david starling
Well-known member
Is Mundane-astrology exclusively focused on the Natal-charts of individuals who affect world events, or on the overall Astrological conditions that correspond to, and predict the nature and outcome of those events? I would have thought it was the latter, but a great deal of attention has been devoted to specific characteristics of the Natal-charts of the two major-Party candidates in this Mundane forum.
Also, is Mundane-astrology considered Traditional, which would rule out using the outer-three major, Modern planets? Notice how often it's stated that Pluto entering Capricorn correlated to world-wide economic problems. I could point to Neptune entering Leo at the start of WWI, including the trigger which involved royalty. And having entered Aries at the start of the Civil War, a war of unification, etc. But, if it's Traditional, such correlations would technically be out of place in this forum.
Also, is Mundane-astrology considered Traditional, which would rule out using the outer-three major, Modern planets? Notice how often it's stated that Pluto entering Capricorn correlated to world-wide economic problems. I could point to Neptune entering Leo at the start of WWI, including the trigger which involved royalty. And having entered Aries at the start of the Civil War, a war of unification, etc. But, if it's Traditional, such correlations would technically be out of place in this forum.
Last edited: