About Considerations Before Judgement.

[Draco]

Hi all,

I am currently looking at a chart, in which I am inquiring about my partner, the only thing I had on my mind when I asked the question.

In the chart, Capricorn rises, and makes me Saturn in the seventh house.

The thing is, that Saturn in the seventh is supposed to be a consideration before judgement. However, in this case, it is actually quite appropriate, or what you might call 'radical', that Saturn is in the seventh, because after all, my thoughts are upon my partner, so is this not a rather appropriate place to find the significator? In such a case, can we be lenient with the considerations before judgement, when it so happens that the configuration which would warn to consideration, is in fact radically placed in accordance to the nature of the question?

In the chart I'm looking at by the way, there are no other considerations before judgement, so I deem the horary to be able to be interpreted, as long as I heed the warning that there may be a restriction upon the amount of information I can receive from the chart.

I understand that some see that Saturn in or ruling the seventh is an indication not to judge at all. I see it that it is just a factor to take into consideration while going about the interpretation, rather than not interpreting at all, unless there are many consideration before judgement.

Draco :wink:

[fensi88]

However, in this case, it is actually quite appropriate, or what you might call 'radical', that Saturn is in the seventh, because after all, my thoughts are upon my partner, so is this not a rather appropriate place to find the significator?
Yes, you are right, I think the same.

[Radu]

Saturn in the 7th house is only a factor that might infringe astrologer's judgement ONLY if the astrologer is represented in the 7th house - as it usually happens.

In this case, the astrologer is the inquirer, which places both in the 1st house.

So, go on and judge the chart.

Also, I'd like to tell you that there were many charts I judged wrong which presented more than one consideration before judgement. I noticed these considerations only afterwards when I reviewed the chart to see why it went wrong. With this in mind, i could see clearly that the right answer was still in the chart. What I really want to say is that there is no "unfit to judge chart" only unprepared astrologers with less knowledge than required by the chart.

If the question was genuine, the answer is in the chart, it is really that simple/