Michael
08-12-2007, 09:52 PM
I was meditating on the deadly blow
the copernican revolution did on astrology.
Although it's true that geocentric astrology
is as valid as ever, astrology as a field of
study is old fashioned due to it's geocentric
worldview. I found this:
http://www.heliocentric-astrology.com/
I think the only way astrology can evolve is
making the jump to heliocentrism. A major
change would be needed to make it appealing
to a new generation of individuals and astrologers.
The only problem is that all books would have to be
rewritten and astrologers would have to study
the new model. All this seems difficult to happen
in the near term.
And what if besides doing this change, we also
go from the tropical zodiac to the sideral one.
That would make traditional astrologer crazy!!!
However I think it's the only way astrology
can evolve as a field of study. I forgot to mention
Opiuchus, the only zodiac constellation not included
in astrology, should be included as well.
the copernican revolution did on astrology.
Although it's true that geocentric astrology
is as valid as ever, astrology as a field of
study is old fashioned due to it's geocentric
worldview. I found this:
http://www.heliocentric-astrology.com/
I think the only way astrology can evolve is
making the jump to heliocentrism. A major
change would be needed to make it appealing
to a new generation of individuals and astrologers.
The only problem is that all books would have to be
rewritten and astrologers would have to study
the new model. All this seems difficult to happen
in the near term.
And what if besides doing this change, we also
go from the tropical zodiac to the sideral one.
That would make traditional astrologer crazy!!!
However I think it's the only way astrology
can evolve as a field of study. I forgot to mention
Opiuchus, the only zodiac constellation not included
in astrology, should be included as well.