Hello Branislav, you wrote:
Hello Starlink,
With full respect for the thread 'JF is stand up philosopher'
I have not seen this thread! But I will look at it after I finish this post
Personally I like the way JF writes, as you also said, it is often funny.
But, as you also do, I do not follow his writings 100% as I also disagree with some of his writings.
I have book from Anthony Louis which I like very much as well, Derek Appleby, Karen Hamaker-Zondag and the great William Lilly.
I take from these books what makes sense to me. I dont even agree with all that Lilly wrote to be honest. Things like taking a Mutual Reception as " a thing that is brought to pass and that without any great trouble, and suddenly to the content of both parties" even is the signifiers make no contact to one another or are making contact by square and opposition.
I have seen much the contrary. Only when MR's are made between strong planets in strong houses, could this be the case, but otherwise.... I doubt it.
Karen Hamaker says that when the Asc. ruler is the same as the quisited, then the answer is YES. This is also not always the case.
Antony Louis uses inconjuncts and minor aspects, as does Appleby. JF does not. I use intercepted houses and rulers of those houses, JF says that that is neglectable. I disagree.
I actually dont know why you are writing this to
me because I have not mentioned JF in this thread. I only have one book of his, " The horary textbook".
I will have a look at that thread now.
Cheers, Starlink