Love2Know
Well-known member
Interesting! Nice call! My sun is in Gemini. I think it's because of my small bones. Celtic blood or something . . . thanks mom.
Yeah so I would say scorp rising gemini sun then makes sense for ur look
Interesting! Nice call! My sun is in Gemini. I think it's because of my small bones. Celtic blood or something . . . thanks mom.
ouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu now describe leo rising plzzz
Leo rising has a rectangular or squarish head.
Honor, integrity, courage, directness and honesty are the values of the balanced Leo rising person. The energy is that of one that wants to be recognized or dealt with. They can have a crude and loud approach (unless the humility of water or earth factors intervene) or a royal bearing, but they won't be ignored. The voice can be very appealing if soft or commanding if louder. Many are capable of great volumes that resonate from the chest, thus there are many actors and singers with this Ascendant sign.
The eyes are often large or bulging, but can be especially attractive and magnetic.
The eyes are more often widely-spaced than with any other sign. There can be a barrel chest with men and large bust with many of the women, but whatever the details, there is a strong, commanding presence or a statuesque look about them, whether slender or bulky.
The frame is often large and the body sturdy, even blocky, but some are taller and more athletic. Some are swaybacked as if pushing out the chest with pride. With many there is an emphasis on upper body while the legs are skinny and knees knobby. They know they can be somebody, but some may stretch too hard in their ambition. They are natural leaders that radiate vitality and magnanimity.
I wonder if judging one's physical appearance is a way of validating whether one's time of birth is accurate. I apparently have almost none of the Scorpio rising traits and nearly all of the Libra rising traits, as stated in the beginning of this post. I came to this conclusion years ago as other descriptions in various media seem to support this belief.
Your face doesn't have this rawness that I attribute to Scorps, unless there's things in the chart to offset it. That being said you still use a Scorpio Asc time for your natal.I wonder if judging one's physical appearance is a way of validating whether one's time of birth is accurate. I apparently have almost none of the Scorpio rising traits and nearly all of the Libra rising traits, as stated in the beginning of this post. I came to this conclusion years ago as other descriptions in various media seem to support this belief.
There might be a delay in the recording of people's birth time at the hospital. If this is so, then it's possible that many will never know their actual time of birth.
Check the signs immediately preceding or following your current ascendant. These might be an "ah ha" moment for many.
Why don't Germans smile?I was *definitely* born at the time recorded - my father made a point of looking at his watch and double checking it with the hospital clock. 11 degrees sag rising - and yet anyone with any interest in astrology pegs me for a scorp rising. My personality is much more compatible with sag rising, I laugh tons, I'm just not particularly smiley (but my mother's german, so I can't help that).
Even Kannon told me I was definitely scorp rising, and while I respect his work I know for me personally that just isn't the case.
You're the one who wants to touch him even though you barely know him.I want to touch Orlando bloom sensually, but I would feel dirty after. He seems like a sexual douche.
Also, I would like to let the record show that I still believe you are a scorp rising oppose to Libra. Also, I am right. I am always right. Jk but not really.
I think it could be reliable, if we knew what we were looking for.
I've been collecting images and data and organizing them according to their sidereal rising signs for a while now.
I believe that the rising sign does impart a kind of physical character. I also believe that the particular placement of the ascendant ruler also gives rise to a particular look.
My notion is that you have a kind of major type (sign rising), and then a sub type (rising sign ruler condition), and both modified by aspects, probably... something I need a lot more data to check out properly.
I'm sure someone could do this stuff with a lot more efficiency.
Here's a section from sidereal Pisces rising;
Couldn't this similarity be equally attributed to them all being of European ancestry (possibly all of them being of Western European ancestry?), thus their facial structure would have a number of similarities? How does this sidereal Pisces Rising play out when you include people from African or Asian backgrounds who have that rising sign? Does it still hold up? It can't be considered a universal Pisces Rising trait unless it hold up across the racial board.
I think it could be reliable, if we knew what we were looking for.
I believe that the rising sign does impart a kind of physical character. I also believe that the particular placement of the ascendant ruler also gives rise to a particular look.
My notion is that you have a kind of major type (sign rising), and then a sub type (rising sign ruler condition), and both modified by aspects, probably... something I need a lot more data to check out properly.
I'm sure someone could do this stuff with a lot more efficiency.
I think it could be reliable, if we knew what we were looking for.
I've been collecting images and data and organizing them according to their sidereal rising signs for a while now.
I believe that the rising sign does impart a kind of physical character. I also believe that the particular placement of the ascendant ruler also gives rise to a particular look.
My notion is that you have a kind of major type (sign rising), and then a sub type (rising sign ruler condition), and both modified by aspects, probably... something I need a lot more data to check out properly.
I'm sure someone could do this stuff with a lot more efficiency.
Here's a section from sidereal Pisces rising;
A few not entirely caucasian sidereal Pisces risers:
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Carter,_Ron
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Yo_Yo_Ma
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Kashkari,_Neel
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Armstrong,_Louis
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Sutton,_Komilla
I don't know, the problem is that there are too many possibilities...
Have you seen this site? http://www.astrofaces.com/astrofaces/index.html
I found the link somewhere in this forum but I dont remember where. It may even be in this topic. It's interesting, exactly about astrology & appearance.
You're the one who wants to touch him even though you barely know him.
I'd argue that Armstrong & Sutton don't, but that could be weight issues throwing things off. A longish-looking face might've been more apparent in their youth, before the weight gain. However, Armstrong does have the bulging eyes that Kannon mentioned at the beginning of this thread as a Pisces Rising trademark. For the most part, the Pisces Rising theory is holding up across race.
Thanks I did those on an i pad.. Well the description is semi true I have huge legs though. The personality part rings a bell but I am also described as appear calm and laid back then bam I can burst out fast and be very present I guess. I do not like to be pushed around! Ummm eyes spaced apart wide hmm Yeah I guess I do not sing well... thnx