. It might take some more time yet but its coming...
 
Last edited:

Jesse Booth

Well-known member
I highly doubt that our government was responsible for 911, as a few people have been saying, though the Boston bombing might have been their doing. With 911, the places attacked were simply too important. If our government were trying to make Americans accept a war with the Middle East for economic reasons(oil), they would've picked less critical places to attack than the center of all trade in the western world, the most important military intelligence facility we have, and the President's home. I don't know enough about the various theories on the Boston bombing theories to comment.
 

Jesse Booth

Well-known member
Oh right, I forgot. You cannot possibly get into a building with public access that exists for the sole purpose of commerce without the central government acting behind the scenes.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/20/us/new-york-world-trade-center-intruder/

If a sixteen year old kid with an obvious lack of judgement can just walk around the WTC in the middle of the night after 911, the security before 911 must have been virtually nonexistent! It wouldn't have been difficult for a few people to plant explosive charges inside the towers in case the pilots failed. And again, if the government were behind this, they probably would've attacked less critical points in our nation that would still cause the desired public outrage. Points such as, for example, a nuclear power plant, the St. Louis Arch, or anywhere but the offices of everyone who would benefit from the ensuing war(for example, the President, the people working at the Pentagon, influential businessmen vying for access to oil against OPEC). And if the attack was launched by the govt. to instigate a war over resources, we would've made at least part of the Middle East into territories. Simple, really.

The US government being involved in the terrorist attacks on 911 is illogical. Every shred of evidence I have seen so far shows that there was undoubtably someone inside the WTC. I never suggested that I disagree with that point. HOWEVER it is highly unlikely that our own government was responsible for the attack. I don't say this out of trust for our government - I wouldn't put something like this past them - but out of a basic understanding of survival instinct. The targets were too vital for us to risk; if an attack were to go too well, we've destroyed our own chain of command, economy, and military intelligence center. And a terrorist organization wouldn't need our asistance; bureacracy and sheer incompetence did the work for them.

To summarize, Al Qaeda had no need for the US government to be complicit in their plans, the security was already at a level far below what would be needed to prevent the attack, and the government, although it is concievable that they had a motive for such actions, the targets hit and the actions of the government following the attack don't fit the motive, or any motive.
 

Phoenix Venus

Well-known member
Catchy tune, that you won't hear on the radio or tv.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzLfHQRfcbY

Hey, heres a couple videos about what we were talking about:

Sandy hook in the dark knight rises:

https://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=SUYgG3g8N2g

Another shorter version:

https://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=whu4R6k4_Zs


Cartoons predict 9-11:

https://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=vfCFxRAWyQs


Family guy predicts boston maraton bombing:

https://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=CmqqiVlT06M
 

venuschild

Banned
The whistle blower perishes!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Ruppert

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OM6sdbVMYjE&list=PLDwWJF8gtwIg9I1jT-aoiq6Sg0Qce1r12

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQR2z4YCzDw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3KrVrNdZQ4

http://www.globalresearch.ca/911-tr...michael-ruppert-committed-suicide-why/5378861

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kW5qiuLb8jY

http://doubtfulnews.com/2014/04/911-truther-ruppert-dead/

The following video makes no sense to me as Mike Rupert was a Whistle Blower yet it's being played up he was broke financially!

Since he was a former L.A. detective wouldn't he have been drawing $30 K to $60K a year when a policeman?

And his Social Security had to be around $2000 per month!

How could he be broke?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydNqFyvisCo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XC97OmCHCCM

If this is true then I guess Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone!
 

rahu

Banned
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/08/high-ranking-u-s-officials-sold-weapons-grade-nuclear-cores-to-foreign-powers-generating-billions-to-rig-u-s-elections-3019402.html?utm_content=beforeit39snews-verticalresponse&utm_campaign=&utm_medium=verticalresponse&utm_source=direct-b4in.info&utm_term=http%3A%2F%2Fb4in.info%2FrfNi
\ hundreds of weapons-grade nuclear “pits” (the weapon’s core) were stolen from the US by high ranking government officials and handed out “like candy bars” as bribes, for making terror weapons and generating billions in revenue used to rig American elections.

They also make up Israel’s entire nuclear arsenal.[/I]
From a White House and Pentagon aide on the staff of Paul Wolfowitz:[/B]

[“Once the Israelis got the nuclear pits they double crossed us. No one ever thought that they would be so ruthless to do what they did in using them to destroy the World Trade Center on 9/11.

“The problem is the chemical finger print of left over PU-239 fallout
proves that it was made in the USA at Hanford. You can’t hide this. A
simple chemical mass spectrometry test will reveal it. That’s the problem. Half of Washington has known for a decade that 9/11 was an ‘inside job’ done with stolen American weapons”

rahu
 
Last edited:

rahu

Banned
http://www.prisonplanet.com/us-refu...about-foreign-involvement-in-911-attacks.html

The Obama administration refuses to declassify the information about the involvement of certain foreign governments in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, despite the calls and efforts of the Congress members, congressman Stephen Lynch told RIA Novosti on Tuesday.

H. Res. 428 is a resolution introduced to make public 28 pages of the Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 2001.

...........declassification of the pages is necessary to provide the American public with the full truth surrounding the tragic events of September 11, 2001, particularly relating to the involvement of foreign governments

so what is the government afraid of?

rahu
 
Top