Cosmiccradle
05-04-2010, 06:48 PM
Astrologers use directions and progressions for correction purposes. A divorce might be an Uranus to the 7th, a graduation in higher education with Saturnus to the ninth, imprisonment Neptune to the 12th, you can fill it in yourself. More often then not astrologers seek a full aspect, that is to say if one was in a car accident and had lost a leg at 16 directions/progressions would be sought for that day of the accident. The closer the better.
However I question this insight, the closer the better. Many things in our lives that make a big impression on us vary in impact and that impact also varies per person, and that impact varies with time, and time varies again with each person. To explain this in a perhaps better way, the following.
Bill is deeply in love and can not live without his girlfriend, one day he catches her in bed with another man, his life is devastated, she leaves him even though he's willing to forgive her. Two days later he hangs himself in his room.
Tom is deeply in love and can not live without his girlfriend, one day he catches her in bed with another man, she leaves him. He is astounded by what's happening and can't phathom what's happening. With each passing day he grows more depressed and after a year realizes what he's lost. He attempts suicide and lands in an institution.
The problem is this, in both cases we look for an exact aspect on the date that he caught his girlfriend in bed with another man. That is the trigger in both cases. That is the trigger both men would give to the astrologer.
My point is this, even though in both cases the trigger is the same, it is unrealistic to apply an exact aspect for both men, seeing that we can not measure the psychological impact for both men. For Bill the aspect must be exact, for Tom the same aspect must take place a year later to be exact. Perhaps even longer, if his mental health does not recover. Even if the aspect should be full on that day.
Although we view the catching of the girl in bed as the progressive incident that must be sought in the chart, it is not realistic to apply the same orb/aspect in both cases.
Astrologically, we would apply and exact aspect for both men when correcting the horoscope, because we look at the original occurance. This in my opinion is wrong, the occurance can not be measured when dealing with people and what for impact it has over time.
So what measure of time should you use when you are using directions and progressions for the same situation with two different men?
However I question this insight, the closer the better. Many things in our lives that make a big impression on us vary in impact and that impact also varies per person, and that impact varies with time, and time varies again with each person. To explain this in a perhaps better way, the following.
Bill is deeply in love and can not live without his girlfriend, one day he catches her in bed with another man, his life is devastated, she leaves him even though he's willing to forgive her. Two days later he hangs himself in his room.
Tom is deeply in love and can not live without his girlfriend, one day he catches her in bed with another man, she leaves him. He is astounded by what's happening and can't phathom what's happening. With each passing day he grows more depressed and after a year realizes what he's lost. He attempts suicide and lands in an institution.
The problem is this, in both cases we look for an exact aspect on the date that he caught his girlfriend in bed with another man. That is the trigger in both cases. That is the trigger both men would give to the astrologer.
My point is this, even though in both cases the trigger is the same, it is unrealistic to apply an exact aspect for both men, seeing that we can not measure the psychological impact for both men. For Bill the aspect must be exact, for Tom the same aspect must take place a year later to be exact. Perhaps even longer, if his mental health does not recover. Even if the aspect should be full on that day.
Although we view the catching of the girl in bed as the progressive incident that must be sought in the chart, it is not realistic to apply the same orb/aspect in both cases.
Astrologically, we would apply and exact aspect for both men when correcting the horoscope, because we look at the original occurance. This in my opinion is wrong, the occurance can not be measured when dealing with people and what for impact it has over time.
So what measure of time should you use when you are using directions and progressions for the same situation with two different men?