Well explanation about Asc VIA COMBUSTA.There are situations under which, examptions are made.Not still discovered, absolutely.For instance team with less ACC dig is at the same time placed at the house with sign or Lord of that house which are VIA COMBUSTA.That means ACC dig(the situation is bad) are even worse (VIA COMBUSTA).Completly destined to lose.
VIA COMBUSTA is not COMBUSTED it is by mystake defined as VIA COMBUSTA.
If you read the history, the explanation of that situation is like you pass through the period (THE TIME not the Distance) during you will feel extremly weak.How much weak?Very.I do not like that answer, it must be in points.4 points.That is the situation little bit better than combusted planet by the SUN.Well if you want more I think I explained in my earlier writings at this thread.
If ASC VIA COMBUSTA or DSC VIA COMBUSTA with change of sign bondaries, are combined that means that things will change or NOT.This can make a little bit confusion but in the next sentences I will make it clear.ASC and DSC represents houses, than teams which are using those houses only according to their quantity of light.If ASC or DSC is near sign bondary that means the
situation will change in a TIME. This means that teames one placed at any of the sides will not stay there forever if the sign at ASC and DSC changes the teams placement changes even during the game.One made placement at the beginning is not forever.It changes according to the house sign changes.
Simple NOTHING LASTS FOREVER. Now you must change the team placement if the sign changes.At that moment you count the new situation and you get new values.It is so helpful than you can predict even an overcome of the soccer match.
There are situtions when teams do not change positions when the ASC and DSC changes the sign, of course.Let say easier, when new sign represents the same color or if you want more scientificly when the same quantity of light stands on the sides.
If you need from me to be more deatiled in some explanations, ASK.
Try to think about the astrology with a great respect to the ancients but with the greater faith that we go further more.
I do not agree with Frawley's explanation ( How should I) that in the past many famous works are done and that we did not evaluate in mind.Of course we did.He mentioned Sheakspare's work but I may just say,With the full respect to the alters we go further according to the rule EVERYTHING CHANGES ON THE HIGHER LEVEL.
B.b.G.