Titaneurope
06-18-2009, 10:43 AM
Hi members of the forum,
I am having a doubt with the ruler planets in south Hemisphere. We know that in North Hemisphere - i.e. - the rulership of Leo is the Sun. According to what I read, this is because the Sun in Leo is when he reach his maximum power on earth of course in North Hemisphere - So in Sun in Leo is in dignity.
However in South Hemisphere this happens in Aquarius. Exactly the opposite.
What would be the case for the South Hemisphere? Would be wrong to say that the sun is in dignity in Aquarius, so is Aquarius rulership. And in case this is correct, what happens to the rest of the plants. Letīs say; Uranus and Saturn wouldnīt be any more the rulers of Aquarius in case we base on the theory that the sun is in dignity in the sign he reach his maximum power on the place of the Earth we are standing. And with all exalted, detriment and fall planets positions; would they change?
I would be grateful for any point of view on the subject.
Titaneurope
I am having a doubt with the ruler planets in south Hemisphere. We know that in North Hemisphere - i.e. - the rulership of Leo is the Sun. According to what I read, this is because the Sun in Leo is when he reach his maximum power on earth of course in North Hemisphere - So in Sun in Leo is in dignity.
However in South Hemisphere this happens in Aquarius. Exactly the opposite.
What would be the case for the South Hemisphere? Would be wrong to say that the sun is in dignity in Aquarius, so is Aquarius rulership. And in case this is correct, what happens to the rest of the plants. Letīs say; Uranus and Saturn wouldnīt be any more the rulers of Aquarius in case we base on the theory that the sun is in dignity in the sign he reach his maximum power on the place of the Earth we are standing. And with all exalted, detriment and fall planets positions; would they change?
I would be grateful for any point of view on the subject.
Titaneurope