Who says that I want "bad" things to happen to the Clintons. Another nonsensical assumption of yours ! Both of the Clintons are simply unsuited, AND unqualified, to be the President !
This is what you actually wrote:
I have no hidden agenda with the Clintons. They are scum.
Let's be clear: we all show pre-conceived biases and favoritism, in interpreting the natal charts of these famous and infamous politicians. So do PH D psychologists that I have worked with who happen to be trained in western astrology.
Everyone has a bias and that inevitably seeps into the final interpretation.
No problem with that, except that you called the Clintons
scum.
These aren't the words of professional psychologists that I've known. You further believe alt-right unproven allegations about the Clintons, rather than fact-checking with more objective sources.
"The Clintons" are not running for president. Hillary Clinton is running for president.
You are big on bravado and opinions, my fine feathered friend, and short on predictions. So, who will win the election on November 8th or on December 21st. (good grief?)
Put your money where your mouth is !
Tell us why, in clear astrological terms, as well, as this is a mundane section and not a political gossip section (as you stated).
Nobody is your "fine feathered friend." Save that expression for your pet budgie, as I dismiss personal put-down attempts. I haven't seen any of your astrological analysis lately.
I have spread my mundane comments out across several threads, and I do not expect you to have read all of them.
But one argument that hits me strongly is that if someone (a) becomes POTUS or (b) becomes an ex-presidential nominee overnight, then this should show up in her/his MC or 11th house using prognosticative methods. Wouldn't you think?
Moreover, Uranus rules sudden change. Astrologer Alice Portman has observed that the timing of Uranus changing houses should correspond to changing life events.
You've correctly noted that we don't have a solid birth time for Clinton, but I've looked at her 8:02 am charts and think they have merit. If we go with that TOB during the period between Election Day and Inauguration Day, solar arc Uranus partile conjuncts her MC or moves beyond it into her 10th house. Donald Trump's TOB is Rodden AA, and during the same period his solar arc Uranus squares his MC.
Solar arc asteroid Hillary conjuncts the "natal" 10th house moon of the Constitution of the US. This is the document, not the Declaration of Independence, that I believe should constitute the "birth" of the US presidency.
It's OK to dismiss solar arcs or asteroids as you have done, but then when you get enough of these direct hits, you start to take them seriously.
Maybe you'd prefer traditional astrology's use of the Aries ingress chart for 2016, which shows the party in power (Democrats) retaining control.
http://www.ninagryphon.com/astrology-of-the-2016-presidential-election/
The astrologer to watch, incidentally, is Unique_Astrology, who uses far more sophisticated predictive methods than I do. He has several posts on this thread. I'd be curious to know what you think of his work.