French Open and Wimbledon Prediction

[PumpkinPie]

French Open = Nadal (as expected)
Wimbledon = Djokovic (not expected)

It looks as if NEITHER of the 3 will win the US OPEN.

I hope that I am WRONG and that Federer wins both but I am boldly making my first predictions. :eek:

[fensi88]

What Are Your Astrology Reasons For This Predictions?

[PumpkinPie]

Since I am "perfecting" my technique I will not reveal at this time what the astrolgical indicators are (it is based on astrology) because I need to be assured that they are consistent AND replicable.

For now we just need to watch and see IF I am correct and then I will reveal the indicators. I posted so that this was not a scenario where I show some information after the fact to show something that has already happened. "PRE"DICTION means that I said so BEFORE. Now to prove my method right or wrong is the task.

PS Federer WILL make it to the final of the French Open but will fall to Nadal once there.

I didn't check to see how far he would get in Wimbledon or the US Open I just checked for the win which was NOT indicated with the method that I use. I love (not romantic) Federer so I am actually hoping that I am NOT correct.

Wish me luck or not for now.:)

If you get me correct information on the Ladies (many have incorrect/missing time) I will do theirs also. In addition, I am doubtful that Djokovic's time is actually correct. Though I think that the 10:45 time is NOT correct I was able to find a consistency in his chart using that time that has successfully "showed" him the winner. I could possibly attempt to rectify his chart based on my belief of how the time is off, but I honestly don't have that kind of time right now, plus the 10:45 time appears to show me a form of what I am looking for so I will just go with that for now.

If I am correct I can't wait to do some brackets. I have always avoided doing them but would now be able to do so with confidence.

[fensi88]

On Djokovic's official site I post thread "Novak's time of birth" few months ago and one member post that his birth time is 3:50am. Member said that his father knows Djokovic's father, so I guess this is right time. I also come to conclusion that 10:45 is not working for him, so glad to see there is more who thinks the same.

[PumpkinPie]

Thanks a bunch. I will try the 3:50 am time and should immediately know if it is correct.

Also, based on the 12:00 pm birth time for the ladies I have Jankovic as the French Open winner. I have smaller "faith" in this because the times are 12:00 pm and I know that they aren't accurate. But on a very weak limb I will pick her.

Update: The 3:50 am time gives me EXACTLY the Astrological Indicators that I was looking for! You appear to have done a great job on getting your information.

Thanks

[fensi88]

Unfortunately for Serbian ladies I have no time of birth...

[PumpkinPie]

Yeah I know, but using the 12:00 time I look at who was most promising. Which kind of works. I say kinda because that is how I knew that the 10:45 time for Djokovic was wrong but I was still able to "see" that he would not win the French but would win Wimbledon. The indicator changes but is consistent for that person.

By doing some follow-up I could try with the Ladies what I tried with Djokovic BUT for now based on inaccurate times Jankovic actually has the exact things that I look for, so I will have to see. If so in the future I would be able to "predict" a win for her based on that or I would have to attempt to rectify until I find what I am looking for.

Out of a whole day the odds are pretty low that I would see exactly what I was looking for and she actually wins (if she does) and there is nothing to it. 5 days and we will know part of the story.

If my technique (with accurate information) works I would feel VERY sad and hopeless because it would mean that we are fated after all. :(

[fensi88]

Update: The 3:50 am time give me EXACTLY the Astrological Indicators that I was looking for! You appear to have done a great job on getting your information.

Fine, glad to get confirmation of this data, thank you!

[PumpkinPie]

Though Jankovic lost I was able to "Prioritize" what I see in a chart. I did see a form of winner in Ivanovic's chart but I thought that it was the weaker indicator but it was the stronger. Safina's win was show clearly and I wish that I had posted, but this is about gaining information not knowing it all just yet.

I now feel comfortable enough to "pre"dict wins for the whole of Wimbledon, match by match. I will post only a couple of minutes before the start of the match even with inaccurate birth times. I also now know that if I see 2 competing win indicators it will be a "difficult" match but should still be able to "pre"dict the winner.

PS my pick of Djokovic still stands. As with anything I could be wrong but now I think that I am ready.

After Wimbledon and then the Accurate presentation of the US OPEN as already stated I could be able to share my astrological information.

See ya daily during Wimbledon.

[fensi88]

OK, do you perhaps have time of birth for F.Gonzalez?

[fensi88]

In tomoroow's match Djokovic vs Nadal, Moon is VOC (nothing new will happen), so Nadal will win in my opinion.

[fensi88]

Excuse me, Djokovic birth time is 2:49am!!(Me rx works!)I just went to forum and check out that post!!

[hermetic]

wow, this sounds very interesting, I would like to hear how can you predict these things? what do you look for, transitsfor the time of event, both natals? and what is the most important thing to look for? I'll wait until after Wimbledon for this explanation, no probs...


In tomoroow's match Djokovic vs Nadal, Moon is VOC (nothing new will happen), so Nadal will win in my opinion


ali mi Srbi ne bismo bas bili preterano zadovoljni... ;) zato se nadam da nisi u pravu


If my technique (with accurate information) works I would feel VERY sad and hopeless because it would mean that we are fated after all. :(


this is where astrology becomes a bit creepy, no? those rectifications by important life events always make me wonder - so, there was actually no possibility of it happening differently? and I get scared a bit.

[PumpkinPie]

I have already predicted Nadal the winner of the French Open. That stands. I was already comfortable with what I have to say about Djokovic. I felt decent about my prediction with the 10:45 am time but the 3:25 time gave me EXACTLY what I was looking for so I am comfortable with that.

I will not be seeking anymore "exact times" but if I run across them I will use them.

The Jankovic/Ivanovic match (which I had already stated I had doubts about) clarified which choice to make when there are competing indicators, so I am good. I am going for 100% accuracy and if I see a potential problem I will indicate it when I post who I feel the winner is going to be. Also, since I now know that Ivanovic's indicators are stronger I will say without reservations that after looking at both charts she will win, even without exact times.



Also if you love Federer (like me) have no fear. He is considered a "PRODIGY" and is likely to experience MUCH more success. My goal is to be able to say when! I think I got it, just trying to make sure that I have it.

Yes, to see things in charts like this is soooooooooooo scary. That is why I tread lightly and try to keep my inquisitions on the positive. That is why I will post only shortly before the match, plus I will need to see the draws and examine the charts.

Also, I will personally see who will win the US OPEN but I won't post it or go match by match. Particularly if Wimbledon pans out for me. I have already seen that it won't be Federer, Nadal, or Djokovic but that is all I plan on saying about that one because the speculation potential is so huge.

[fensi88]

wow, this sounds very interesting, I would like to hear how can you predict these things? what do you look for, transitsfor the time of event, both natals? and what is the most important thing to look for? I'll wait until after Wimbledon for this explanation, no probs...

Quote:

In tomoroow's match Djokovic vs Nadal, Moon is VOC (nothing new will happen), so Nadal will win in my opinion


ali mi Srbi ne bismo bas bili preterano zadovoljni... ;) zato se nadam da nisi u pravu
This my prediction was upon horary astrology. In event chart for this match we get VOC Moon and that means eighter draw or favorite wins. Because it can not be draw that means favorite, Nadal, will win. Yes, we from Serbia would not like to be as I predicit.

If you are interested to predicting winner of some sport contest by horary astrology, go to this site to see explanations how:
http://www.geocities.com/astrosport88/engleski.html

[fensi88]

In tomoroow's match Djokovic vs Nadal, Moon is VOC (nothing new will happen), so Nadal will win in my opinion.

As you can see, horary works perfectly!

BBC SPORT:"Rafael Nadal reached his fourth straight French Open final as he swept aside Novak Djokovic 6-4 6-2 7-6 (7-3)."

[PumpkinPie]

I engage astrology but NOT horary, but I will have to check that out.;)

[fensi88]

In today's final match Federer vs Nadal, Moon was VOC again, same story-Nadal win 3:0!!(as you predictied!)

[barty]

Pumpkin Pie, I wonder if there were any indications in your predictions of the manner of Nadal's victory yesterday?

I'm sure that, even though Nadal might have been thought of as the favourite on his preferred clay court surface, few would have expected Federer to suffer such a crushing defeat.

[PumpkinPie]

Pumpkin Pie, I wonder if there were any indications in your predictions of the manner of Nadal's victory yesterday?

I'm sure that, even though Nadal might have been thought of as the favourite on his preferred clay court surface, few would have expected Federer to suffer such a crushing defeat.

Yes, yesterday (06/15/08) Nadal was indicated as the winner. :D I am really NOT a Nadal fan so I didn't post or care. But I promise you that the same thing that told me that he would win the French told me that he would win yesterday.

I am still shocked at the accuracy, but still feeling it out as well. With Nadal, Federer, and Djokovic It is easier to "KNOW" 100% because I have accurate birth data, with others it is less easy IF there are competing indicators but most of the time the indicators will be totally absent for the loser thereby making it easier to be certain even without accurate data.

As for the french open it was indicated that there would be an easy win (probably straight sets) but exactly how easy is something that I may be able to pickup with more time. If it will be "difficult" both players have indicators but "different" indicators. Roger had "none" so I am not exactly surprised.

But trying out a new coach, battling back from illness, being a "mental" person tells you just from observing life that Federer has some "adjusting" to do, I just want him back to normal. Federer is a thinker and sometimes thinking can be paralyzing. I suspect that it is the reason, but how this is indicated astrologically has shaken me to the core.

[PumpkinPie]

A few 06/23/08 predictions. It was my original intent to do them all however since this is the first round many of the qualifiers don't have birth data.

Predicted winner listed

Hrbaty
Ivanovic
Baghdatis
Kunetsova

I have no information on Djokovic's competitor and as such can't predict with certainty, but if he wins I don't think that it will be in straight sets, possibly a scare and then he would go on to win:34:

Will try to do more. I hope Roger can pull this one off but it isn't what I see. :eek:

06/24/08

Well Roger defied fate or I have found the most powerful indicators of all in his chart from yesterday. I can't be sure until he plays a "non friend". I REALLY hope that is is the later.

Nadal will have an excellent performance on the 24 & 26 but I clearly see more difficulty as time goes on. NOT 5 setters initially after that period but maybe tighter sets. Will be interesting to see his opponents chart in the second week.
V. Williams looks ok for today and I could see her in the final. If so, it will be a difficult final the victor determined after I find out who she will play. I don't think that it will be Serena this time though.
Davenport has some of the newer (I hope) indicators so I will pick her without accurate Birth Time.
Fabrice has a familiar winning indicator, but Murray has a possible better one. I would NOT be shocked if Santoro won but I would not bet on it until I see what Murray's indicators means for him. This is without exact birth times.

Honestly, I could probably do a bit better but with the draw big and the data scarce I will wait until it gets smaller and I won't have to do so much work.

It will be more as time goes on, but so

[barty]

What happened to Djokovic then!!!

[barty]

Andy Murray - 15 May 1987, 14:10BST, Glasgow, Scotland, UK

[PumpkinPie]

What happened to Djokovic then!!!
I messed up his information for the end of Wimbledon. I did discovered this as soon as Wimbledon started but I was already wrong and decided to stay so since his fans were here. I tried to warn you a little but since you were warned that I was testing I was ok with it. I decided NOT to post for the past 2 days because of upsets that had speculation potential. In addition, Roger has shown me potentially a "royal flush" of indicators which makes me VERY HAPPY as you know he is my dude. ;)

I have NOT turned away from this but am working on ranking the indicators just as you do the hands in poker.

My picks for 06/27/08 are as follows:

Federer
Williams
Zheng
Safin
Ferrer (I kinda like Ancic but chose Ferrer because he had fewer "changes in his indicators)
Bolelli
Kunetzova
Berdych (Verdasco had consistency but a potentially very good indicator popped up of Berdych so I will go with him)
Baghdatis

I don't expect for Nadal to make it into the 2nd week if past the next round as stated above. I will cross that actual bridge when I get to it.

Toodles :)

[fensi88]

If you cast the horary event chart for the start of Wimbledon 2008 (23 june 2008, 12h gmt+1) you will get Moon VOC. That means, nothing new, favorite wins this year, i.e. Federer and V.Williams.

[barty]

fensi, that would depend on who you think is the favourite though wouldn't it?!!!!

Many Nadal fans would insist he is the favourite, after their man took Federer apart at the French Open and won the Artois title on grass.

And since the retirement of Henin, there is no clear favourite for the ladies singles. The world No.1 Ivanovic only just scraped through her last round and Sharapova went out yesterday!

[fensi88]

fensi, that would depend on who you think is the favourite though wouldn't it?!!!!
In my opinion, no.
Past years winners tell us who is favorite.
If you look some years back for winners in Wimbledon you will see:
2003 Roger Federer
2004 Roger Federer
2005 Roger Federer
2006 Roger Federer
2007 Roger Federer

Where is Nadal here? Nadal is favorite in Rolan Garos not in Wimbledon.

If you look girls we see:

2000 Venus Williams
2001 Venus Williams
2002 Serena Williams
2003 Serena Williams
2004 Maria Sharapova
2005 Venus Williams
2006 Amelie Mauresmo
2007 Venus Williams

More winners has V.Wiliams, so she is favorite.

[barty]

You must take into account recent form, though, surely?

Marian Bartoli of France reached the Wimbledon final last year and was thus seeded 11 this time. She suffered a loss of form after reaching the final and lost to unseeded Bethanie Mattek this year in straight sets. Williams' win eight years ago does not affect her current form and chance of winning this year!

[PumpkinPie]

06/30/08

Federer
V Williams
Gasquet
Szavay (Zheng has no change from her win the other day, the problem is that Szvay has very little change AND a form of the possible BEST so far indicator. I say possible because without exact time the true nature of the indicator can't be determined.)
Chakvetadze (Petrova lost many of her winning indicators but gained a from of the possible BEST so far indicator. Since I know that Chak has won with what she has and I don't know what the means for Petrova I will pick her.
Verdasco
S Williams (Serena AND Nadal have fading indicators. She had 2 one has left but because they have that "fight" persona it is likely enough. The problem for both is that ALL indicators are gone before the semifinals if I remember correctly.)
Nadal (Down to 2 Indicators from 4. All indicators fade in a few days. Youznay has a good indicator and if he won I wouldn't be shocked but Nadal still apparently has a little longer.)
Tipsarevic (Seems like this will be a long match the edge goes to this one)
Kuznetsova
Safin (Both of these players lost indicators and Wawrinka gained a good one with actual birth data. The problem is that Safin had a form of the BEST and since I don't have is actual birth time I can't know that is the BEST.
Petrova (Kudryavtseva had some losses BUT a form of the BEST indicator is still present a win and can't tell if that is the catalyst because of her losses.
Dementiavia (Neither of these players has ANY changes to their indicators so favor goes to the better performer when they last won).


I expect a lot of fighting today but not really any shockers.

I had to go to the JC Penney Salon sale on Saturday so I didn't really get to "predict" or watch.

I didn't predict for Jankovic because I still don't see her on my schedule of play. :O

[barty]

Using the same technique as I tried with the Euro 2008 results (cross aspects between the country's chart and a chart set for match kick-off) I have compared the charts of Federer and Nadal with a chart set for 2pm Wimbledon this afternoon.

Federer's cross-aspects look nicer.

But of course if a rain delay means the match starts later, things could change.

[fensi88]

What a surprise!!
"Rafael Nadal held off an incredible fightback from Roger Federer to win his first Wimbledon title and end the Swiss star's reign at the All England Club."
I do not have explanation how Moon VOC in opening chart foir this year Wimbledon works for Venus and do not works for Federer?!!

[James1]

Interesting to see that it turned out right for Venus Williams but not for Federer.

Will any of you predict for the US Open?

I'd love to read your predictions if you do :)

My favorite player on the women's side is Venus Williams, so I'd be interested to see what some of you think how the US Open will pan out for her.:D

[fensi88]

Interesting to see that it turned out right for Venus Williams but not for Federer.
When I look at that chart, Moon was VOC but in AQ!! When ever Moon is in Aq you may expect some sort of surprise (ruler is Ur, unpredictable), so I ask my self how it is possible, nothing new and Moon in Aq? Next time I will take that fact about Moon in Aq when I do predicting, ie. some little shift among favorites.

[fensi88]

If you are Venus Williams fan and really want to know how she will do on US Open the easies way is to ask horary question for wxample "will VV be winner of this US Open", insert the chart for moment you ask question, and someone who will be inspired with it will post answer.